Re: buildkernel broken on if_ixl when EVDEV is enabled

2018-06-22 Thread Navdeep Parhar
On 06/22/18 10:38, Navdeep Parhar wrote: > On 06/22/18 10:25, Pete Wright wrote: >> >> >> On 06/21/2018 20:47, Danilo Egêa Gondolfo wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> check if you have 'options IXL_IW' in your kernel conf. It's removed >>> from GENERIC. I had the same problem here with my customized conf. >> >

Re: buildkernel broken on if_ixl when EVDEV is enabled

2018-06-22 Thread Pete Wright
On 06/22/2018 10:38, Navdeep Parhar wrote: On 06/22/18 10:25, Pete Wright wrote: On 06/21/2018 20:47, Danilo Egêa Gondolfo wrote: Hi, check if you have 'options IXL_IW' in your kernel conf. It's removed from GENERIC. I had the same problem here with my customized conf. ah - that was totall

Re: buildkernel broken on if_ixl when EVDEV is enabled

2018-06-22 Thread Navdeep Parhar
On 06/22/18 10:25, Pete Wright wrote: > > > On 06/21/2018 20:47, Danilo Egêa Gondolfo wrote: >> Hi, >> >> check if you have 'options IXL_IW' in your kernel conf. It's removed >> from GENERIC. I had the same problem here with my customized conf. > > ah - that was totally it i think.  i was lazy a

Re: buildkernel broken on if_ixl when EVDEV is enabled

2018-06-22 Thread Pete Wright
On 06/21/2018 20:47, Danilo Egêa Gondolfo wrote: Hi, check if you have 'options IXL_IW' in your kernel conf. It's removed from GENERIC. I had the same problem here with my customized conf. ah - that was totally it i think.  i was lazy and just copied GENERIC to GENERIC-EVDEV so it got of s

Re: buildkernel broken on if_ixl when EVDEV is enabled

2018-06-21 Thread Danilo Egêa Gondolfo
Hi, check if you have 'options IXL_IW' in your kernel conf. It's removed from GENERIC. I had the same problem here with my customized conf. On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 11:43 PM, Pete Wright wrote: > howdy - just ran into an issue with building a kernel that has EVDEV > enabled causing this error: >

Re: buildkernel broken after r326553

2017-12-05 Thread Yuri Pankov
On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 09:24:28AM -0800, Bryan Drewery wrote: On 12/5/2017 9:10 AM, Bryan Drewery wrote: On 12/5/2017 9:03 AM, Yuri Pankov wrote: Hi, Looks like one of the commits by Bryan (r326549-r326553) has broken the kernel build for me (using -j32, but serial build did fail as well) --

Re: buildkernel broken after r326553

2017-12-05 Thread Bryan Drewery
On 12/5/2017 9:10 AM, Bryan Drewery wrote: > On 12/5/2017 9:03 AM, Yuri Pankov wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Looks like one of the commits by Bryan (r326549-r326553) has broken the >> kernel build for me (using -j32, but serial build did fail as well) -- >> checking out r326547 make it work again. >> >> I ca

Re: buildkernel broken after r326553

2017-12-05 Thread Bryan Drewery
On 12/5/2017 9:03 AM, Yuri Pankov wrote: > Hi, > > Looks like one of the commits by Bryan (r326549-r326553) has broken the > kernel build for me (using -j32, but serial build did fail as well) -- > checking out r326547 make it work again. > > I can't pinpoint the exact error in the build log, as

Re: buildkernel broken for META_MODE

2017-04-18 Thread Bryan Drewery
On 4/18/2017 3:26 PM, Simon J. Gerraty wrote: >>> [Creating objdir /usr/obj/usr/obj/root/git/freebsd/sys/GENERIC...] >> Wrong^ >> >> Note we have 'cd /usr/obj/' and 'MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX=/usr/obj' in >> there, so we get a nested /usr/obj/.CURDIR problem of /usr/obj/usr/obj. > > The following would

Re: buildkernel broken for META_MODE

2017-04-18 Thread Simon J. Gerraty
> > [Creating objdir /usr/obj/usr/obj/root/git/freebsd/sys/GENERIC...] > Wrong^ > > Note we have 'cd /usr/obj/' and 'MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX=/usr/obj' in > there, so we get a nested /usr/obj/.CURDIR problem of /usr/obj/usr/obj. The following would probably help that case: Index: auto.obj.mk ===

