In message <19224.926238...@critter.freebsd.dk> Poul-Henning Kamp writes:
: In general any commit to sys/kern/* or sys/sys/* should make you pay
: a LOT of attention.
Also, when the number of commits in these areas has been as high as it
has been lately, one should think twice before updating...
> I think the real problem is that the klds get built with "make world"
> and not with a kernel build. How about changing that?
I've shot myself in the foot this way too. I'd really like to see
modules built as part of the kernel and not userland. As time goes on, I
think we will push more and
Greg Lehey wrote:
>
> I think the real problem is that the klds get built with "make world"
> and not with a kernel build. How about changing that? I've got the
> opposite problem on another machine: I did a make world, but not a
> reboot, and now my Linux emulation is broken.
Same problem with
Greg Lehey wrote:
> On Sunday, 9 May 1999 at 16:15:51 +0800, Peter Wemm wrote:
> > Greg Lehey wrote:
> >> A day or so ago, bdevsw changed from being an array of struct cdevsws
> >> to an inline function. That's not a problem in itself: do a make
> >> world and all will be well. It does, however,
On Sunday, 9 May 1999 at 10:21:57 +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <19990509174914.a22...@freebie.lemis.com>, Greg Lehey writes:
>
>>> People who are running -current for stability had better be damn careful
>>> and be very selective about what they choose to run as a stable snapshot.
In message <19990509174914.a22...@freebie.lemis.com>, Greg Lehey writes:
>> People who are running -current for stability had better be damn careful
>> and be very selective about what they choose to run as a stable snapshot.
>
>I think the real problem is that the klds get built with "make world"
In message <19990509081553.6ab261...@spinner.netplex.com.au>, Peter Wemm write
s:
>Greg Lehey wrote:
>> A day or so ago, bdevsw changed from being an array of struct cdevsws
>> to an inline function. That's not a problem in itself: do a make
>> world and all will be well. It does, however, mean t
On Sunday, 9 May 1999 at 16:15:51 +0800, Peter Wemm wrote:
> Greg Lehey wrote:
>> A day or so ago, bdevsw changed from being an array of struct cdevsws
>> to an inline function. That's not a problem in itself: do a make
>> world and all will be well. It does, however, mean that klds which
>> wer
Greg Lehey wrote:
> A day or so ago, bdevsw changed from being an array of struct cdevsws
> to an inline function. That's not a problem in itself: do a make
> world and all will be well. It does, however, mean that klds which
> were compiled before the change will no longer load. I had a report
A day or so ago, bdevsw changed from being an array of struct cdevsws
to an inline function. That's not a problem in itself: do a make
world and all will be well. It does, however, mean that klds which
were compiled before the change will no longer load. I had a report
today of one person who fo
10 matches
Mail list logo
