Re: a question about /boot/loader.conf

void writes: > Dag-Erling Smørgrav writes: > > This is a tunable, not a sysctl (although a sysctl of the same name > > will appear if dtrace is compiled into the kernel or loaded) > Odd that bsdinstall adds it to loader.conf then. Why? loader.conf is the correct place for tunables. DES -- Dag

Re: a question about /boot/loader.conf

On Mon, Jul 21, 2025 at 05:38:07PM +0100, void wrote: Odd that bsdinstall adds it to loader.conf then. It was added towards the end of an installation where one would choose hardening. It's from a -current machine but am not sure/can't remember if it's always been -current. I may be completel

Re: a question about /boot/loader.conf

On Mon, Jul 21, 2025 at 06:19:05PM +0200, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: Presumably, these are lines from your /boot/loader.conf. security.bsd.allow_destructive_dtrace=0 This is a tunable, not a sysctl (although a sysctl of the same name will appear if dtrace is compiled into the kernel or loade

Re: a question about /boot/loader.conf

On Mon, Jul 21, 2025 at 09:43:59AM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: Doesn't matter, though quotes are needed for multi-word values. They are otherwise optional. There was a brief period of time where the lua loader didn't completely honor this, and lots of people popped up with complaints :) It all go

Re: a question about /boot/loader.conf

void writes: > On recent -current, I notice that sysctls with a numerical value > are not quoted, but those with an alpabetical one are. > > like this: Presumably, these are lines from your /boot/loader.conf. > security.bsd.allow_destructive_dtrace=0 This is a tunable, not a sysctl (although a

Re: a question about /boot/loader.conf

On Mon, Jul 21, 2025 at 8:32 AM void wrote: > > Hi, > > On recent -current, I notice that sysctls with a numerical value > are not quoted, but those with an alpabetical one are. > > like this: > > security.bsd.allow_destructive_dtrace=0 > filemon_load="YES" > > Which is the Correct Way? All quoted

Re: Just a question about sys/kern/subr_witness.c where witness_watch may be flipped to -1

On May 20, 2025, at 08:34, Dennis Clarke wrote: > On 5/20/25 01:51, Mark Millard wrote: >> Dennis Clarke wrote on >> Date: Tue, 20 May 2025 02:33:58 UTC: >>> Just an odd message to see on the console : >>> >>> # witness_lock_list_get: witness exhausted >>> >>> Looking at https://cgit.free

Re: Just a question about sys/kern/subr_witness.c where witness_watch may be flipped to -1

On 5/20/25 01:51, Mark Millard wrote: Dennis Clarke wrote on Date: Tue, 20 May 2025 02:33:58 UTC: Just an odd message to see on the console : # witness_lock_list_get: witness exhausted Looking at https://cgit.freebsd.org/src/tree/sys/kern/subr_witness.c it seems that the comment at lin

RE: Just a question about sys/kern/subr_witness.c where witness_watch may be flipped to -1

Dennis Clarke wrote on Date: Tue, 20 May 2025 02:33:58 UTC: > Just an odd message to see on the console : > > # witness_lock_list_get: witness exhausted > > Looking at https://cgit.freebsd.org/src/tree/sys/kern/subr_witness.c it > seems that the comment at line 370 is very clear : > > /*

libdtrace symbol map [Was: RTLD_DEEPBIND question]

On 16/05/2025 17:11, Mark Johnston wrote: On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 03:22:52PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: On 27/04/2025 17:26, Mark Johnston wrote: On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 08:56:44AM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: On 23/04/2025 21:56, Andriy Gapon wrote: BTW, I've been wondering how illumos avoids

Re: RTLD_DEEPBIND question

On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 10:11:12AM -0400, Mark Johnston wrote: > On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 03:22:52PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: > > On 27/04/2025 17:26, Mark Johnston wrote: > > > On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 08:56:44AM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: > > > > On 23/04/2025 21:56, Andriy Gapon wrote: > > > > >

Re: RTLD_DEEPBIND question

On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 03:22:52PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: > On 27/04/2025 17:26, Mark Johnston wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 08:56:44AM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: > > > On 23/04/2025 21:56, Andriy Gapon wrote: > > > > BTW, I've been wondering how illumos avoids the problem even though they

