Re: Problem with C11 _Atomic

2018-01-02 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 03:17:14PM +0100, Pierre DAVID wrote: > On Mon, Jan 01, 2018 at 11:09:07PM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > >clang issues a calls to libatomic, which we do not provide. > >As a workaround, use the following command to compile. The resulting > >binary works on all practic

Re: Problem with C11 _Atomic

2018-01-02 Thread Pierre DAVID
On Mon, Jan 01, 2018 at 11:09:07PM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: On Mon, Jan 01, 2018 at 09:47:40PM +0100, Pierre DAVID wrote: Hi, I'm on a recent current: FreeBSD biceps.ma.maison 12.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 12.0-CURRENT #2 r327239: Wed Dec 27 18:25:46 CET 2017 p...@biceps.ma.maison:/us

Re: Problem with C11 _Atomic

2018-01-01 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Mon, Jan 01, 2018 at 09:47:40PM +0100, Pierre DAVID wrote: > Hi, > > I'm on a recent current: > FreeBSD biceps.ma.maison 12.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 12.0-CURRENT #2 r327239: > Wed Dec 27 18:25:46 CET 2017 > p...@biceps.ma.maison:/usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/sys/BICEPS amd64 > > with clang

Problem with C11 _Atomic

2018-01-01 Thread Pierre DAVID
Hi, I'm on a recent current: FreeBSD biceps.ma.maison 12.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 12.0-CURRENT #2 r327239: Wed Dec 27 18:25:46 CET 2017 p...@biceps.ma.maison:/usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/sys/BICEPS amd64 with clang 5.0.1: FreeBSD clang version 5.0.1 (tags/RELEASE_501/final 320880) (based o