On 11/04/12 08:29, Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 2012-11-04 14:18, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Sun, Nov 04, 2012 at 02:42:13PM +0200, David Naylor wrote:
...
I tried building (using gcc) wine with your patch and now (at least)
winecfg
and regedit work with a clang built lib32. I'll email Gerald
On Sun, Nov 04, 2012 at 03:29:42PM +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 2012-11-04 14:18, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 04, 2012 at 02:42:13PM +0200, David Naylor wrote:
> ...
> >> I tried building (using gcc) wine with your patch and now (at least)
> >> winecfg
> >> and regedit work wit
On 2012-11-04 14:18, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Sun, Nov 04, 2012 at 02:42:13PM +0200, David Naylor wrote:
...
I tried building (using gcc) wine with your patch and now (at least) winecfg
and regedit work with a clang built lib32. I'll email Gerald (wine's
maintainer) about including your p
On Sun, Nov 04, 2012 at 02:42:13PM +0200, David Naylor wrote:
> On Saturday, 3 November 2012 23:47:54 Jan Beich wrote:
> > David Naylor writes:
> > > There are two issues here: 1) wine compiled with clang, and 2) wine
> > > (compiled with gcc) running on clang compiled base.
> > >
> > > Regarding
On Saturday, 3 November 2012 23:47:54 Jan Beich wrote:
> David Naylor writes:
> > There are two issues here: 1) wine compiled with clang, and 2) wine
> > (compiled with gcc) running on clang compiled base.
> >
> > Regarding 1), according to the wiki [1], wine does have stack alignment
> > issues
David Naylor writes:
> On Friday, 2 November 2012 10:13:30 David Chisnall wrote:
>
>> On 2 Nov 2012, at 05:24, Jan Beich wrote:
>> >> Known Issues
>> >
>> > emulators/wine doesn't work with lib32 built by clang, probably due to
>> > wine bugs.
>>
>> Is this still the case? There was an issue p
On 2012-Nov-02 11:21:10 -0500, Brooks Davis wrote:
>On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 10:21:19AM +, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
>> It's a shame though that, with LLVM as the
>> default compiler, further development of
>> FreeBSD/ia64 and FreeBSD/sparc64
>> will probably suffer and then stop altogether.
>
On Friday, 2 November 2012 10:13:30 David Chisnall wrote:
> On 2 Nov 2012, at 05:24, Jan Beich wrote:
> >> Known Issues
> >
> > emulators/wine doesn't work with lib32 built by clang, probably due to
> > wine bugs.
>
> Is this still the case? There was an issue preventing WINE from working
> beca
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 10:05 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 9:59 PM, Steve Kargl
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 10:29:45PM -0500, Brooks Davis wrote:
> >> - Not all libm tests pass. More work by subject matter experts is
> >>required to create tests cases for LLVM
On 2 November 2012 12:23, Brooks Davis wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 04:30:50PM +0100, Roman Divacky wrote:
>> Nice :)
>>
>> Does this deserve mentioning in UPDATING and/or version bump?
>
> It certainly does deserve mention in UPDATING. A version bump is
> probably useful if we end up wanting
On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 04:30:50PM +0100, Roman Divacky wrote:
> Nice :)
>
> Does this deserve mentioning in UPDATING and/or version bump?
It certainly does deserve mention in UPDATING. A version bump is
probably useful if we end up wanting to make USE_GCC=any the default
post the switch so I wi
On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 10:21:19AM +, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2012 17:08:18 +1100
> From: "Greg 'groggy' Lehey"
> To: Erich Dollansky
> Subject: FORTRAN vs. Fortran (was: November 5th is Clang-Day)
>
>
On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 09:59:17PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 10:29:45PM -0500, Brooks Davis wrote:
> > - Not all libm tests pass. More work by subject matter experts is
> >required to create tests cases for LLVM developers. Most problems are
> >not expected to b
On 11/2/2012 8:30 AM, Roman Divacky wrote:
Nice :)
Does this deserve mentioning in UPDATING and/or version bump?
I would think so.
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe,
Nice :)
Does this deserve mentioning in UPDATING and/or version bump?
On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 10:29:45PM -0500, Brooks Davis wrote:
> On Monday, November 5th I plan to commit the following patch to make
> clang the default compiler on i386 and amd64. Many people have worked
> long and hard to ma
Den 02/11/2012 kl. 04.29 skrev Brooks Davis :
> On Monday, November 5th I plan to commit the following patch to make
> clang the default compiler on i386 and amd64. Many people have worked
> long and hard to make this a reality and we're finally close enough to
> throw the switch.
