Gentlefolk,
I have run into a problem building a FreeBSD 9 world & kernel on a
FreeBSD 12.0-CURRENT host.
I have my FreeBSD 9 tree located in /usr/src-9 which was refreshed via svn
yesterday.
The build is being executed on a host running FreeBSD 12.0-CURRENT #3 r308389 .
The steps that
Noticed in 2013 a problem with FreeBSD 9 due to a MFC which
broke my VPN. There's a bug report with a trivial patch at:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=179829
The problem is still present in FreeBSD 10 and the code in
HEAD also looks unchanged (meaning the problem l
- Original Message -
> From: "Dieter BSD"
> To: hack...@freebsd.org, curr...@freebsd.org
> Sent: Sunday, July 22, 2012 1:19:32 AM
> Subject: Re: Awful FreeBSD 9 block IO performance in KVM
>
> >>> da0: 3.300MB/s transfers
> >>> da0: Co
On 20 July 2012 15:26, Richard Yao wrote:
> I am in the process of setting up a VM instance specifically for this.
> While installing it, I noticed that qemu-kvm printed 'lsi_scsi: error:
> ORDERED queue not implemented', which might be a clue as to why the
> block device performance is bad.
>
>
On 07/20/2012 03:44 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On 19 July 2012 11:27, Richard Yao wrote:
>> Dear Everyone,
>>
>> FreeBSD 9 has awful block IO performance in KVM. I have experienced it
>> and others have experienced it. Someone posted slides to slideshare with
&
On 19 July 2012 11:27, Richard Yao wrote:
> Dear Everyone,
>
> FreeBSD 9 has awful block IO performance in KVM. I have experienced it
> and others have experienced it. Someone posted slides to slideshare with
> benchmarks documenting it:
>
> http://www.slideshare
and hardware in the lab on last week.
I reformatted the USB drive with extFAT and standard block size on
Windows 7. The USB drive is now seen again on FreeBSD and recognized as
this points that the pendrive's controller is not just flaky but horrid.
The communiation with OS, and how/whether it is
On Saturday 23 June 2012 11:52:53 Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On 21 June 2012 23:22, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> > usbconfig -d 7.6 add_quirk UQ_MSC_NO_INQUIRY
> >
> > Then re-plug it.
> >
> > I'm sorry to say a lot of USB flash sticks out there are broken and only
> > tested with the timing of MS Wi
On 06/23/12 10:39, Eduardo Morras wrote:
> At 09:21 23/06/2012, you wrote:
>> I tried the USB drive this morning with the recommended quirk shown
>> above on FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #1 r237462: Sat Jun 23 01:00:35 CEST 2012
>> without success. I get the same error message as shown above. With or
>> wi
On 21 June 2012 23:22, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> usbconfig -d 7.6 add_quirk UQ_MSC_NO_INQUIRY
>
> Then re-plug it.
>
> I'm sorry to say a lot of USB flash sticks out there are broken and only
> tested with the timing of MS Windows. Part of the problem is that it is
> difficult to autodetect th
At 09:21 23/06/2012, you wrote:
I tried the USB drive this morning with the recommended quirk shown
above on FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #1 r237462: Sat Jun 23 01:00:35 CEST 2012
without success. I get the same error message as shown above. With or
without quirk.
I then started Windows 7 on the same bo
On 06/22/12 08:22, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> On Friday 22 June 2012 08:01:38 O. Hartmann wrote:
>> I have a USB drive/stick, Lexar USB Flash drive as reported by FreeBSD
>> shown below.
>> When first used, I was able to put approx. 30 GB of data on it - it was
>> vis
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 1:01 AM, O. Hartmann
wrote:
> I have a USB drive/stick, Lexar USB Flash drive as reported by FreeBSD
> shown below.
> When first used, I was able to put approx. 30 GB of data on it - it was
> visible to FreeBSD 9 and 10 as expected.
> A Linux system at t
On 22.06.12 09:22, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
I'm sorry to say a lot of USB flash sticks out there are broken and
only tested with the timing of MS Windows. Part of the problem is that
it is difficult to autodetect these issues, because once you trigger
the non- supported SCSI command, then t
On Fri, 22 Jun 2012 08:22:19 +0200
Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
(snip)
> I would be more than glad to open up an office to certify USB devices for use
> with FreeBSD :-)
My elder colleague often told me that it is the easiest and well-working way
to check whether the one is certified to work for
incapable of handling the 64GB drive. I do not have issues with USB
it's not about capacity. But seems some quirks for that pendrive (which
have buggy firmware) has to be added, as it doesn't respond for inquiry
command.
sorry i am not USB expert.
umass1: on usbus7
(probe0:umass-sim1:1:0:
On Friday 22 June 2012 08:01:38 O. Hartmann wrote:
> I have a USB drive/stick, Lexar USB Flash drive as reported by FreeBSD
> shown below.
