Not sure if a fix was ever implemented for this problem directly, but I
thought I'd note that the problem I experienced mounting my NTFS partition
has gone away. I hadn't tried it for a while, so I don't know the exact
date/commit that did the deed.
Thanks!
--
Jason Young, CCIE #8607, MCSE
Sr.
Attempting to mount my Win2K NTFS partition on my laptop after the
introduction of GEOM results in immediate 100% reproduceable panics. I
built GEOM into my kernel the day after it was introduced into CVS, and
none of the commits made since seem to have fixed it.
I apologize for not posting my p
÷ Mon, 30.09.2002, × 23:09, Poul-Henning Kamp ÎÁÐÉÓÁÌ:
>
> Provided nothing terminal pops up in the next 5 days, GEOM will
> become default in -current on Saturday 5th of october.
>
> Please test it now on _your_ configuration and tell me if it
> fails to work.
Ok, diskcheckd (old binary) no is
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Daniel Flickinger writes:
>Do you have a complete live tree somewhere I could
>'fetch' or ftp? Since the errors have been continuing
>for a week, it looks like I either walk forward from
>17 Sep again, or
It would help here if you told us what
On Sat, 5 Oct 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Daniel Flickinger writes:
>
> >I will note that my loader is dated 27 Sep since there
> >has not been an even close to complete buildworld since
> >then;
>
> Something in your tree is not OK then, because
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Daniel Flickinger writes:
>I will note that my loader is dated 27 Sep since there
>has not been an even close to complete buildworld since
>then;
Something in your tree is not OK then, because I have compiled
buildworld many times since the 27th, last
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Eric Hodel writes:
>
>--wRRV7LY7NUeQGEoC
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>Content-Disposition: inline
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
>Poul-Henning Kamp ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
>> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Eric Hodel writes:
>>=
Poul-Henning Kamp ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Eric Hodel writes:
>
> >the bit that I cant figure out is that my CD-ROM won't mount the
> >CD I've got in it now, (an 80 minute CDR) but it has pre-geom.
>
> Yes, there is a problem with SCSI-CD devices.
>
> Can yo
On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 07:20:38AM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Eric Hodel writes:
>
> >the bit that I cant figure out is that my CD-ROM won't mount the
> >CD I've got in it now, (an 80 minute CDR) but it has pre-geom.
>
> Yes, there is a problem with SCSI-CD
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Eric Hodel writes:
>the bit that I cant figure out is that my CD-ROM won't mount the
>CD I've got in it now, (an 80 minute CDR) but it has pre-geom.
Yes, there is a problem with SCSI-CD devices.
Can you please try this patch:
http://phk.freebsd.dk
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> Provided nothing terminal pops up in the next 5 days, GEOM will
> become default in -current on Saturday 5th of october.
>
> Please test it now on _your_ configuration and tell me if it
> fails to work.
A few of my slices got shuffled about, but that was an easy fix,
t
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> Provided nothing terminal pops up in the next 5 days, GEOM will
> become default in -current on Saturday 5th of october.
>
> Please test it now on _your_ configuration and tell me if it
> fails to work.
When I enable geom, vinum won't start claiming it can't find its d
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Andrew Gallatin w
rites:
>
>Poul-Henning Kamp writes:
> >
> > Provided nothing terminal pops up in the next 5 days, GEOM will
> > become default in -current on Saturday 5th of october.
> >
> > Please test it now on _your_ configuration and tell me if it
> > fails
Poul-Henning Kamp writes:
>
> Provided nothing terminal pops up in the next 5 days, GEOM will
> become default in -current on Saturday 5th of october.
>
> Please test it now on _your_ configuration and tell me if it
> fails to work.
>
What, exactly, would you like tested?
options GE
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bruce Evans writes:
>This could have been done without devfs by mapping names of special files
>to numeric indexes in the kernel. Putting the index in the inode is mainly
>an efficiency hack. Numeric indexes work quite well in the kernel (better
>than pointers in
On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bruce Evans writes:
> >I don't really like MAKEDEV. It is creating work and bugs by moving
> >problems around that I object to.
>
> So you don't like DEVFS and you don't like MAKEDEV.
>
> Say, how _do_ you access your
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bruce Evans writes:
>On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
>
>> On (2002/10/02 16:27), Bruce Evans wrote:
>>
>> > It is a devfs issue that devfs moves things into the kernel where they
>> > harder to control and more fatal if they are got wrong.
>>
>> If it's jus
On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Sheldon Hearn writes:
> >...
> >In fact, as the loudest supporter of MAKEDEV, you might be the best
> >person to drive its transcription into /etc/defaults/devfs.conf. :-)
>
> And with devfs(8), you can enact your pers
On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
> On (2002/10/02 16:27), Bruce Evans wrote:
>
> > It is a devfs issue that devfs moves things into the kernel where they
> > harder to control and more fatal if they are got wrong.
>
> If it's just ownerships and permissions you're worried about, I think
>
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Sheldon Hearn writes:
>On (2002/10/02 16:27), Bruce Evans wrote:
>
>> It is a devfs issue that devfs moves things into the kernel where they
>> harder to control and more fatal if they are got wrong.
>
>If it's just ownerships and permissions you're worried about, I
On (2002/10/02 16:27), Bruce Evans wrote:
> It is a devfs issue that devfs moves things into the kernel where they
> harder to control and more fatal if they are got wrong.
