[IPv6-only address above; strip the obvious for IPv4-only mail]
> > ...That is, your kernel can mount the NetBSD partitions with their 16
> > partitions within, even if `disklabel' doesn't work yet...
> Heh, I just mounted the NBSD partition using an un-patched FBSD kernel
> with GEOM, even thou
On Sun, 13 Oct 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jens Schweikhardt writes:
> >On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 05:20:11PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
> >In file included from /src/current/sys/geom/geom_bsd.c:62:
> >/src/current/sys/sys/disklabel.h:174: size of array `_
BOUWSMA Beery wrote:
> ...That is, your kernel can mount the NetBSD partitions with their 16
> partitions within, even if `disklabel' doesn't work yet...
Heh, I just mounted the NBSD partition using an un-patched FBSD kernel
with GEOM, even though disklabel (recompiled) refuses to list it.
Here'
[IPv6-only address above; strip the obvious for IPv4-only mail]
> > We never had to ability to do this before. GEOM can probably do it for
> > you, with something like this patch:
>
> Oops. Now I get the same error with both kinds of partitions:
>
> disklabel: ioctl DIOCGDINFO: Operation not
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jens Schweikhardt writes:
>
>>Poul-Henning et al,
>>
>>recently I've tried installing NetBSD on a new disk. I'm not sure if the
>>following is a coincidence (because it never worked before, even without
>>GEOM) or is due to GEOM issues. M
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jens Schweikhardt writes:
>On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 05:20:11PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>In file included from /src/current/sys/geom/geom_bsd.c:62:
>/src/current/sys/sys/disklabel.h:174: size of array `__assert174' is negative
>*** Error code 1
>
>because of
On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 05:20:11PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
# In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jens Schweikhardt writes:
# >Poul-Henning et al,
# >
# >recently I've tried installing NetBSD on a new disk. I'm not sure if the
# >following is a coincidence (because it never worked before, even
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jens Schweikhardt writes:
>Poul-Henning et al,
>
>recently I've tried installing NetBSD on a new disk. I'm not sure if the
>following is a coincidence (because it never worked before, even without
>GEOM) or is due to GEOM issues. My -current is from Oct 12 and the k
Poul-Henning et al,
recently I've tried installing NetBSD on a new disk. I'm not sure if the
following is a coincidence (because it never worked before, even without
GEOM) or is due to GEOM issues. My -current is from Oct 12 and the kernel
derived from GENERIC, plus/minus devices/options to match
