Re: Library question/challenge

1999-07-31 Thread Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai
* John Polstra ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [990731 09:28]: > Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai wrote: > > * John Polstra ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [990729 18:49]: > >> > >> Right. So the problem must be that you have LD_LIBRARY_PATH set. > > > > Yes I have, but this hasn't been a problem for the last 5-6 months. > > In

Re: Library question/challenge

1999-07-30 Thread John Polstra
Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai wrote: > * John Polstra ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [990729 18:49]: >> >> Right. So the problem must be that you have LD_LIBRARY_PATH set. > > Yes I have, but this hasn't been a problem for the last 5-6 months. > In what way could it interfere with my ldconfig then? (I read man 1

Re: Library question/challenge

1999-07-29 Thread David O'Brien
> I think, a guess, that make world without -DWANT_AOUT in conjunction with Unless you are trying to support current development of a.out binaries, there is little need to be useing "-DWANT_AOUT". All you want is suport for existing 2.2.x a.out binaries (since that is what Netscape is). Realize

Re: Library question/challenge

1999-07-29 Thread Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai
* John Polstra ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [990729 18:49]: > Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai wrote: > > Well, it seems to want libc.so.3.1 and that one is present in /usr/lib/aout > > and is grepable from ldconfig -aout -r: > > > > [asmodai@daemon:/usr/home/asmodai] (3) $ ldconfig -aout -r | grep libc.so > >

Re: Library question/challenge

1999-07-29 Thread John Polstra
Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai wrote: > * Matthew Dillon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [990729 07:20]: >> lib/libc.so.3: minor version -1 older >> :> than expected 0, using it anyway >> :> ld.so failed: bad magic number in "/usr/lib/libc.so.3" Look, it's finding its library in "/usr/lib" and it shouldn't be doing

Re: Library question/challenge

1999-07-28 Thread Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai
* John Polstra ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [990729 07:20]: > Run ldd on the netscape binary and figure out why it's finding the > wrong libc. Make sure you don't have LD_LIBRARY_PATH set to include > "/usr/lib". Well, I needed to update netscape anyways, so I rm'd the old binaries and proceeded to inst

Re: Library question/challenge

1999-07-28 Thread Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai
* Matthew Dillon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [990729 07:20]: > lib/libc.so.3: minor version -1 older > :> than expected 0, using it anyway > :> ld.so failed: bad magic number in "/usr/lib/libc.so.3" > :> > :> This is netscape4.5 on CURRENT tracked since October 1998. > :> > :> /var/run/ld.so.hints: > :>

Re: Library question/challenge

1999-07-28 Thread Matthew Dillon
:> /usr/libexec/ld.so: warning: /usr/lib/libc.so.3: minor version -1 older :> than expected 0, using it anyway :> ld.so failed: bad magic number in "/usr/lib/libc.so.3" :> :> This is netscape4.5 on CURRENT tracked since October 1998. :> :> /var/run/ld.so.hints: :> search directories: /us

Re: Library question/challenge

1999-07-28 Thread John Polstra
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > /usr/libexec/ld.so: warning: /usr/lib/libc.so.3: minor version -1 older > than expected 0, using it anyway > ld.so failed: bad magic number in "/usr/lib/libc.so.3" > > This is netscape4.5 on CURRENT tracked si

Library question/challenge

1999-07-27 Thread Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai
[ in case this should've been -questions, please redirect this thread there ] Hi, after a make world on the 26th I tried to start netscape today and got a library error: /usr/libexec/ld.so: warning: /usr/lib/libc.so.3: minor version -1 older than expected 0, using it anyway ld.so failed: bad