Re: Last round of sendmail startup changes in place

2002-04-11 Thread Bill Fenner
>Masquerading shouldn't need to be in submit.mc either -- the MTA should do >any masquerading. The only catch here is for people who may be using >limited masquerading and not masquerading the fully qualified hostname of >submitted mail. Some broken tests made me think that the MTA wouldn't mas

Re: Last round of sendmail startup changes in place

2002-04-09 Thread Gregory Neil Shapiro
fenner> Anyway, that was really a long way of saying: should this be fenner> documented somewhere? Like, prominently in the mailq man page? I'll add something to the man page. I've also updated /etc/periodic/daily/{440.status-mailq,500.queuerun}. fenner> And, addressing the initial failure its

Re: Last round of sendmail startup changes in place

2002-04-05 Thread Bill Fenner
BTW, not that this is particularly related to startup scripts, but -- I found it quite frustrating that due to a transient failure at submission time, my mail went into /var/spool/clientmqueue, for which you have to use "mailq -Ac", which is pretty much completely undocumented. It turned out OK

Last round of sendmail startup changes in place

2002-04-04 Thread Gregory Neil Shapiro
As discussed earlier in the mailing list, I've committed what will hopefully be the final round of sendmail startup changes: --- start of forwarded message (RFC 934 encapsulation) --- From: Gregory Neil Shapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: cvs comm