On Tue, 9 Jul 2002, Robert Watson wrote:
>
> On Tue, 9 Jul 2002, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> > > If anyone knows of something that was broken by the KSE commit,
> > > (i.e. it worked just before and not after) and is STILL
> > > broken please let me know because I think I can pretty much declare
On Tue, 9 Jul 2002, John Baldwin wrote:
> > If anyone knows of something that was broken by the KSE commit,
> > (i.e. it worked just before and not after) and is STILL
> > broken please let me know because I think I can pretty much declare that
> > chapter finished, and I'd like to get on with "
On Monday 2002-July-08 19:47, Don Lewis wrote:
> On 8 Jul, Anthony Jenkins wrote:
> > I've been looking at the pcm code and I can see where it locks, then
> > allocates memory with the M_WAITOK flag thing. I'm wondering if there's
> > a standard procedure for fixing these... would I just nail do
On 06-Jul-2002 Julian Elischer wrote:
>
> Well with various hints from here and there I have fixed
> the ^Z/fg problem (at least it seems fixed to me and others that
> have tested) This basically leaves only one outstanding
> problem that I know of which is a problem that Warner has with a
> pa
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 07:28:50PM -0400, Anthony Jenkins wrote:
>
> I finally shelled out Radio Shack's ridiculous amount for a null modem cable
> and can do remote debugging now, but I can't remember the URL for that recent
> series of articles on getting started with CURRENT debugging...anyo
On Sun, 7 Jul 2002, Josef Karthauser wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 06, 2002 at 04:57:08PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
> > Well with various hints from here and there I have fixed
> > the ^Z/fg problem (at least it seems fixed to me and others that
> > have tested) This basically leaves only one outstan
On 8 Jul, Anthony Jenkins wrote:
> I've been looking at the pcm code and I can see where it locks, then allocates
> memory with the M_WAITOK flag thing. I'm wondering if there's a standard
> procedure for fixing these... would I just nail down the malloc to a
> non-sleepable one?
Only if th
On Monday 2002-July-08 14:08, Josef Karthauser wrote:
>
> On a new kernel I appear to be getting dumps now (along with the crashes
> ;). Actually it's pretty stable, but there are random crashes occuring,
> usually I come back to the machine when I've not used it for a new hours
> and find it in
On Sun, Jul 07, 2002 at 12:34:06PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Josef Karthauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> : I've absolutely no idea what's causing it, but I'm still having random reboots
> : of current after some uptime with no dumps. I'll inst
hopefully some of the new work that will be done on kse can be done
on the mainline now without breaking nonKSE activities..
in other words, most of the real "it breaks current behaviour"
changes have been passed for a while so new code can be off in
"if (KSE_mode) { }"
clauses that will have no
On 2002-07-07 11:46 +, Josef Karthauser wrote:
>
> I've absolutely no idea what's causing it, but I'm still having random reboots
> of current after some uptime with no dumps. I'll install a new kernel
> today and report back if it still happens. Maybe someone can help me to
> track it down
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Josef Karthauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: I've absolutely no idea what's causing it, but I'm still having random reboots
: of current after some uptime with no dumps. I'll install a new kernel
: today and report back if it still happens. Maybe som
On Sat, Jul 06, 2002 at 04:57:08PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
>
> Well with various hints from here and there I have fixed
> the ^Z/fg problem (at least it seems fixed to me and others that
> have tested) This basically leaves only one outstanding
> problem that I know of which is a problem t
On Sat, Jul 06, 2002 at 04:57:08PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
> Well with various hints from here and there I have fixed
> the ^Z/fg problem (at least it seems fixed to me and others that
> have tested) This basically leaves only one outstanding
> problem that I know of which is a problem that
Well with various hints from here and there I have fixed
the ^Z/fg problem (at least it seems fixed to me and others that
have tested) This basically leaves only one outstanding
problem that I know of which is a problem that Warner has with a
particular progam. (This may also be fixed but I don'
On Sun, 30 Jun 2002, Julian Elischer wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sun, 30 Jun 2002, Julian Elischer wrote:
>
>
> Well after 1 day I'm releatively happy..
that's "relatively"
>
> There seem to have been 4 bugs showing themselves..
>
> A machine doing REAL HEAVY work and SWAPPING LIKE CRAZY
> eventua
On Sun, 30 Jun 2002, Julian Elischer wrote:
Well after 1 day I'm releatively happy..
There seem to have been 4 bugs showing themselves..
A machine doing REAL HEAVY work and SWAPPING LIKE CRAZY
eventually paniced. (one instance)
Matt triggered a panic we put into the code and thought
we'd n
well afte a day I'm releatively happy..
there seem to be 4 bugs showing themselves..
plus one braino I just fixed..
(there was a bug where ps would panic the kernel
when it got to a zombie process because it tried to
print thread info but ther eis no thread).
in addition the following problems
18 matches
Mail list logo