> When first used, I was able to put approx. 30 GB of data on it - it was
> visible to FreeBSD 9 and 10 as expected.
> A Linux system at t
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 11:01 PM, O. Hartmann
wrote:
> I have a USB drive/stick, Lexar USB Flash drive as reported by FreeBSD
> shown below.
> When first used, I was able to put approx. 30 GB of data on it - it was
> visible to FreeBSD 9 and 10 as expected.
> A Linux system at t
I have a USB drive/stick, Lexar USB Flash drive as reported by FreeBSD
shown below.
When first used, I was able to put approx. 30 GB of data on it - it was
visible to FreeBSD 9 and 10 as expected.
A Linux system at the lab was also capable of recognizing it. After
that, I tried to operate on the
On 23 March 2012 09:20, Alexander Pyhalov wrote:
> On 03/23/2012 01:52, Herbert J. Skuhra wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 22 Mar 2012 10:02:15 -0600
>> Efraín Déctor wrote:
>>
>>> Hello. I’m currently testing FreeBSD 9.0, I want to use it as a OS
>>> for a PostgreSQL Server. However, it is recommended to mo
On 03/23/2012 01:52, Herbert J. Skuhra wrote:
On Thu, 22 Mar 2012 10:02:15 -0600
Efraín Déctor wrote:
Hello. I’m currently testing FreeBSD 9.0, I want to use it as a OS
for a PostgreSQL Server. However, it is recommended to modified some
paramerts such as semaphores
(http://www.postgresql.org/
Thank you, I don't know why PostgreSQL still recommends to use it. But now I
can keep testing FreeBSD 9.
Thanks everyone.
-Mensaje original-
From: Herbert J. Skuhra
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2012 3:52 PM
To: Efraín Déctor
Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re:
On Thu, 22 Mar 2012 10:02:15 -0600
Efraín Déctor wrote:
> Hello. I’m currently testing FreeBSD 9.0, I want to use it as a OS
> for a PostgreSQL Server. However, it is recommended to modified some
> paramerts such as semaphores
> (http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/static/kernel-resources.html ):
-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: About kern.ipc.semmap on FreeBSD 9
Efraín Déctor wrote:
Hello. I’m currently testing FreeBSD 9.0, I want to use it as a OS for a
PostgreSQL Server. However, it is recommended to modified some paramerts
such as semaphores
(http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/static
Efraín Déctor wrote:
Hello. I’m currently testing FreeBSD 9.0, I want to use it as a OS for a
PostgreSQL Server. However, it is recommended to modified some paramerts such
as semaphores (http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/static/kernel-resources.html
):
kern.ipc.semmap=256
But when I tried t
Hello. I’m currently testing FreeBSD 9.0, I want to use it as a OS for a
PostgreSQL Server. However, it is recommended to modified some paramerts such
as semaphores (http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/static/kernel-resources.html
):
kern.ipc.semmap=256
But when I tried to change the value on F
Hi!
usb/165815
On 3/7/12, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Would you please submit this as a PR?
>
> That way it Doesn't get (as) lost.
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> adrian
>
> On 6 March 2012 16:53, Oliver Pinter wrote:
>> Hi all!
>>
>> I wrote a patch, to add support for Vodafone K3772-Z 3g modem.
>>
>> --
Hi!
Would you please submit this as a PR?
That way it Doesn't get (as) lost.
Thanks!
adrian
On 6 March 2012 16:53, Oliver Pinter wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> I wrote a patch, to add support for Vodafone K3772-Z 3g modem.
>
> --
> Oliver Pinter
> (Tresorium)
>
> __
Hi all!
I wrote a patch, to add support for Vodafone K3772-Z 3g modem.
--
Oliver Pinter
(Tresorium)
commit 092aa1246e1dde0ffe11a7bc06b540f4fa5851c9
Author: Oliver Pinter
Date: Wed Mar 7 01:47:51 2012 +0100
added support for Vodafone 3772-Z to u3g driver
ugen1.2: at usbus1
u
Hi,
I am seeing some uncommon problem while doing compilation of mps driver (this
is a latest driver from LSI).
Here are the steps I followed.
CASE-1
1. remove mps directory from sys/dev and sys/module and overwrite those two
directories with my latest code.
2. go to sys/module/mps and run "
; Kenneth D. Merry; McConnell, Stephen
> Subject: mps module compilation issue on FreeBSD-9 amd64
>
> Hi,
>
> I am seeing some uncommon problem while doing compilation of mps driver
> (this is a latest driver from LSI).
>
> Here are the steps I followed.