Re: buildkernel broken for META_MODE

2017-04-18 Thread Simon J. Gerraty
Bryan Drewery wrote: > > What is the issue above? diff? > > I don't know what the issue is with buildkernel specifically, I never > looked into it. Buildworld had other issues like rescue/rescue not being > AUTO_OBJ safe. That's fixed. I forget the details of buildworld as well. > One of the simp

Re: buildkernel broken for META_MODE

2017-04-18 Thread Bryan Drewery
On 4/18/2017 2:33 PM, Simon J. Gerraty wrote: > Bryan Drewery wrote: >> Aha /usr/obj/usr/obj. >> >> That was in Renato's report as well. >> >> The bug is WITH_AUTO_OBJ. I just confirmed that. A bunch of errors occur >> when doing the first build and the opt_*.h files are not generated in >> the "p

Re: buildkernel broken for META_MODE

2017-04-18 Thread Simon J. Gerraty
Bryan Drewery wrote: > Aha /usr/obj/usr/obj. > > That was in Renato's report as well. > > The bug is WITH_AUTO_OBJ. I just confirmed that. A bunch of errors occur > when doing the first build and the opt_*.h files are not generated in > the "proper" place by config(8). > > WITH_AUTO_OBJ is not

Re: buildkernel broken for META_MODE

2017-04-18 Thread Bryan Drewery
On 4/10/2017 11:14 AM, Bryan Drewery wrote: > On 4/7/2017 12:13 PM, Ngie Cooper (yaneurabeya) wrote: >> Hi, >> I ran into this error when trying to run a meta mode build (for the >> first time). It might be related to the recent assym* ordering changes. >> Thanks! >> -Ngie >> >> $ cat /etc/sr

Re: buildkernel broken for META_MODE

2017-04-10 Thread Bryan Drewery
On 4/7/2017 12:13 PM, Ngie Cooper (yaneurabeya) wrote: > Hi, > I ran into this error when trying to run a meta mode build (for the > first time). It might be related to the recent assym* ordering changes. > Thanks! > -Ngie > > $ cat /etc/src-env.conf > WITH_AUTO_OBJ= yes > WITH_META_MODE=

Re: buildkernel broken in HEAD

2014-11-06 Thread Gary Jennejohn
On Wed, 5 Nov 2014 14:18:13 +0100 Gary Jennejohn wrote: > HEAD updated just minutes ago: > > -- > >>> stage 3.1: making dependencies > -- > @/amd64/amd64/genassym.c:79:16: erro

Re: buildkernel broken in HEAD

2014-11-05 Thread Gary Jennejohn
On Wed, 5 Nov 2014 06:02:39 -0800 David Wolfskill wrote: > On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 02:18:13PM +0100, Gary Jennejohn wrote: > > HEAD updated just minutes ago: > > > > -- > > >>> stage 3.1: making dependencies > >

Re: buildkernel broken in HEAD

2014-11-05 Thread David Wolfskill
On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 02:18:13PM +0100, Gary Jennejohn wrote: > HEAD updated just minutes ago: > > -- > >>> stage 3.1: making dependencies > -- > @/amd64/amd64/genassym.c:79:16

Re: buildkernel broken

2010-03-13 Thread Robert Noland
On Sat, 2010-03-13 at 19:35 +0200, Sergey V. Dyatko wrote: > Hi, > I'm trying to build kernel (update from 204272 to 205122) and > got following error: > > ===> drm/i915 (all) > cc -O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -Werror -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE > -nostdinc -DHAVE_KERNEL_OPTION_HEADERS > -include

RE: Buildkernel broken

2003-05-27 Thread David Wolfskill
>Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 12:17:18 -0400 >From: "Will Saxon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> I cvsupped the source this morning and I get: >> [...] >> ===> firewire/firewire >> ... >> In file included from /usr/src/sys/dev/firewire/fwohci.c:72: >> @/dev/firewire/fwdma.h:38: redefinition of `bus_dmasync_op_t

RE: Buildkernel broken

2003-05-27 Thread Will Saxon
> -Original Message- > From: Krzysztof Parzyszek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 11:50 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Buildkernel broken > > > Hello, > > I cvsupped the source this morning and I get: > > [...] > ===> firewire/firewire > cc -O -pipe -marc

Re: buildkernel broken at bluetooth?

2002-11-21 Thread Julian Elischer
On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, walt wrote: > mkdep -f .depend -a -nostdinc -I../../../../netgraph/bluetooth/include -D_KERNEL > -DKLD_MODULE -I- -I../../../../netgraph/bluetooth/include -I. -I@ -I@/dev >-I@/../include > -I/usr/obj/usr/local/mnt/src/i386/usr/include > >/usr/local/mnt/src/sys/modules

Re: buildkernel broken at bluetooth?