Re: RTLD_DEEPBIND question

On 27/04/2025 17:26, Mark Johnston wrote: On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 08:56:44AM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: On 23/04/2025 21:56, Andriy Gapon wrote: BTW, I've been wondering how illumos avoids the problem even though they do not use any special dlopen flags. It turns out that they link almost all s

Re: RTLD_DEEPBIND question

On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 08:56:44AM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: > On 23/04/2025 21:56, Andriy Gapon wrote: > > BTW, I've been wondering how illumos avoids the problem even though they > > do not use any special dlopen flags. > > It turns out that they link almost all system shared libraries with > >

Re: RTLD_DEEPBIND question

On 23/04/2025 21:56, Andriy Gapon wrote: BTW, I've been wondering how illumos avoids the problem even though they do not use any special dlopen flags. It turns out that they link almost all system shared libraries with -Bdirect option (which is Solaris/illumos specific). It's somewhat similar t

Re: RTLD_DEEPBIND question

, should we try to resolve the symbol in > > > > refobj itself when it's marked with deepbind? > > > Oh, and it looks like objects loaded under the "deepbind" object (e.g., > > > needed objects) may not be aware that they are in the deepbind sub-tree? >

Re: RTLD_DEEPBIND question

On 19/04/2025 13:38, Konstantin Belousov wrote: And there is the version with the recursive marking by deepbind: I think that this patch would help with my case (haven't tested yet). But I am not sure if it would be "correct". First, as you have rightfully asked, it's not clear that deepbind s

Re: RTLD_DEEPBIND question

like objects loaded under the "deepbind" object (e.g., needed objects) may not be aware that they are in the deepbind sub-tree? But should they? That's a right question. I have been reading about RTLD_DEEPBIND and Solaris flags like RTLD_GROUP, etc at the same time. I guess th

Re: RTLD_DEEPBIND question

On Sat, Apr 19, 2025 at 01:29:15PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Sat, Apr 19, 2025 at 01:25:28PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: > > On 19/04/2025 12:39, Andriy Gapon wrote: > > > On 19/04/2025 12:25, Andriy Gapon wrote: > > > > On 19/04/2025 02:41, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > > > > RTLD_DEE

Re: RTLD_DEEPBIND question

On Sat, Apr 19, 2025 at 01:25:28PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: > On 19/04/2025 12:39, Andriy Gapon wrote: > > On 19/04/2025 12:25, Andriy Gapon wrote: > > > On 19/04/2025 02:41, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > > > RTLD_DEEPBIND works by first iterating over all (recursive) DT_NEEEDED > > > > object f

Re: RTLD_DEEPBIND question

On 19/04/2025 12:39, Andriy Gapon wrote: On 19/04/2025 12:25, Andriy Gapon wrote: On 19/04/2025 02:41, Konstantin Belousov wrote: RTLD_DEEPBIND works by first iterating over all (recursive) DT_NEEEDED object for the object where the symbol is resolved, then by looking at the global list of load

Re: RTLD_DEEPBIND question

On 19/04/2025 12:25, Andriy Gapon wrote: On 19/04/2025 02:41, Konstantin Belousov wrote: Could it be that the module is linked to the main binary? It does not appear to be so. The binary: $ ldd /usr/local/bin/mdb /usr/local/bin/mdb:     libncursesw.so.9 => /lib/libncursesw.so.9 (0xbf191c9

Re: RTLD_DEEPBIND question

On 19/04/2025 02:41, Konstantin Belousov wrote: Could it be that the module is linked to the main binary? It does not appear to be so. The binary: $ ldd /usr/local/bin/mdb /usr/local/bin/mdb: libncursesw.so.9 => /lib/libncursesw.so.9 (0xbf191c93000) libtinfow.so.9 => /lib/libtin

Re: RTLD_DEEPBIND question

On Sat, Apr 19, 2025 at 01:03:15AM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: > > I am trying to understand if RTLD_DEEPBIND should help in the following > scenario or if I misunderstand its purpose. > > There is a program that has a parser based on lex/yacc, so there is function > yyparse in the code and global

