On Wed, 16 Oct 2002, walt wrote:
> Bruce Evans wrote:
> > On Wed, 16 Oct 2002, walt wrote:
> >
> >>Bruce Evans wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>Don't use extended partitions directly. It is easy to
> >>>make a mess by clobbering the pointers to the logical drive
> >>>within them.
>
> >>I need to ask for cl
Bruce Evans wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Oct 2002, walt wrote:
>
>
>>Bruce Evans wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Don't use extended partitions directly. It is easy to
>>>make a mess by clobbering the pointers to the logical drive
>>>within them.
>>I need to ask for clarification on this point. What do you
>>mean by '
On Wed, 16 Oct 2002, walt wrote:
> Bruce Evans wrote:
>
> > Don't use extended partitions directly. It is easy to
> > make a mess by clobbering the pointers to the logical drive
> > within them.
>
> I need to ask for clarification on this point. What do you
> mean by 'directly'?
Just write to
Bruce Evans wrote:
> Don't use extended partitions directly. It is easy to
> make a mess by clobbering the pointers to the logical drive
> within them.
I need to ask for clarification on this point. What do you
mean by 'directly'?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubs
On Tue, 15 Oct 2002, walt wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bruce Evans) writes:
>
> > On Tue, 15 Oct 2002, walt wrote:
>
> > > Well, disklabel won't work on an extended/logical partition...
>
> > Um, disklabel works on any slice. E.g.:
>
> We have a semantic problem, as often happens when the DOS
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bruce Evans) writes:
> On Tue, 15 Oct 2002, walt wrote:
> > Well, disklabel won't work on an extended/logical partition...
> Um, disklabel works on any slice. E.g.:
> ttyv1:root@gamplex:/tmp> disklabel ad2s3
> #size offsetfstype [fsize bsize bps/cpg]
>
On Tue, 15 Oct 2002, walt wrote:
> Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, walt writes:
> >
> >>Would the GEOM framework make it feasible to use a DOS-extended/logical
> >>partition for a BSD filesystem?
>
> > We already support that as far as I know, both with and without GE
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, walt writes:
>
>>Would the GEOM framework make it feasible to use a DOS-extended/logical
>>partition for a BSD filesystem?
> We already support that as far as I know, both with and without GEOM
Yes! The reason I could never make it w
walt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Would the GEOM framework make it feasible to use a DOS-extended/logical
> partition for a BSD filesystem? This would add a great deal of
> flexibility for adding disk space to a full filesystem, just as one
> example.
You can also use md to do this, I mount my
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, walt writes:
>Would the GEOM framework make it feasible to use a DOS-extended/logical
>partition for a BSD filesystem? This would add a great deal of
>flexibility for adding disk space to a full filesystem, just as one
>example.
We already support that as far as I
Would the GEOM framework make it feasible to use a DOS-extended/logical
partition for a BSD filesystem? This would add a great deal of
flexibility for adding disk space to a full filesystem, just as one
example.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" i
11 matches
Mail list logo