Re: New Mbuf Allocator (some graphs)

2001-06-16 Thread Bosko Milekic
On Sat, Jun 16, 2001 at 03:11:21AM -0400, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > It would be better if we could allocate/free clusters+mbufs+refcounts > under a single lock. It would simplify the API and save a boatload > of cycles and i-cache by avoiding the mutex operations. > > Not that I object to the c

Re: New Mbuf Allocator (some graphs)

2001-06-15 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* Jonathan Lemon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010616 00:56] wrote: > On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 07:44:59PM -0400, Bosko Milekic wrote: > > > > > Here are some performance results. Keep in mind that we're still under > > > > Giant. > > > > > > > > http://people.freebsd.org/~bmilekic/code/mb_alloc/results.

Re: New Mbuf Allocator (some graphs)

2001-06-15 Thread Jonathan Lemon
On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 07:44:59PM -0400, Bosko Milekic wrote: > > > Here are some performance results. Keep in mind that we're still under > > > Giant. > > > > > > http://people.freebsd.org/~bmilekic/code/mb_alloc/results.html > > > > Just for comparision, 6-way results are at: > > > >

Re: New Mbuf Allocator (some graphs)

2001-06-15 Thread Bosko Milekic
On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 06:55:29PM -0500, Jonathan Lemon wrote: > > In any case, the mb_alloc code you used still has the malloc() and > > free() calls during cluster allocation and freeing and still, it looks to > > me as very comparable nonetheless. > > The results look good to me; the on

Re: New Mbuf Allocator (some graphs)

2001-06-15 Thread Jonathan Lemon
On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 07:44:59PM -0400, Bosko Milekic wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 06:32:55PM -0500, Jonathan Lemon wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 06:54:21PM -0400, Bosko Milekic wrote: > > > > > > Hi Folks, > > > > > > Here are some performance results. Keep in mind that we're st

Re: New Mbuf Allocator (some graphs)

2001-06-15 Thread Bosko Milekic
On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 06:32:55PM -0500, Jonathan Lemon wrote: > On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 06:54:21PM -0400, Bosko Milekic wrote: > > > > Hi Folks, > > > > Here are some performance results. Keep in mind that we're still under > > Giant. > > > > http://people.freebsd.org/~bmilekic/code/mb_all

Re: New Mbuf Allocator (some graphs)

2001-06-15 Thread Jonathan Lemon
On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 06:54:21PM -0400, Bosko Milekic wrote: > > Hi Folks, > > Here are some performance results. Keep in mind that we're still under > Giant. > > http://people.freebsd.org/~bmilekic/code/mb_alloc/results.html Just for comparision, 6-way results are at: http://www.flug

New Mbuf Allocator (some graphs)

2001-06-15 Thread Bosko Milekic
Hi Folks, Here are some performance results. Keep in mind that we're still under Giant. http://people.freebsd.org/~bmilekic/code/mb_alloc/results.html Terry, is this OK for you? Regards, -- Bosko Milekic [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscri