> Dnia 06.06.2010 b. f. napisał/a:
> > Is anybody planning to update the base system heimdal, which has been
> > largely untouched since May 2008? In addition to the many other
> > bug-fixes and improvements in the current version 1.3.3 (see, for
> > example:
>
> I decided to give it a try. My
(from the freebsd-current mailing list)
Dnia 06.06.2010 b. f. napisał/a:
> Is anybody planning to update the base system heimdal, which has been
> largely untouched since May 2008? In addition to the many other
> bug-fixes and improvements in the current version 1.3.3 (see, for
> example:
I de
On 06/06/2010 12:41 PM, b. f. wrote:
> Is anybody planning to update the base system heimdal, which has been
> largely untouched since May 2008? In addition to the many other
> bug-fixes and improvements in the current version 1.3.3 (see, for
> example:
>
> http://www.h5l.org/releases.html
>
> )
On 06/07/2010 02:29 PM, Jos Backus wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 03:15:27PM +0100, Doug Rabson wrote:
>> On 6 June 2010 21:09, Jos Backus wrote:
>>
>>> Any chance the kadmin protocol will ever be standardized?
>>>
>> My understanding is that the MIT kadmin protocol is based GSS-API
>> authentic
On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 03:15:27PM +0100, Doug Rabson wrote:
> On 6 June 2010 21:09, Jos Backus wrote:
>
> > Any chance the kadmin protocol will ever be standardized?
> >
> >
> My understanding is that the MIT kadmin protocol is based GSS-API
> authenticated RPC which FreeBSD didn't support until
On 6 June 2010 21:09, Jos Backus wrote:
> Any chance the kadmin protocol will ever be standardized?
>
>
My understanding is that the MIT kadmin protocol is based GSS-API
authenticated RPC which FreeBSD didn't support until recently. I added
working RPCSEC_GSS to our userland RPC library in 2008 a
Any chance the kadmin protocol will ever be standardized?
Jos
On Jun 6, 2010 12:28 PM, "Garrett Wollman" wrote:
< said:
> Is anybody planning to...
I would love for it to go away entirely, and those base-system
components that depend on it to learn how to use either Kerberos
implementation fro
< said:
> Is anybody planning to update the base system heimdal, which has been
> largely untouched since May 2008?
I would love for it to go away entirely, and those base-system
components that depend on it to learn how to use either Kerberos
implementation from ports. (I'd also love for the an
Is anybody planning to update the base system heimdal, which has been
largely untouched since May 2008? In addition to the many other
bug-fixes and improvements in the current version 1.3.3 (see, for
example:
http://www.h5l.org/releases.html
), there are patches for heimdal vulnerabilities 2010-