Re: openzfs and block cloning question

24.11.23 10:17, Alexander Leidinger: Am 2023-11-24 08:10, schrieb Oleksandr Kryvulia: Hi, Recently cperciva@ published in his twitter [1] that enabling block cloning feature tends to data lost on 14.  Is this statement true for the current? Since I am using current for daily work and block cl

Re: openzfs and block cloning question

Am 2023-11-24 08:10, schrieb Oleksandr Kryvulia: Hi, Recently cperciva@ published in his twitter [1] that enabling block cloning feature tends to data lost on 14.  Is this statement true for the current? Since I am using current for daily work and block cloning enabled by default how can I ver

openzfs and block cloning question

Hi, Recently cperciva@ published in his twitter [1] that enabling block cloning feature tends to data lost on 14.  Is this statement true for the current? Since I am using current for daily work and block cloning enabled by default how can I verify that my data is not affected? Thank you.

Re: Question about KBI change / new feature

> On Aug 23, 2023, at 1:06 AM, Warner Losh wrote: > > > > On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 9:42 AM Zhenlei Huang > wrote: > Hi, > > The https://www.freebsd.org/releases/14.0R/schedule/ > says CURRENT/14 's KBI is > froze >

Re: Question about KBI change / new feature

On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 9:42 AM Zhenlei Huang wrote: > Hi, > > The https://www.freebsd.org/releases/14.0R/schedule/ says CURRENT/14 's > KBI is froze > and new features should be avoided. > > I'm working on https://reviews.freebsd.org/D39638 (sysctl(9): Enable vnet > sysctl variables be loader tu

Question about KBI change / new feature

Hi, The https://www.freebsd.org/releases/14.0R/schedule/ says CURRENT/14 's KBI is froze and new features should be avoided. I'm working on https://reviews.freebsd.org/D39638 (sysctl(9): Enable vnet sysctl variables be loader tunable) and I think it is new feature, but not quite sure whether th

Re: git question: How do I push a cherry-pick of someone else's commit?

Mark Johnston wrote: > On Thu, Jun 09, 2022 at 07:49:53PM +, Rick Macklem wrote: > > Mark Johnston wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 09, 2022 at 07:30:47PM +, Rick Macklem wrote: > > > > I just tried to MFC a commit done to fix my commit by imp@ > > > > and it won't let be push the cherry-pi

Re: git question: How do I push a cherry-pick of someone else's commit?

On Thu, Jun 09, 2022 at 07:49:53PM +, Rick Macklem wrote: > Mark Johnston wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jun 09, 2022 at 07:30:47PM +, Rick Macklem wrote: > > > I just tried to MFC a commit done to fix my commit by imp@ > > > and it won't let be push the cherry-pick. > > > > > > What's the trick t

Re: git question: How do I push a cherry-pick of someone else's commit?

Mark Johnston wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 09, 2022 at 07:30:47PM +, Rick Macklem wrote: > > I just tried to MFC a commit done to fix my commit by imp@ > > and it won't let be push the cherry-pick. > > > > What's the trick to doing this? > > You need to add --push-option=confirm-author to the git pu

Re: git question: How do I push a cherry-pick of someone else's commit?

On Thu, Jun 09, 2022 at 07:30:47PM +, Rick Macklem wrote: > I just tried to MFC a commit done to fix my commit by imp@ > and it won't let be push the cherry-pick. > > What's the trick to doing this? You need to add --push-option=confirm-author to the git push invocation. > Or do I need to ge

Re: git question: How do I push a cherry-pick of someone else's commit?

What is the error message? Did you try “git push -f” > On 9. Jun 2022, at 21:33, Rick Macklem wrote: > > I just tried to MFC a commit done to fix my commit by imp@ > and it won't let be push the cherry-pick. > > What's the trick to doing this? > Or do I need to get Warner to do it? > If so, i

git question: How do I push a cherry-pick of someone else's commit?

