On Wednesday 26 November 2003 01:40 pm, Sean Chittenden wrote:
> > > Is my expectation wrong or is there a pertinent IPFW2 bug in a current
> > > 5.2-BETA kernel?
> >
> > You're alone in this, though cjc hasn't been able to reproduce this.
>
>^^^
>not
>
> > Are you on a multi-homed
> > Is my expectation wrong or is there a pertinent IPFW2 bug in a current
> > 5.2-BETA kernel?
>
> You're alone in this, though cjc hasn't been able to reproduce this.
^^^
not
> Are you on a multi-homed system? -sc
Ack! If ever there was a missing word to change the meaning of a
On Tue, 25 Nov 2003, Sean Chittenden wrote:
> > Is my expectation wrong or is there a pertinent IPFW2 bug in a current
> > 5.2-BETA kernel?
>
> You're alone in this, though cjc hasn't been able to reproduce this.
> Are you on a multi-homed system? -sc
Sort of. I do have three xl(4) NICs in my s
> Is my expectation wrong or is there a pertinent IPFW2 bug in a current
> 5.2-BETA kernel?
You're alone in this, though cjc hasn't been able to reproduce this.
Are you on a multi-homed system? -sc
--
Sean Chittenden
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Hi,
I seem to have difficulties with verrevpath in IPFW2 (current kernel,
cvsupped a few hours ago) which APPEARS to not match - or am I too
whatever to configure ipfw2 properly?
Excerpt from "ipfw show":
| 0010038 3216 allow ip from any to any via lo0
| 00200 0 0 deny ip from any