If it's just ownerships and permissions you're worried about, I think
the issue could be made moot by some /etc support for
On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bruce Evans writes:
> >One reason I have no confidence in devfs is that its quality is such as
> >to get things like this wrong. There are magic ownerships and permissions
> >in the source code for N drivers where the
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bruce Evans writes:
>On Tue, 1 Oct 2002, Brooks Davis wrote:
>
>> I just added options GEOM on a kernel from yesterday and noticed today
>> that Amanda failed to dump my disks overnight. The problem is that the
>> entries in /dev have the wrong permissions. They s
On Tue, 1 Oct 2002, Brooks Davis wrote:
> I just added options GEOM on a kernel from yesterday and noticed today
> that Amanda failed to dump my disks overnight. The problem is that the
> entries in /dev have the wrong permissions. They should be readable by
> group operator, but here's what I
On Tuesday, 1 October 2002 at 9:48:59 +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
> On (2002/09/30 21:09), Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
>> Provided nothing terminal pops up in the next 5 days, GEOM will
>> become default in -current on Saturday 5th of october.
>>
>> Please test it now on _your_ configuration and
OK; after building today's -CURRENt on my build machine, I had time to
try building the kernel again, but with GEOM.
3 observations so far:
* Nearly everything still works. :-)
* A verbose boot (my default on the machine in question, since I
often need to check things or quote boot messages)
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Brooks Davis writes:
>I just added options GEOM on a kernel from yesterday and noticed today
>that Amanda failed to dump my disks overnight. The problem is that the
>entries in /dev have the wrong permissions. They should be readable by
>group operator, but here'
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Takahashi Yoshihiro
writes:
>In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Poul-Henning Kamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Provided nothing terminal pops up in the next 5 days, GEOM will
>> become default in -current on Saturday 5th of october.
>>
>> Please test it now on _y
On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 09:09:46PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
> Provided nothing terminal pops up in the next 5 days, GEOM will
> become default in -current on Saturday 5th of october.
>
> Please test it now on _your_ configuration and tell me if it
> fails to work.
I just added options
On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 09:09:46PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> Provided nothing terminal pops up in the next 5 days, GEOM will
> become default in -current on Saturday 5th of october.
>
> Please test it now on _your_ configuration and tell me if it
> fails to work.
I am unable to boot a GEO
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bruce Evans writes:
>On Tue, 1 Oct 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
>> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bruce Evans writes:
>> >On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>> >
>> >> Provided nothing terminal pops up in the next 5 days, GEOM will
>> >> become defau
Sheldon Hearn wrote:
> There are problems in -CURRENT that have held me back from upgrading for
> two weeks. These include X crashes and kernel panics.
FWIW, I haven't seen an X crash since removing the TypeI directory
from my fontpath.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "un
On Tue, 1 Oct 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bruce Evans writes:
> >On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> >
> >> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "David O'Brien" writes:
> >> >What are the exact steps you will take to make it the default; that we
> >> >s
On Tue, 1 Oct 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bruce Evans writes:
> >On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> >
> >> Provided nothing terminal pops up in the next 5 days, GEOM will
> >> become default in -current on Saturday 5th of october.
> >>
> >> Please
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bruce Evans writes:
>On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
>> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "David O'Brien" writes:
>> >On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 09:09:46PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>> >> Provided nothing terminal pops up in the next 5 days, GEOM wi
On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "David O'Brien" writes:
> >On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 09:09:46PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> >> Provided nothing terminal pops up in the next 5 days, GEOM will
> >> become default in -current on Saturday 5th of oct
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bruce Evans writes:
>On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
>> Provided nothing terminal pops up in the next 5 days, GEOM will
>> become default in -current on Saturday 5th of october.
>>
>> Please test it now on _your_ configuration and tell me if it
>> fa
On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> Provided nothing terminal pops up in the next 5 days, GEOM will
> become default in -current on Saturday 5th of october.
>
> Please test it now on _your_ configuration and tell me if it
> fails to work.
It failed to understandard the partitions on
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Sheldon Hearn writes:
>On (2002/09/30 21:09), Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>Maybe you'd get more testers if you wait until the latest serious
>problems are resolved before going ahead.
>
>Maybe you wouldn't, though. So I wouldn't be annoyed if you responded
>with "Wo
On (2002/09/30 21:09), Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> Provided nothing terminal pops up in the next 5 days, GEOM will
> become default in -current on Saturday 5th of october.
>
> Please test it now on _your_ configuration and tell me if it
> fails to work.
There are problems in -CURRENT that have h
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Takahashi Yoshihiro
writes:
>In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Takahashi Yoshihiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Poul-Henning Kamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > Provided nothing terminal pops up in the next 5 days, GEOM wil
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Takahashi Yoshihiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Poul-Henning Kamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Provided nothing terminal pops up in the next 5 days, GEOM will
> > become default in -current on Saturday 5th of october.
> >
>
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Poul-Henning Kamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Provided nothing terminal pops up in the next 5 days, GEOM will
> become default in -current on Saturday 5th of october.
>
> Please test it now on _your_ configuration and tell me if it
> fails to work.
It fails to c
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "David O'Brien" writes:
>On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 09:09:46PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>> Provided nothing terminal pops up in the next 5 days, GEOM will
>> become default in -current on Saturday 5th of october.
>>
>> Please test it now on _your_ configuration
On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 09:09:46PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> Provided nothing terminal pops up in the next 5 days, GEOM will
> become default in -current on Saturday 5th of october.
>
> Please test it now on _your_ configuration and tell me if it
> fails to work.
What are the exact steps
Provided nothing terminal pops up in the next 5 days, GEOM will
become default in -current on Saturday 5th of october.
Please test it now on _your_ configuration and tell me if it
fails to work.
There is one known issue on sparc64 which is being worked: On sparc64
nexus_dmamap_create() calls ma
46 matches
Mail list logo
