On Fri, 2011-02-25 at 13:08 +0100, Olivier Smedts wrote:
> Not the same sysmacros.h, the one patched is
> sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/sys/sysmacros.h, the other one
> you referenced (sys/cddl/compat/opensolaris/sys/sysmacros.h) is
> removed by the patch.
So it is - apologies for the n
2011/2/25 Bruce Cran :
> On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 10:59:04AM +0100, Olivier Smedts wrote:
>>
>> Added ? The patch fails because the svn tag is not expanded, but what
>> the patch does is remove the file. You can do so after patching if it
>> failed.
>
> It looks like there are two patches to sysmacr
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 10:59:04AM +0100, Olivier Smedts wrote:
>
> Added ? The patch fails because the svn tag is not expanded, but what
> the patch does is remove the file. You can do so after patching if it
> failed.
It looks like there are two patches to sysmacros.h - the first adds SIGNOF an
2011/2/25 Bruce Cran :
> On Wed, 2011-02-23 at 23:28 +0100, Olivier Smedts wrote:
>
>> I'm successfuly using the following on latest 9-CURRENT :
>> http://people.freebsd.org/~mm/patches/zfs/v28/head-zfsv28-20110219-nopython.patch.xz
>
> sys/cddl/compat/opensolaris/sys/sysmacros.h will fail to patch
On Wed, 2011-02-23 at 23:28 +0100, Olivier Smedts wrote:
> I'm successfuly using the following on latest 9-CURRENT :
> http://people.freebsd.org/~mm/patches/zfs/v28/head-zfsv28-20110219-nopython.patch.xz
sys/cddl/compat/opensolaris/sys/sysmacros.h will fail to patch on the
latest -CURRENT but tha
2011/2/23 Jason Garrett :
> On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 08:01, Anonymous wrote:
>
>> Anonymous writes:
>>
>> > Pawel Jakub Dawidek writes:
>> >
>> >> The new patchset is ready for testing:
>> >>
>> >> http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/patches/zfs_20101212.patch.bz2
>> >>
>> >
>> > `-e' option in zd
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 08:01, Anonymous wrote:
> Anonymous writes:
>
> > Pawel Jakub Dawidek writes:
> >
> >> The new patchset is ready for testing:
> >>
> >> http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/patches/zfs_20101212.patch.bz2
> >>
> >
> > `-e' option in zdb(8) now looks under /dev/dsk by defaul
Anonymous writes:
> Pawel Jakub Dawidek writes:
>
>> The new patchset is ready for testing:
>>
>> http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/patches/zfs_20101212.patch.bz2
>>
>
> `-e' option in zdb(8) now looks under /dev/dsk by default
>
> $ zdb -ec blah
>
> Configuration for import:
> v
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 10:15:40AM +0200, Andrei Kolu wrote:
> 2010/12/14 Pawel Jakub Dawidek
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 10:45:56PM +0100, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> > > Hi.
> > >
> > > The new patchset is ready for testing:
> > >
> > > http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/patches/zfs_20101
Pawel Jakub Dawidek writes:
> The new patchset is ready for testing:
>
> http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/patches/zfs_20101212.patch.bz2
>
`-e' option in zdb(8) now looks under /dev/dsk by default
$ zdb -ec blah
Configuration for import:
vdev_children: 1
version: 6
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 12:54:36AM +0300, Rechistov Grigory (Речистов Григорий)
wrote:
> I started to check the new ZFS version inside a VirtualBox machine. So far
> it works for me without crashes, but I got some observations worth
> mentioning. Here are the steps I made:
>
> 1. Installed 8.
On 12/15/2010 23:19, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 10:15:00PM -0500, ben wilber wrote:
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 10:45:56PM +0100, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
Hi.
The new patchset is ready for testing:
Running fine for 24 hours now under load with a ~50 disk v15 (not
upgrad
2010/12/13 Pawel Jakub Dawidek :
> Please test, test, test. Chances are this is the last patchset before
> v28 going to HEAD (finally). Especially test new changes, like boot
> support and sendfile(2) support. Also be sure to verify if you can
> import for existing ZFS pools (v13-v15) when running
On 17/12/2010 08:56, Rechistov Grigory (Речистов Григорий) wrote:
By the way, could someone suggest what types of stability tests I might
perform? I.e. examples of disk- and FS-intensive workloads.
Run blogbench and bonnie++ at the same time, possibly with tarring and
untarring /usr/ports.
_
I got more stacktraces in course of compilation of bash, see the updated
dmesg.
By the way, could someone suggest what types of stability tests I might
perform? I.e. examples of disk- and FS-intensive workloads.
On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 00:54:36 +0300, Rechistov Grigory (Речистов Григорий)
wr
On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 01:29:14 +0300, Olivier Smedts
wrote:
2010/12/16 Rechistov Grigory (Речистов Григорий) :
I started to check the new ZFS version inside a VirtualBox machine. So
far
it works for me without crashes, but I got some observations worth
mentioning. Here are the steps I made:
2010/12/16 Rechistov Grigory (Речистов Григорий) :
> I started to check the new ZFS version inside a VirtualBox machine. So far
> it works for me without crashes, but I got some observations worth
> mentioning. Here are the steps I made:
>
> 1. Installed 8.1-RELEASE (from minimal install CD)
> 2.
