On 12/7/2010 6:07 AM, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Dec 2010, Alexander Motin wrote:
>
>>> Does mpd work in -current ? Last tried I, netgraph had problems with
>>> mpd.
>>
>> Sure it does! What is the problem?
>
> There have been several reports (incl. panics) on various lists like
> net, sta
On Tue, 7 Dec 2010, Alexander Motin wrote:
Does mpd work in -current ? Last tried I, netgraph had problems with mpd.
Sure it does! What is the problem?
There have been several reports (incl. panics) on various lists like
net, stable, ... during the last months for mostly 8.x (and HEAD).
None
On 06.12.2010 03:45, David Rhodus wrote:
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 6:32 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 05/12/2010 22:30 Julian Elischer said the following:
On 12/5/10 9:30 AM, Bernd Walter wrote:
On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 12:14:21PM -0500, Pierre Lamy wrote:
Just curious about why the in-kernel
On Mon, 6 Dec 2010, Andriy Gapon wrote:
BTW, there is a rumor that mpd may become an 'in source' program too.
It comes 'in source';-)
I think last time it came up for base, the package ended up being in
the dataset of the release packages and I think that's fine enough.
I cannot see any advan
David Rhodus wrote:
> Does mpd work in -current ? Last tried I, netgraph had problems with mpd.
I have successfully used it on -CURRENT as late as:
FreeBSD mini 9.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #16: Wed Nov 17 07:11:06 SAST 2010
i...@mini:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/APPLE i386
Ian
--
Ian Freisli
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 6:32 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 05/12/2010 22:30 Julian Elischer said the following:
>> On 12/5/10 9:30 AM, Bernd Walter wrote:
>>> On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 12:14:21PM -0500, Pierre Lamy wrote:
>>>> Just curious about why the in-kernel PP
Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> as I never got around to installing mpd and it "did the job".
> BTW, there is a rumor that mpd may become an 'in source' program too.
Not to paraphrase the muppet show, but...
'the question is... who cares?' :>
--
This e-mail was sponsored by the letters 'please GTFO with
on 05/12/2010 22:30 Julian Elischer said the following:
> On 12/5/10 9:30 AM, Bernd Walter wrote:
>> On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 12:14:21PM -0500, Pierre Lamy wrote:
>>> Just curious about why the in-kernel PPPoE interface was never ported
>>> from NetBSD or OpenBSD, to Fr
On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 12:30:16PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
> On 12/5/10 9:30 AM, Bernd Walter wrote:
> >On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 12:14:21PM -0500, Pierre Lamy wrote:
> >>Just curious about why the in-kernel PPPoE interface was never ported
> >>from NetBSD or OpenB
On 12/5/10 9:30 AM, Bernd Walter wrote:
On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 12:14:21PM -0500, Pierre Lamy wrote:
Just curious about why the in-kernel PPPoE interface was never ported
from NetBSD or OpenBSD, to FreeBSD. Does anyone know why?
Maybe because everyone who cares about in-kernel uses the FreeBSD
Pierre Lamy wrote:
> Just curious about why the in-kernel PPPoE interface was never ported
> from NetBSD or OpenBSD, to FreeBSD. Does anyone know why?
> From using it for a long time in OpenBSD I always found it quite stable
> and easy to use.
Have you tried netgra
On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 12:14:21PM -0500, Pierre Lamy wrote:
> Just curious about why the in-kernel PPPoE interface was never ported
> from NetBSD or OpenBSD, to FreeBSD. Does anyone know why?
Maybe because everyone who cares about in-kernel uses the FreeBSD
in-kernel ng_pppoe via mpd?
Just curious about why the in-kernel PPPoE interface was never ported
from NetBSD or OpenBSD, to FreeBSD. Does anyone know why?
From using it for a long time in OpenBSD I always found it quite stable
and easy to use.
-Pierre
___
freebsd-current
13 matches
Mail list logo