2002-11-20 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> walt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : My /usr/src is a symlink to another partition which is mounted : on /usr/local/mnt/src. I can make it compile by modifying the : Makefiles in sys/modules/netgraph/bluetooth like this: : : CFLAGS+= -I${.CURDIR}/../../

Re: buildkernel broken at sys/cam/scsi/scsi_low.c rev. 1.14

2002-05-17 Thread Peter Wemm
Hiroyuki Une wrote: > From: Robert Drehmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 12:52:20 +0200 > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Is "%b" correct as conversion character? > > > > It is an extension to printf(9) which GCC 3.1 does not know about. > > Thank you for your information

Re: buildkernel broken at sys/cam/scsi/scsi_low.c rev. 1.14

2002-05-17 Thread Hiroyuki Une
From: Robert Drehmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 12:52:20 +0200 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Is "%b" correct as conversion character? > > It is an extension to printf(9) which GCC 3.1 does not know about. Thank you for your information. I will wait until "%b" is implemente

Re: buildkernel broken at sys/cam/scsi/scsi_low.c rev. 1.14

2002-05-17 Thread Robert Drehmel
On Fri, May 17, 2002 at 07:45:36PM +0900, Hiroyuki Une wrote: > I found this code at line 4661 of sys/cam/scsi/scsi_low.c rev. 1.14: > > printf("%s(%d:%d): period(%d ns) offset(%d) width(%d) flags 0x%b\n", > slp->sl_xname, ti->ti_id, li->li_lun, > ti->ti_ma

Re: buildkernel broken?

2000-09-21 Thread Warner Losh
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Donn Miller writes: : I've been doing "make buildkernel installkernel" in /usr/src without doing : a "make buildworld" first. Is this OK? NO. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: buildkernel broken?

2000-09-21 Thread Neil Blakey-Milner
On Thu 2000-09-21 (10:00), Donn Miller wrote: > On Thu, 21 Sep 2000, Neil Blakey-Milner wrote: > > > On Thu 2000-09-21 (08:48), Donn Miller wrote: > > > An example of what I get when I try to do a make buildkernel. I have set > > > KERNEL=CUSTOM in /etc/make.conf, so I should be alright there. >

Re: buildkernel broken?

2000-09-21 Thread Neil Blakey-Milner
On Thu 2000-09-21 (08:48), Donn Miller wrote: > An example of what I get when I try to do a make buildkernel. I have set > KERNEL=CUSTOM in /etc/make.conf, so I should be alright there. > > {standard input}:2342: Error: Subtraction of two symbols in different sections >".data" {.data section}

Re: buildkernel broken?

2000-09-21 Thread Neil Blakey-Milner
On Thu 2000-09-21 (16:27), Stijn Hoop wrote: > nm: could not exec elf/nm in /usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/libexec: No such file or >directory Yep, this is the problem. > Which is quite correct since I blew away /usr/obj after my last buildworld > (FreeBSD 4.1-STABLE #0: Wed Sep 13 14:45:31 CEST 200

Re: buildkernel broken?

2000-09-21 Thread Stijn Hoop
On Thu, Sep 21, 2000 at 10:00:59AM -0400, Donn Miller wrote: > On Thu, 21 Sep 2000, Neil Blakey-Milner wrote: > > > On Thu 2000-09-21 (08:48), Donn Miller wrote: > > > An example of what I get when I try to do a make buildkernel. I have set > > > KERNEL=CUSTOM in /etc/make.conf, so I should be a

Re: buildkernel broken?

2000-09-21 Thread Donn Miller
On Thu, 21 Sep 2000, Neil Blakey-Milner wrote: > On Thu 2000-09-21 (08:48), Donn Miller wrote: > > An example of what I get when I try to do a make buildkernel. I have set > > KERNEL=CUSTOM in /etc/make.conf, so I should be alright there. > > > > > {standard input}:2342: Error: Subtraction of

Re: buildkernel broken?

2000-09-21 Thread Adrian Chadd
On Thu, Sep 21, 2000, Donn Miller wrote: > An example of what I get when I try to do a make buildkernel. I have set > KERNEL=CUSTOM in /etc/make.conf, so I should be alright there. > > - Donn > {standard input}:2342: Error: Subtraction of two symbols in different sections >".data" {.data secti