I just tried to MFC a commit done to fix my commit by imp@ and it won't let be push the cherry-pick. What's the trick to doing this? Or do I need to get Warner to do it? If so, it's 393b7606f9c1 in main, that needs to go into stable/13. rick ps: The stable/13 build will be broken until this gets

Re: question on socket server

hat is not connected to a peer socket." See also "man 2 send" and "man 2 socket" for a lot more information. So it depends a bit on the type of socket you created. Regards and happy hacking, Ronald. *Van:* Piper H *Datum:* woensdag, 15 december 2021 07:52 *Aan:* free

Re: question on socket server

t; > > > *Van:* Piper H > *Datum:* woensdag, 15 december 2021 11:55 > *Aan:* Ronald Klop > *CC:* freebsd-current@freebsd.org > *Onderwerp:* Re: question on socket server > > But I write this program to listen on port who sends a random str to > the socket every

Re: question on socket server

generic perl forum/ML. Van: Piper H Datum: woensdag, 15 december 2021 11:55 Aan: Ronald Klop CC: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Onderwerp: Re: question on socket server But I write this program to listen on port who sends a random str to the socket every 0.25 second. And there is no clie

Re: question on socket server

> Ronald. > > > > *Van:* Piper H > *Datum:* woensdag, 15 december 2021 07:52 > *Aan:* freebsd-current@freebsd.org > *Onderwerp:* question on socket server > > Hello > > I have little knowledge about socket programming. > I have a question that, if I have made

Re: question on socket server

uot; and "man 2 socket" for a lot more information. So it depends a bit on the type of socket you created. Regards and happy hacking, Ronald. Van: Piper H Datum: woensdag, 15 december 2021 07:52 Aan: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Onderwerp: question on socket server Hello I have litt

question on socket server

Hello I have little knowledge about socket programming. I have a question that, if I have made a socket server, listening on a port. The server prints data to the socket, but there is never a client connection to the port, and the data is never consumed. What will happen to the server then? will

Re: buildworld question.

On Thu, Nov 11, 2021, 2:24 PM Jeffrey Bouquet wrote: > > > On Thu, 11 Nov 2021 08:53:47 -0700, Warner Losh wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 5:48 AM Jeffrey Bouquet < > jbt...@iherebuywisely.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Apologies if this applies to STABLE 13, but git is involved... > > > buildwo

Re: buildworld question.

On Thu, 11 Nov 2021 08:53:47 -0700, Warner Losh wrote: > On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 5:48 AM Jeffrey Bouquet > wrote: > > > Apologies if this applies to STABLE 13, but git is involved... > > buildworld is failing 4 minutes or so in. > > would it be useful to re-git the /usr/src? > > Is there a w

Re: buildworld question.

On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 5:48 AM Jeffrey Bouquet wrote: > Apologies if this applies to STABLE 13, but git is involved... > buildworld is failing 4 minutes or so in. > would it be useful to re-git the /usr/src? > Is there a way to run "make buildworld" for a LESS terse error result? > Any other 3rd

buildworld question.

Apologies if this applies to STABLE 13, but git is involved... buildworld is failing 4 minutes or so in. would it be useful to re-git the /usr/src? Is there a way to run "make buildworld" for a LESS terse error result? Any other 3rd method to debug the error? ..

Re: git MFC/cherry-pick question

On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 8:29 PM Alan Somers wrote: > On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 8:13 PM Rick Macklem wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I am trying to MFC a commit to stable/12. > > The cherry-pick works, but the resultant code > > is not correct and won't build. > > --> I broke the build yesterday and manuall

Re: git MFC/cherry-pick question

On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 8:13 PM Rick Macklem wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to MFC a commit to stable/12. > The cherry-pick works, but the resultant code > is not correct and won't build. > --> I broke the build yesterday and manually >reverted the breakage. > > So, how do I do this? > > Do

git MFC/cherry-pick question

Hi, I am trying to MFC a commit to stable/12. The cherry-pick works, but the resultant code is not correct and won't build. --> I broke the build yesterday and manually reverted the breakage. So, how do I do this? Do I have to manually edit the file after the cherry-pick and then do somet

Re: ZFS going forward, on stable/13 vs. main: question

Question . . . Are there any potential future upgrade issues with main [so: 14] vs. stable/13 and releng/13.0 , say by main updates involving ZFS updates in a way stable/13 or the recent releng/13.* might not handle? There's no issue if you don't upgrade the pool on main with ne

