Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> mp3blaster-3.1.3
I have a patch, will talk to maintainer.
--
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listin
On Wednesday 24 September 2003 19:36, Bruce M Simpson wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 06:14:52PM +0200, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> Content-Description: signed data
>
> > On Wednesday 24 September 2003 04:18, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > > icecast-1.3.12_1
> >
> > I don't have a -CURRENT machine to te
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 06:14:52PM +0200, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
Content-Description: signed data
> On Wednesday 24 September 2003 04:18, Kris Kennaway wrote:
>
> > icecast-1.3.12_1
>
> I don't have a -CURRENT machine to test with. I don't mind the port marked
> BROKEN, since it's unsupported
On Wednesday 24 September 2003 04:18, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> icecast-1.3.12_1
I don't have a -CURRENT machine to test with. I don't mind the port marked
BROKEN, since it's unsupported abandonware and due for deorbit anyway.
--
,_, | Michael Nottebrock | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(/
* Will Andrews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030924 01:50]:
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 01:34:13AM -0400, Michael Edenfield wrote:
> > One very important group of ports that should get looked at when this
> > gets worked out is KDE. Apparently, Qt uses a different means of
> > determining wether to use threa
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 07:18:21PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> pwlib-1.5.0_2
I have sent patches for pwlib and gnomemeeting to the maintainer
shortly after the gnome2.4 import, and he said they would be commited
(with a slight modification) when the ports freeze was lifted.
--
Morten Rodal
__
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Here is a partial list of the ports that need to be taught to respect
PTHREAD_LIBS and PTHREAD_CFLAGS, from the latest 5.x package build (I
[skipped]
omniORB-4.0.2
PR/56862 is waiting for ports unfreezing.
--
Sem.
___
[EMAIL PROTEC
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 02:11:53AM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Sep 2003, Stijn Hoop wrote:
> > Just an idea (I hope this hasn't been said before in the mega thread but at
> > least I didn't get it this way):
> >
> > - fix all ports to respect PTHREAD_LIBS _ON THE LINKING STAGE_ (so n
On Wed, 24 Sep 2003, Stijn Hoop wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 01:49:50AM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> > If FreeBSD wants to take the simple approach and only support
> > one thread library in ports (-pthread == -lpthread) and not
> > make it selectable via PTHREAD_LIBS, then its not a problem
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 08:01:35AM +0200, Stijn Hoop wrote:
> - fix all ports to respect PTHREAD_LIBS _ON THE LINKING STAGE_ (so no
> global search & replace, for it shouldn't be used in compile command lines)
> - keep '-pthread' as a compiler option, which maps to a NOOP for compiling
> and '-
On Wed, 24 Sep 2003, John Birrell wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 01:49:50AM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> > It would be nice to be able to support all our thread
> > libraries, but I grow weary.
>
> I grow weary yesterday.
You've just been around a little longer than I have!
--
Dan Eischen
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 01:49:50AM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> If FreeBSD wants to take the simple approach and only support
> one thread library in ports (-pthread == -lpthread) and not
> make it selectable via PTHREAD_LIBS, then its not a problem.
> It would be nice to be able to support all o
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 01:49:50AM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> It would be nice to be able to support all our thread
> libraries, but I grow weary.
I grow weary yesterday.
--
John Birrell
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/m
On Wed, 24 Sep 2003, Michael Edenfield wrote:
> * Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030923 22:21]:
>
> > Here is a partial list of the ports that need to be taught to respect
> > PTHREAD_LIBS and PTHREAD_CFLAGS, from the latest 5.x package build (I
> > just grepped for the "-pthread is deprecate
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 01:34:13AM -0400, Michael Edenfield wrote:
> One very important group of ports that should get looked at when this
> gets worked out is KDE. Apparently, Qt uses a different means of
> determining wether to use threading, than the ports that depend on it.
> The qt-using port
* Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030923 22:21]:
> Here is a partial list of the ports that need to be taught to respect
> PTHREAD_LIBS and PTHREAD_CFLAGS, from the latest 5.x package build (I
> just grepped for the "-pthread is deprecated" error message). None of
One very important group of
On Wed, 24 Sep 2003, John Birrell wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 07:33:43PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > Won't these ports still need to be fixed to look at
> > PTHREAD_{LIBS,CFLAGS} though, since the correct values for 4.x and 5.x
> > will still be different?
>
> Not if -pthread remains. In
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 12:43:54PM +1000, John Birrell wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 07:33:43PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > Won't these ports still need to be fixed to look at
> > PTHREAD_{LIBS,CFLAGS} though, since the correct values for 4.x and 5.x
> > will still be different?
>
> Not if
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 07:33:43PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> Won't these ports still need to be fixed to look at
> PTHREAD_{LIBS,CFLAGS} though, since the correct values for 4.x and 5.x
> will still be different?
Not if -pthread remains. Internally gcc would link to a different
library, but mo
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 12:32:05PM +1000, John Birrell wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 07:18:21PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > Here is a partial list of the ports that need to be taught to respect
> > PTHREAD_LIBS and PTHREAD_CFLAGS, from the latest 5.x package build (I
> > just grepped for the
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 07:18:21PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> Here is a partial list of the ports that need to be taught to respect
> PTHREAD_LIBS and PTHREAD_CFLAGS, from the latest 5.x package build (I
> just grepped for the "-pthread is deprecated" error message). None of
> these were fixed
Here is a partial list of the ports that need to be taught to respect
PTHREAD_LIBS and PTHREAD_CFLAGS, from the latest 5.x package build (I
just grepped for the "-pthread is deprecated" error message). None of
these were fixed by ports/57047. It is likely that there are many
more that also need t
22 matches
Mail list logo
