On 2018/01/08 00:34, Chris H wrote:
On Sun, 7 Jan 2018 23:05:44 -0500 said
1) if sendmail is disabled during installation, have periodic's
output logged to files (per example in
https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?periodic(8) )
2) make this the default anyway (logging to files), arguably th
On Mon, 8 Jan 2018 22:26:14 -0500 "Mark Heily" said
On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 10:26 AM, Rodney W. Grimes <
freebsd-...@pdx.rh.cn85.dnsmgr.net> wrote:
> > 1) if sendmail is disabled during installation, have periodic's output
> > logged to files (per example in
> > https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.
On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 10:26 AM, Rodney W. Grimes <
freebsd-...@pdx.rh.cn85.dnsmgr.net> wrote:
> > 1) if sendmail is disabled during installation, have periodic's output
> > logged to files (per example in
> > https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?periodic(8) )
>
> I would not make this option depen
> 1) if sendmail is disabled during installation, have periodic's output
> logged to files (per example in
> https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?periodic(8) )
I would not make this option dependent on sendmail, it should just
be a stand alone set of options
"Do you want logs"
On Sun, 7 Jan 2018 23:05:44 -0500 said
1) if sendmail is disabled during installation, have periodic's output
logged to files (per example in
https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?periodic(8) )
2) make this the default anyway (logging to files), arguably the vast
majority of systems' reportin
1) if sendmail is disabled during installation, have periodic's output
logged to files (per example in
https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?periodic(8) )
2) make this the default anyway (logging to files), arguably the vast
majority of systems' reporting is ignored :)
At least now it could be