Re: ZFS going forward, on stable/13 vs. main: question

[Just a resend: asking the question on the list less than an hour before the UTC month change might not be all that effective relative to those that just web browse the list to read it.] On 2021-Apr-30, at 16:21, Mark Millard wrote: > Context . . . > > I've been experimentin

ZFS going forward, on stable/13 vs. main: question

1160 - free - (580K) The USB SSD is used to boot and use any of (all aarch64): An OverDrive 1000 A MACCHIATObin Double Shot Various RPi4B's with 8 GiBytes RAM Potentially various RPI4B's with 4 GiBytes RAM. Question . . . Are there any potential future upgrade issues with main [

Re: RISC-V root device question -> Panic

On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 6:03 PM Michael Dexter wrote: > > Mitchell, > > On 12/7/20 1:56 PM, Mitchell Horne wrote: > > You can also override it using the QEMU commandline, which is simpler > > since you won't need to recompile anything. Adding the following > > argument should suffice: > > This wor

Re: RISC-V root device question -> Panic

Mitchell, On 12/7/20 1:56 PM, Mitchell Horne wrote: You can also override it using the QEMU commandline, which is simpler since you won't need to recompile anything. Adding the following argument should suffice: This works great but riscv 12-STABLE using last week's snapshot revision throws t

Re: RISC-V root device question

On 12/7/20 2:40 PM, Mitchell Horne wrote: My bad, the extra '=' is a typo. It should be: -append "vfs.root.mountfrom=ufs:/dev/vtbd0p3" That worked perfectly and I added it to the wiki page: https://wiki.freebsd.org/riscv All the best, Michael __

Re: RISC-V root device question

On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 6:28 PM Michael Dexter wrote: > > On 12/7/20 1:56 PM, Mitchell Horne wrote: > > As you suggest, it is possible to overwrite the default root device in > > the kernel config, by adding a line such as: > >options ROOTDEVNAME=\"ufs:/dev/vtbd0p3\" > > Thank you for the synta

Re: RISC-V root device question

On 12/7/20 1:56 PM, Mitchell Horne wrote: As you suggest, it is possible to overwrite the default root device in the kernel config, by adding a line such as: options ROOTDEVNAME=\"ufs:/dev/vtbd0p3\" Thank you for the syntax! You can also override it using the QEMU commandline, which is sim

Re: RISC-V root device question

On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 4:54 PM Michael Dexter wrote: > > All, > > The FreeBSD wiki page on RISC-V reads: > > If you get mountroot prompt, then indicate to the kernel the location of > rootfs: > > mountroot> ufs:/dev/vtbd0 > > This indeed appears to be remain the case on CURRENT as of last week. >

RISC-V root device question

All, The FreeBSD wiki page on RISC-V reads: If you get mountroot prompt, then indicate to the kernel the location of rootfs: mountroot> ufs:/dev/vtbd0 This indeed appears to be remain the case on CURRENT as of last week. Specifying a device and partition, or disklabel at the mountroot> prom

Re: copyright notice question

nts ) . > >The copyright of these modifications with the present license listed > below are >belong to > > > >Rick Macklem , starting from date . > > ( Rick Macklem ... an approximately fixed address ... ) > Does anyone know if there are examples of this in other

Re: copyright notice question

Rick Macklem wrote this message on Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 01:03 +: > Warner Losh wrote: > >On Mon, Oct 19, 2020, 7:25 PM Rick Macklem > >mailto:rmack...@uoguelph.ca>> wrote: > >>I'll admit I've hesitated to ask this for a long time, but I guess I have > >>to;-) > >>I've created two daemons for

Re: copyright notice question

de >substantial ( or significant ) modifications ( or improvements ) . >The copyright of these modifications with the present license listed below are >>belong to > >Rick Macklem , starting from date . > ( Rick Macklem ... an approximately fixed address ... ) Does anyone kn

Re: copyright notice question

On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 4:04 AM Rick Macklem wrote: > Warner Losh wrote: > >On Mon, Oct 19, 2020, 7:25 PM Rick Macklem rmack...@uoguelph.ca>> wrote: > >>I'll admit I've hesitated to ask this for a long time, but I guess I > have to;-) > >>I've created two daemons for NFS-over-TLS, using the code

