Hi,
same 12 under bhyve on a 11.2p4, it's working here on Intel platform,
from dmesg:
[]
FreeBSD 12.0-ALPHA9 r339293 GENERIC-NODEBUG amd64
FreeBSD clang version 6.0.1 (tags/RELEASE_601/final 335540) (based on
LLVM 6.0.1)
VT: init without driver.
CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1220 v5 @ 3.00GHz
In message <201810082255.w98mtn1p033...@pdx.rh.cn85.dnsmgr.net>, "Rodney W. Gri
mes" writes:
>> I tried running 12.0-BETA8 under bhyve on a Phenom-II+11.2 box and
>> it explodes because of an unemulated instruction:
>>
>> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232081
>>
>>
> I tried running 12.0-BETA8 under bhyve on a Phenom-II+11.2 box and
> it explodes because of an unemulated instruction:
>
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232081
>
> I have no idea what importance this has in relation to releasing 12.0
Can you try an earlier alpha for me?
> On Mon, Oct 08, 2018 at 07:12:59PM +, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> > I tried running 12.0-BETA8 under bhyve on a Phenom-II+11.2 box and
> > it explodes because of an unemulated instruction:
> >
> > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232081
> >
> > I have no idea what import
On Mon, Oct 08, 2018 at 07:12:59PM +, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> I tried running 12.0-BETA8 under bhyve on a Phenom-II+11.2 box and
> it explodes because of an unemulated instruction:
>
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232081
>
> I have no idea what importance this has
I tried running 12.0-BETA8 under bhyve on a Phenom-II+11.2 box and
it explodes because of an unemulated instruction:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232081
I have no idea what importance this has in relation to releasing 12.0
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Z
