On Thu, 2003-11-06 at 21:09, RMH wrote:
> Roberto de Iriarte wrote:
> >
> > Scott Likens wrote:
> >
> > >On Thu, 2003-11-06 at 03:27, Tom wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >>On Thu, 6 Nov 2003, Scott Likens wrote:
> > >>
> > >>...
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>>Onboard SCSI, 1gig of ECC, dual P2-450's. Never had thi
Roberto de Iriarte wrote:
>
> Scott Likens wrote:
>
> >On Thu, 2003-11-06 at 03:27, Tom wrote:
> >
> >
> >>On Thu, 6 Nov 2003, Scott Likens wrote:
> >>
> >>...
> >>
> >>
> >>>Onboard SCSI, 1gig of ECC, dual P2-450's. Never had this problem
> >>>before.
> >>>
> >>>
> >> I hope you are using P3s,
Scott Likens wrote:
On Thu, 2003-11-06 at 03:27, Tom wrote:
On Thu, 6 Nov 2003, Scott Likens wrote:
...
Onboard SCSI, 1gig of ECC, dual P2-450's. Never had this problem
before.
I hope you are using P3s, or Xeon CPUs not P2s, since P2s are not able
to cache memory above 512MB, whi
On Thu, 2003-11-06 at 03:27, Tom wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Nov 2003, Scott Likens wrote:
>
> ...
> > Onboard SCSI, 1gig of ECC, dual P2-450's. Never had this problem
> > before.
>
> I hope you are using P3s, or Xeon CPUs not P2s, since P2s are not able
> to cache memory above 512MB, which means that
On Thu, 6 Nov 2003, Scott Likens wrote:
...
> Onboard SCSI, 1gig of ECC, dual P2-450's. Never had this problem
> before.
I hope you are using P3s, or Xeon CPUs not P2s, since P2s are not able
to cache memory above 512MB, which means that things will be real slow.
> Quite rare.
>
> Thanks
> -
stupidly tookout
the debugger.
This isn't my normal email address also so if you could send reply's to
this email address.
I was wondering most of all if anyone else with an Intel I440GX+ P2-450
roughly was experiencing problems?
Onboard SCSI, 1gig of ECC, dual P2-450's. Never