Re: copyright notice question

Warner Losh wrote: >On Mon, Oct 19, 2020, 7:25 PM Rick Macklem >mailto:rmack...@uoguelph.ca>> wrote: >>I'll admit I've hesitated to ask this for a long time, but I guess I have >>to;-) >>I've created two daemons for NFS-over-TLS, using the code in >>/usr/src/usr.sbin/gssd/gssd.c as a starting poi

Re: copyright notice question

On Mon, Oct 19, 2020, 7:25 PM Rick Macklem wrote: > I'll admit I've hesitated to ask this for a long time, but I guess I have > to;-) > I've created two daemons for NFS-over-TLS, using the code in > /usr/src/usr.sbin/gssd/gssd.c as a starting point. > --> As such, I left the copyright notice from

copyright notice question

I'll admit I've hesitated to ask this for a long time, but I guess I have to;-) I've created two daemons for NFS-over-TLS, using the code in /usr/src/usr.sbin/gssd/gssd.c as a starting point. --> As such, I left the copyright notice from this file on the two files. (As you can see, it is a 2

Re: Xorg question

On 5/9/20 2:35 AM, Filippo Moretti wrote: I run the latest current and I have the following packages installed>xf86-input-keyboard-1.9.0_4 xf86-input-libinput-0.28.2_1 xf86-input-mouse-1.9.3_3 Should I keep all of them or may I keep xf86-input-libinput I don't think there is any harm in havin

Xorg question

I run the latest current and I have the following packages installed>xf86-input-keyboard-1.9.0_4 xf86-input-libinput-0.28.2_1  xf86-input-mouse-1.9.3_3 Should I keep all of them or may I keep xf86-input-libinputThank youFilippo ___ freebsd-current@fre

Re: Question about 'gptzfsboot'

On 2019-04-29 15:24, Ian Lepore wrote: > > I can't say anything at all about drm or other video driver issues, I'm > just not knowledgeable about that stuff at all. > > The only thing I was getting at was that the changes I made in r346675 > might make this error stop happening: > >gptzfsboo

Re: Question about 'gptzfsboot'

you had old BE around, you were able to load old kernel. > > Now the question is, is that gptzfsboot issue really fixed or is it just the > “warm boot” fix you were seeing earlier too. > Toomas: After activating the snapshot made for r346885, I got the same sort of gptzfsboot errors

Re: Question about 'gptzfsboot'

On Mon, 2019-04-29 at 14:47 -0400, Thomas Laus wrote: > On 2019-04-29 14:27, Thomas Laus wrote: > > It was more than a broken console. All of the other 2 computers > > that I > > upgraded to r346885 were essentially 'dead'. I could not even > > remotely > > login to them via ssh. All of them req

Re: Question about 'gptzfsboot'

I am not using the updated > drm-current-kmod because I am using the r346544 kernel.old. > It means you have different issues - one is about gptzfsboot causing boot problems and apparently it got fixed when you did update the bootcode (the boot partition is global). But also you got bitte

Re: Question about 'gptzfsboot'

On 2019-04-29 14:27, Thomas Laus wrote: > It was more than a broken console. All of the other 2 computers that I > upgraded to r346885 were essentially 'dead'. I could not even remotely > login to them via ssh. All of them required a hard power button reset > to get into single user mode to let

Re: Question about 'gptzfsboot'

On 2019-04-29 11:14, Ian Lepore wrote: > > I'm fighting my own video driver troubles (seems like a lot of that > going around lately); on an upgrade of a machine from 11-stable to 12- > stable I lost my console. > > But, a broken kernel and/or userland shouldn't affect your ability to > use the n

Re: Question about 'gptzfsboot'

On 2019-04-29 10:33, Thomas Laus wrote: > Updating to r346885 turned out to be a disaster! There were changes to > DRM between FreeBSD 13.0-CURRENT r346544 and r346885. The desktop that > I use for a build machine because it is much faster than any of my other > PC's installed kernel and world wi

Re: Question about 'gptzfsboot'

On Mon, 2019-04-29 at 10:33 -0400, Thomas Laus wrote: > > On 2019-04-28 22:27, Ian Lepore wrote: > > > > > > If you're using gptzfsboot, I guess you're using zfs? I just > > > fixed a > > > problem with probing disks for zfs volumes a few days ago > > > (r346675). > > > There is even some small