Congratulation
On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 07:27:44AM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
>
> caNyO usti llputw hitespa cewhere ever you like in for TraN?
>
Sigh. You can get copies of the final committee drafts of
the Fortran 95, 2003, and 2008 standards. There you will
learn that Fortran since Fortran 90 al
On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 08:25:58AM +, David Chisnall wrote:
> On 2 Nov 2012, at 08:18, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
>
> > Very many years ago , when 2010 was a very distant future , I do not
> > remember the name of the writer , who wrote approximately :
> >
> > "In 2010 , there will be Fortr
On 11/02/2012 05:21 AM, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2012 17:08:18 +1100
From: "Greg 'groggy' Lehey"
To: Erich Dollansky
Subject: FORTRAN vs. Fortran (was: November 5th is Clang-Day)
On Friday, 2 November 2012 at 1
On 11/02/12 04:29, Brooks Davis wrote:
> On Monday, November 5th I plan to commit the following patch to make
> clang the default compiler on i386 and amd64. Many people have worked
> long and hard to make this a reality and we're finally close enough to
> throw the switch. For many users the tra
From thera...@theravensnest.org Fri Nov 2 10:54:08 2012
On 2 Nov 2012, at 10:21, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> further development of
> FreeBSD/ia64 and FreeBSD/sparc64
> will probably suffer and then stop altogether
There is a SPARC64 back end for L
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2012 17:08:18 +1100
From: "Greg 'groggy' Lehey"
To: Erich Dollansky
Subject: FORTRAN vs. Fortran (was: November 5th is Clang-Day)
On Friday, 2 November 2012 at 12:21:03 +0700, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> Hi,
On 2 Nov 2012, at 08:18, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
> Very many years ago , when 2010 was a very distant future , I do not
> remember the name of the writer , who wrote approximately :
>
> "In 2010 , there will be Fortran , but a Fortran which may be different ."
I remember a talk in the mid '
On 2 Nov 2012, at 05:24, Jan Beich wrote:
>> Known Issues
>
> emulators/wine doesn't work with lib32 built by clang, probably due to
> wine bugs.
Is this still the case? There was an issue preventing WINE from working
because it required stricter stack alignment than clang provided by default,
On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 10:31:26PM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 10:24 PM, Jan Beich wrote:
> > emulators/wine doesn't work with lib32 built by clang, probably due to
> > wine bugs.
>
> All of these items should be catalogued in a common place, like the
> wiki.
I've added
On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 12:21:03PM +0700, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 1 Nov 2012 21:59:17 -0700
> Steve Kargl wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 10:29:45PM -0500, Brooks Davis wrote:
> > > - Not all libm tests pass. More work by subject matter experts is
> > >required to cre
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 10:24 PM, Jan Beich wrote:
> Brooks Davis writes:
>
>> Known Issues
>
> emulators/wine doesn't work with lib32 built by clang, probably due to
> wine bugs.
All of these items should be catalogued in a common place, like the
wiki. Most of the problems will become apparent o
Brooks Davis writes:
> Known Issues
emulators/wine doesn't work with lib32 built by clang, probably due to
wine bugs.
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail t
Hi,
On Thu, 1 Nov 2012 21:59:17 -0700
Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 10:29:45PM -0500, Brooks Davis wrote:
> > - Not all libm tests pass. More work by subject matter experts is
> >required to create tests cases for LLVM developers. Most
> > problems are not expected to be ma
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 9:59 PM, Steve Kargl
wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 10:29:45PM -0500, Brooks Davis wrote:
>> - Not all libm tests pass. More work by subject matter experts is
>>required to create tests cases for LLVM developers. Most problems are
>>not expected to be major in p
On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 10:29:45PM -0500, Brooks Davis wrote:
> - Not all libm tests pass. More work by subject matter experts is
>required to create tests cases for LLVM developers. Most problems are
>not expected to be major in practice given that LLVM is being used for
>scientific
On Monday, November 5th I plan to commit the following patch to make
clang the default compiler on i386 and amd64. Many people have worked
long and hard to make this a reality and we're finally close enough to
throw the switch. For many users the transition should be transparent.
Others will like
32 matches
Mail list logo