I started to check the new ZFS version inside a VirtualBox machine. So far
it works for me without crashes, but I got some observations worth
mentioning. Here are the steps I made:
1. Installed 8.1-RELEASE (from minimal install CD)
2. Csup'ped sources to CURRENT (as of 14/12/2010) [note that
2010/12/13 Pawel Jakub Dawidek :
> Please test, test, test. Chances are this is the last patchset before
> v28 going to HEAD (finally). Especially test new changes, like boot
> support and sendfile(2) support. Also be sure to verify if you can
> import for existing ZFS pools (v13-v15) when running
2010/12/13 Pawel Jakub Dawidek :
> Please test, test, test. Chances are this is the last patchset before
> v28 going to HEAD (finally). Especially test new changes, like boot
> support and sendfile(2) support. Also be sure to verify if you can
> import for existing ZFS pools (v13-v15) when running
First of all, thank pjd@, mm@ and others who made zfs go ahead in
FreeBSD! You are absolutely monsters!
Now one question, what I do wrong, that I can't use /boot/zfsboot to
boot MBR+zfs-only FreeBSD?
More info. If I use /boot/zfsboot form recent STABLE (from snapshot CD
or built myself) to boo
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 10:15:00PM -0500, ben wilber wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 10:45:56PM +0100, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > The new patchset is ready for testing:
>
> Running fine for 24 hours now under load with a ~50 disk v15 (not
> upgraded) pool from -CURRENT. Thanks!
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 10:45:56PM +0100, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> Hi.
>
> The new patchset is ready for testing:
Running fine for 24 hours now under load with a ~50 disk v15 (not
upgraded) pool from -CURRENT. Thanks!
Only strange thing is the rc script complains:
/etc/rc: DEBUG: run_rc_co
Jakub Dawidek
Sent: December-14-10 11:44 AM
To: Olivier Smedts
Cc: freebsd...@freebsd.org; freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Steven Hartland;
m...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Next ZFSv28 patchset ready for testing.
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 03:20:05PM +0100, Olivier Smedts wrote:
> > make installw
Anonymous writes:
> $ zfs allow
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/usr/lib/zfs/pyzfs.py", line 35, in
> import zfs.util
> File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/zfs/util.py", line 31, in
>
> import solaris.misc
> ImportError: No module named solaris.misc
> Exit
Pawel Jakub Dawidek writes:
> Hi.
>
> The new patchset is ready for testing:
>
> http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/patches/zfs_20101212.patch.bz2
>
> When applying the patch be sure to use correct options for patch(1)!:
>
> # cd /usr/src
> # fetch http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/pat
Thanks for the notice.
I have found the cause of this error (wrong constants), tested the code
in both directions again (v15->v28 and v28->v15) + fixed it in perforce.
Bugfix patch (apply after pjd's patch):
http://people.freebsd.org/~mm/patches/zfs/v28/head-zfs_ioctl_compat.c.patch
Dňa 14.12.20
2010/12/14 Pawel Jakub Dawidek :
> On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 03:20:05PM +0100, Olivier Smedts wrote:
>> > make installworld
>>
>> That's what I wanted to do, and why I rebooted single-user on the new
>> kernel. But isn't the v13-v15 userland supposed to work with the v28
>> kernel ?
>
> Yes, it is su
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 03:20:05PM +0100, Olivier Smedts wrote:
> > make installworld
>
> That's what I wanted to do, and why I rebooted single-user on the new
> kernel. But isn't the v13-v15 userland supposed to work with the v28
> kernel ?
Yes, it is suppose to work. Exactly to be able to follo
- Original Message -
From: "Olivier Smedts"
make installworld
That's what I wanted to do, and why I rebooted single-user on the new
kernel. But isn't the v13-v15 userland supposed to work with the v28
kernel ?
Not if you have just upgrade from 8-STABLE to Current.
Regards
Ste
2010/12/14 Steven Hartland :
> - Original Message - From: "Olivier Smedts"
>
>> I tried it on my 8-STABLE box (root zpool v15 on 2 mirrored vdevs with
>> an usb l2 cache). I checked-out CURRENT sources with svn, applied the
>> patch (it applied cleanly). Did not modify kernel config (no
>>
- Original Message -
From: "Olivier Smedts"
I tried it on my 8-STABLE box (root zpool v15 on 2 mirrored vdevs with
an usb l2 cache). I checked-out CURRENT sources with svn, applied the
patch (it applied cleanly). Did not modify kernel config (no
debugging) or make.conf. buildworld, bui
2010/12/13 Pawel Jakub Dawidek :
> Hi.
>
> The new patchset is ready for testing:
>
> http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/patches/zfs_20101212.patch.bz2
>
> When applying the patch be sure to use correct options for patch(1)!:
>
> # cd /usr/src
> # fetch http://people.freebsd.org/~p
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 11:00:31PM -, Steven Hartland wrote:
> What's the expected behaviour for the sendfile changes as
> sendfile is one of the problems we have here with the
> double memory allocation required for it under ZFS compared
> to UFS. Does this patch address that?
No. The patch d
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 10:45:56PM +0100, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> Hi.
>
> The new patchset is ready for testing:
>
> http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/patches/zfs_20101212.patch.bz2
You can also download the whole source tree already patched from here:
http://people.freebsd.org/
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 10:45:56PM +0100, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> Hi.
>
> The new patchset is ready for testing:
>
> http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/patches/zfs_20101212.patch.bz2
>
> When applying the patch be sure to use correct options for patch(1)!:
>
> # cd /usr/src
>
Hi.
The new patchset is ready for testing:
http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/patches/zfs_20101212.patch.bz2
When applying the patch be sure to use correct options for patch(1)!:
# cd /usr/src
# fetch http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/patches/zfs_20101212.patch.bz2
# bz
37 matches
Mail list logo