Re: Question about 'gptzfsboot'

> On 2019-04-28 22:27, Ian Lepore wrote: >> >> If you're using gptzfsboot, I guess you're using zfs? I just fixed a >> problem with probing disks for zfs volumes a few days ago (r346675). >> There is even some small chance it fixes this problem, because one of >> the things I noticed was that in

Re: Question about 'gptzfsboot'

On 2019-04-28 22:27, Ian Lepore wrote: > > If you're using gptzfsboot, I guess you're using zfs? I just fixed a > problem with probing disks for zfs volumes a few days ago (r346675). > There is even some small chance it fixes this problem, because one of > the things I noticed was that in one of

Re: Question about 'gptzfsboot'

On Sun, 2019-04-28 at 19:29 -0400, Thomas Laus wrote: > On 2019-04-28 08:07, Ronald Klop wrote: > > > > Is this the same as this? > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=144234 > > > > The messages are similar. The boot process will normally proceed on > the > second or third atte

Re: Question about 'gptzfsboot'

On Sun, Apr 28, 2019 at 5:30 PM Thomas Laus wrote: > On 2019-04-28 08:07, Ronald Klop wrote: > > > > Is this the same as this? > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=144234 > > > The messages are similar. The boot process will normally proceed on the > second or third attempt. On

Re: Question about 'gptzfsboot'

On 2019-04-28 08:07, Ronald Klop wrote: > > Is this the same as this? > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=144234 > The messages are similar. The boot process will normally proceed on the second or third attempt. On some days, I don't see this message appear and my laptops boot no

Re: Question about 'gptzfsboot'

On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 13:31:02 +0200, Thomas Laus wrote: List: I have been having gptzfsboot issues with my two laptops since 12.0 was still CURRENT. I receive 'error 1' on the first boot most days. gptzfsboot: error 1 LBA 18446744072709551608 gptzfsboot: error 1 LBA 1 gptzfsboot: No ZFS pools

Re: Question about 'gptzfsboot'

Toomas Soome [tso...@me.com] wrote: > > > I always update the bootcode with gpart each time when updating my system. > > > > Oh right, this from gptzfsboot… ok, I guess I should do something > I have been planning all along… Do you need some sort of quick workaround? > No quick workaround is

Re: Question about 'gptzfsboot'

> On 26 Apr 2019, at 16:20, Thomas Laus wrote: > > Toomas Soome [tso...@me.com] wrote: >> >> The key is about LBA in first message. Make sure you have latest >> boot code installed with gpart. >> > I always update the bootcode with gpart each time when updating my system. > Oh right, this f

Re: Question about 'gptzfsboot'

Toomas Soome [tso...@me.com] wrote: > > The key is about LBA in first message. Make sure you have latest > boot code installed with gpart. > I always update the bootcode with gpart each time when updating my system. Tom -- Public Keys: PGP KeyID = 0x5F22FDC1 GnuPG KeyID = 0x620836CF __

Re: Question about 'gptzfsboot'

> On 26 Apr 2019, at 14:31, Thomas Laus wrote: > > List: > > I have been having gptzfsboot issues with my two laptops since 12.0 was > still CURRENT. I receive 'error 1' on the first boot most days. > > gptzfsboot: error 1 LBA 18446744072709551608 > gptzfsboot: error 1 LBA 1 > gptzfsboot: N

Question about 'gptzfsboot'

List: I have been having gptzfsboot issues with my two laptops since 12.0 was still CURRENT. I receive 'error 1' on the first boot most days. gptzfsboot: error 1 LBA 18446744072709551608 gptzfsboot: error 1 LBA 1 gptzfsboot: No ZFS pools located, can't boot Most of the time the boot process is

A question about statclock and stathz

s discussed ages ago but given I have been FreeBSDing since V1 - I cannot remember when it was and some argument was made that anything above 128hz was wasteful and suboptimal. The issue with changing it is that if anybody actually uses getrusage and acct for anything it would change behaviour a

