On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, Bruce Evans wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, Daniel Eischen wrote:
>
> > - ret = set_fpcontext(td, &ucp->uc_mcontext);
> > - if (ret != 0)
> > - return (ret);
> > + /*
> > +* Intentionally ignore the error to keep binary
On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> At the end is a potentially longer term fix for the ABI
> breakage that was introduced when the i386 mcontext_t
> was changed/enlarged.
>
> Someone other than I (Bruce?) should vet this. It should
> solve the libc_r binary compatibility problem, but i
On Tue, 1 Oct 2002, Jake Burkholder wrote:
> Apparently, On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 11:12:02AM -0400,
> Daniel Eischen said words to the effect of;
>
> > On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, Peter Wemm wrote:
> > > Longer term, I was thining that we could/should do what sparc64 does, ie:
> > > libc provides t
Apparently, On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 11:12:02AM -0400,
Daniel Eischen said words to the effect of;
> On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, Peter Wemm wrote:
>
> > Daniel Eischen wrote:
> > > At the end is a potentially longer term fix for the ABI
> > > breakage that was introduced when the i386 mcontext_t
On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, Peter Wemm wrote:
> Daniel Eischen wrote:
> > At the end is a potentially longer term fix for the ABI
> > breakage that was introduced when the i386 mcontext_t
> > was changed/enlarged.
>
> > - ret = set_fpcontext(td, &ucp->uc_mcontext);
> > - if (ret !=
Daniel Eischen wrote:
> At the end is a potentially longer term fix for the ABI
> breakage that was introduced when the i386 mcontext_t
> was changed/enlarged.
> - ret = set_fpcontext(td, &ucp->uc_mcontext);
> - if (ret != 0)
> - return (ret);
> +
At the end is a potentially longer term fix for the ABI
breakage that was introduced when the i386 mcontext_t
was changed/enlarged.
Someone other than I (Bruce?) should vet this. It should
solve the libc_r binary compatibility problem, but it may
not fix everything. Applications that copy ucont