Re: Please test PAUSE on non-Intel processors

2002-05-25 Thread Bob Bishop
CPU: Cyrix 486DX2 (486-class CPU) Origin = "CyrixInstead" DIR=0xa01b Stepping=10 Revision=0 # ./pausetest Testing PAUSE instruction: Register esp changed: 0xbfbffd04 -> 0xbfbffcc8 -- Bob Bishop +44 (0)118 977 4017 [EMAIL PROTECTED]fax +44 (0)118 989 4254 To U

Re: Please test PAUSE on non-Intel processors

2002-05-24 Thread Jonathan Mini
I get: stylus:~$ cc pausetest.c stylus:~$ ./a.out Testing PAUSE instruction: Register esp changed: 0xbfbff79c -> 0xbfbff760 .. I assume this is functional. =) I have: CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) MP 1900+ (1592.90-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "AuthenticAMD" Id = 0x662 Stepping = 2 Features=0x383fb

Re: Please test PAUSE on non-Intel processors

2002-05-24 Thread Paul Murphy
On Fri, 24 May 2002 10:25:53 -0400 (EDT) John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hey gang, although Intel's document seems to claim that they tested > proper operation of pause I'd like people with non-Intel processors > to verify that it actually works. Please compile the attached test > prog

Re: Please test PAUSE on non-Intel processors

2002-05-24 Thread Zach Thompson
* John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-05-24 08:27]: > Hey gang, although Intel's document seems to claim that they tested > proper operation of pause I'd like people with non-Intel processors > to verify that it actually works. Please compile the attached test > program and run it. The output

RE: Please test PAUSE on non-Intel processors

2002-05-24 Thread Riccardo Torrini
On 24-May-2002 (14:25:53/GMT) John Baldwin wrote: > Please compile the attached test program and run it... FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #34: Wed May 8 02:31:46 CEST 2002 CPU: Pentium III/Pentium III Xeon/Celeron (501.14-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x672 Stepping = 2 Features=0x

Re: Please test PAUSE on non-Intel processors

2002-05-24 Thread Peter S. Housel
At Fri, 24 May 2002 10:25:53 -0400 (EDT), John Baldwin wrote: > Hey gang, although Intel's document seems to claim that they tested > proper operation of pause I'd like people with non-Intel processors > to verify that it actually works. It works fine on my Transmeta Crusoe TM5600, about as non-i

Re: Please test PAUSE on non-Intel processors

2002-05-24 Thread Peter Wemm
Itanium running x86 binaries: CPU: Itanium (800.03-Mhz) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Model = 0 Revision = 4 Features = 0x0 ia64# ./pausetest Testing PAUSE instruction: Register esp changed: 0xdbc4 -> 0xdb88 ia64# file ./pausetest ./pausetest: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, vers

Re: Please test PAUSE on non-Intel processors

2002-05-24 Thread Per-Arne Holtmon Akø
CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) MP Processor (1194.68-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "AuthenticAMD" Id = 0x661 Stepping = 1 Features=0x383fbff AMD Features=0xc044 (%:~)- ./pausetest Testing PAUSE instruction: Register esp changed: 0xbfbff9c4 -> 0xbfbff988 -- vrak AKA Per-Arne Holtmon Akø E-mail:

Re: Please test PAUSE on non-Intel processors

2002-05-24 Thread Erik Trulsson
On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 10:25:53AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > Hey gang, although Intel's document seems to claim that they tested > proper operation of pause I'd like people with non-Intel processors > to verify that it actually works. Please compile the attached test > program and run it. The

Re: Please test PAUSE on non-Intel processors

2002-05-24 Thread Gavin Atkinson
On Fri, 24 May 2002, John Baldwin wrote: > Hey gang, although Intel's document seems to claim that they tested > proper operation of pause I'd like people with non-Intel processors > to verify that it actually works. Please compile the attached test > program and run it. The only non-intel or A

Re: Please test PAUSE on non-Intel processors

2002-05-24 Thread Bakul Shah
$ dmesg | head | tail -4 CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) XP 1700+ (1466.51-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "AuthenticAMD" Id = 0x662 Stepping = 2 Features=0x383f9ff AMD Features=0xc048<,AMIE,DSP,3DNow!> $ ./pt Testing PAUSE instruction: Register esp changed: 0xbfbff860 -> 0xbfbff824 To Unsubscribe:

Re: Please test PAUSE on non-Intel processors

2002-05-24 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2002-05-24 10:25, John Baldwin wrote: > Please compile the attached test program and run it. The output > should look like this: > > > ./pt > Testing PAUSE instruction: > Register esp changed: 0xbfbff9fc -> 0xbfbff9c0 Intel Pentium 133 here, the output looks fine: hades+charon:/tmp$ cc -o pa

Re: Please test PAUSE on non-Intel processors

2002-05-24 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On 24 Mai, John Baldwin wrote: > Hey gang, although Intel's document seems to claim that they tested > proper operation of pause I'd like people with non-Intel processors > to verify that it actually works. Please compile the attached test > program and run it. The output should look like this:

Re: Please test PAUSE on non-Intel processors

2002-05-24 Thread Bob Bishop
CPU: Cyrix 6x86MX (166.19-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "CyrixInstead" Id = 0x600 Stepping = 0 DIR=0x0452 Features=0x80a135 spambox2% ./pausetest Testing PAUSE instruction: Register esp changed: 0xbfbffbbc -> 0xbfbffb80 CPU: AMD Duron(tm) Processor (995.77-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "

Re: Please test PAUSE on non-Intel processors

2002-05-24 Thread Kenneth Culver
I tested this on my T-bird athlon 800, and this is the result: Testing PAUSE instruction: Register esp changed: 0xbfbffb38 -> 0xbfbffafc So I guess there's no problem. Ken On Fri, 24 May 2002, John Baldwin wrote: > Hey gang, although Intel's document seems to claim that they tested > proper o

Please test PAUSE on non-Intel processors

2002-05-24 Thread John Baldwin
Hey gang, although Intel's document seems to claim that they tested proper operation of pause I'd like people with non-Intel processors to verify that it actually works. Please compile the attached test program and run it. The output should look like this: > ./pt Testing PAUSE instruction: Regi