Re: kernel config question

On 1/3/19 10:40 PM, Kevin Oberman wrote: > On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 5:02 PM Robert Huff wrote: > >> >> John Baldwin writes: >> >>> -[8] In order to have a kernel that can run the 4.x binaries needed >> to >>> -do an installworld, you must include the COMPAT_FREEBSD4 option in >>> -yo

Re: kernel config question

On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 5:02 PM Robert Huff wrote: > > John Baldwin writes: > > > -[8] In order to have a kernel that can run the 4.x binaries needed > to > > -do an installworld, you must include the COMPAT_FREEBSD4 option in > > -your kernel. Failure to do so may leave you with a

Re: kernel config question

John Baldwin writes: > -[8] In order to have a kernel that can run the 4.x binaries needed to > -do an installworld, you must include the COMPAT_FREEBSD4 option in > -your kernel. Failure to do so may leave you with a system that is > -hard to boot to recover. A similar kern

Re: kernel config question

On 1/2/19 1:31 PM, Robert Huff wrote: > > John Baldwin writes: > >> >> [8] In order to have a kernel that can run the 4.x binaries >> >> needed to do an installworld, you must include the >> >> COMPAT_FREEBSD4 option in your kernel. [...] >> >> > No, COMPAT_FREEBSD4 is not needed. Maybe CO

Re: kernel config question

John Baldwin writes: > >> [8] In order to have a kernel that can run the 4.x binaries > >> needed to do an installworld, you must include the > >> COMPAT_FREEBSD4 option in your kernel. [...] > > > No, COMPAT_FREEBSD4 is not needed. Maybe COMPAT_FREEBSD11 is needed. > > Yes, that te

Re: kernel config question

On 1/2/19 12:02 PM, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! > >> FreeBSD 12.0-CURRENT #0 r331659: Thu Mar 29 12:31:36 EDT 2018 amd64 >> >> to CURRENT (as of last midnight. >> Does this, in src/UPDATING: >> >> [8] In order to have a kernel that can run the 4.x binaries >> needed to do an insta

Re: kernel config question

Hi! > FreeBSD 12.0-CURRENT #0 r331659: Thu Mar 29 12:31:36 EDT 2018 amd64 > > to CURRENT (as of last midnight. > Does this, in src/UPDATING: > > [8] In order to have a kernel that can run the 4.x binaries > needed to do an installworld, you must include the > COMPAT

kernel config question

I'm updating a machine from: FreeBSD 12.0-CURRENT #0 r331659: Thu Mar 29 12:31:36 EDT 2018 amd64 to CURRENT (as of last midnight. Does this, in src/UPDATING: [8] In order to have a kernel that can run the 4.x binaries needed to do an installworld, you mu

Re: ntpd as ntpd user question

On 8/2/18 10:43 PM, Chris H wrote: On Mon, 23 Jul 2018 12:57:28 +0200 "Niclas Zeising" said On 07/21/18 19:56, RW wrote: > On Sat, 21 Jul 2018 11:14:45 -0600 > Ian Lepore wrote: > > >> There's a "pre-world" stage of mergemaster (-Fp option I think) which >> isn't needed often, but one of

Re: ntpd as ntpd user question

On Mon, 23 Jul 2018 12:57:28 +0200 "Niclas Zeising" said On 07/21/18 19:56, RW wrote: > On Sat, 21 Jul 2018 11:14:45 -0600 > Ian Lepore wrote: > > >> There's a "pre-world" stage of mergemaster (-Fp option I think) which >> isn't needed often, but one of the times it is needed is apparently

Re: ntpd as ntpd user question

On Tue, 24 Jul 2018 06:28:41 +0200, Kevin Oberman wrote: On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 7:25 PM, Ian Lepore wrote: On Mon, 2018-07-23 at 18:54 -0700, bob prohaska wrote: > On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 09:34:26PM +0200, Herbert J. Skuhra wrote: > > > > > > Yes, first you press m. Then you will see diff

Re: ntpd as ntpd user question

On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 09:28:41PM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote: > On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 7:25 PM, Ian Lepore wrote: > > > On Mon, 2018-07-23 at 18:54 -0700, bob prohaska wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 09:34:26PM +0200, Herbert J. Skuhra wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, first you press m.

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >