At 10:49 AM 4/3/99 -0600, Jacques Vidrine wrote:
>On 3 April 1999 at 7:49, "Kurt D. Zeilenga" wrote:
>[snip]
>> If you mean a version of regex included in the LGPL'ed libc,
>> yes, then this point might be mute. However, if you mean
>> the regex/rx distributions, please, no.
>We're talking about
On 3 April 1999 at 7:49, "Kurt D. Zeilenga" wrote:
[snip]
> If you mean a version of regex included in the LGPL'ed libc,
> yes, then this point might be mute. However, if you mean
> the regex/rx distributions, please, no.
We're talking about gdb, so I mean the GNU regex implementation
that is di
At 03:32 PM 4/2/99 -0600, Jacques Vidrine wrote:
>On 2 April 1999 at 22:25, Doug Rabson wrote:
>> We should also consider installing libbfd. If and when we bring in a newer
>> version of gdb, it would be a good idea to avoid importing yet another
>> version of libiberty and libbfd.
>
>... and GNU