>
> CASE-1
>
&g
On 21 September 2011 05:46, Warren Block wrote:
> The patch in PR 160818 makes some clarifications and improvements to the new
> boot menu. Obviously this is not for 9.0-RELEASE, just wanting to get it
> out there so people can look at it.
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=160818
>
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Joel Dahl wrote:
> On 20-01-2012 7:57, Warren Block wrote:
>> On Tue, 20 Sep 2011, Warren Block wrote:
>>
>> > The patch in PR 160818 makes some clarifications and improvements to the
>> > new
>> > boot menu. Obviously this is not for 9.0-RELEASE, just wanting
On 20-01-2012 7:57, Warren Block wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Sep 2011, Warren Block wrote:
>
> > The patch in PR 160818 makes some clarifications and improvements to the
> > new
> > boot menu. Obviously this is not for 9.0-RELEASE, just wanting to get it
> > out
> > there so people can look at it.
>
On Tue, 20 Sep 2011, Warren Block wrote:
The patch in PR 160818 makes some clarifications and improvements to the new
boot menu. Obviously this is not for 9.0-RELEASE, just wanting to get it out
there so people can look at it.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=160818
Among other th
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 4:18 PM, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 04:11:22PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> on 13/01/2012 14:57 George Kontostanos said the following:
>> > Still the question remains regarding COMPAT_FREEBSD8 and how does this
>> > affects ports/misc/compat8x/
>>
>>
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 04:11:22PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 13/01/2012 14:57 George Kontostanos said the following:
> > Still the question remains regarding COMPAT_FREEBSD8 and how does this
> > affects ports/misc/compat8x/
>
> Looks like all the previous hints have not been clear enough.
>
on 13/01/2012 14:57 George Kontostanos said the following:
> Still the question remains regarding COMPAT_FREEBSD8 and how does this
> affects ports/misc/compat8x/
Looks like all the previous hints have not been clear enough.
There is no direct relation between COMPAT_FREEBSD8 and misc/compat8x.
CO
Kontostanos wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 8:42 PM, George Kontostanos
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Greetings all and my apologies for cross posting!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There s
on 13/01/2012 12:19 Doug Barton said the following:
> On 01/13/2012 02:06, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote:
>> Why can't it be that only shared libraries should be bumped, but no
>> kernel incompatible changes were introduced?
>
> Because one of the reasons we have major branches is so that we can
> chan
On 01/13/2012 02:06, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote:
> Why can't it be that only shared libraries should be bumped, but no
> kernel incompatible changes were introduced?
Because one of the reasons we have major branches is so that we can
change the various API/KPI/etc. in the newer branch.
Doug
--
George Kontostanos wrote:
Greetings all and my apologies for cross posting!
There seems to be a confusion regarding the ABI change in FreeBSD 9
and if this affects the usual upgrade path which includes a full port
rebuild.
The relevant post is here: http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t
Greetings all and my apologies for cross posting!
There seems to be a confusion regarding the ABI change in FreeBSD 9
and if this affects the usual upgrade path which includes a full port
rebuild.
The relevant post is here: http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=28831
Frankly, I am also
On Tue, 6 Dec 2011, Sean Bruno wrote:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/geom-mirror.html
Not in the Handbook. To make gmirror work with GPT, create GPT
partitions and mirror those. I wrote an article on that using multiple
partitions: http://www.wonkity.com/~wblock/docs/html/gmirror.html
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/geom-mirror.html
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On Fri, 2 Dec 2011 16:22:10 +1100
Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
> On Friday, 2 December 2011 at 1:50:19 +0100, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> > On Thu, 1 Dec 2011 21:31:18 +0200
> > George Kontostanos wrote:
> >>
> >> Does this mean that loading ahci in loader.conf is useless ?
> >
> > No, I load mine f
On Thu, 1 Dec 2011 21:31:18 +0200
George Kontostanos wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> From my understanding as of 20110424 revision device ahci has been
> integrated into kernel:
>
>
> It is possible to load devices ahci, ata, siis and mvs as modules, but
> option ATA_CAM should remai
Hi everyone,
>From my understanding as of 20110424 revision device ahci has been
integrated into kernel:
It is possible to load devices ahci, ata, siis and mvs as modules, but
option ATA_CAM should remain in kernel configuration to make ata
module work as CAM driver supporting le
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 7:40 AM, O. Hartmann
wrote:
> Since a while, vlc on my FreeBSD 10 and FreeBSD 9 boxes do not show a
> graphical interface anymore. Compiling multimedia/vlc works, either with
> the legacy gcc or clang. But either way I compile vlc, the result is
> always the
Since a while, vlc on my FreeBSD 10 and FreeBSD 9 boxes do not show a
graphical interface anymore. Compiling multimedia/vlc works, either with
the legacy gcc or clang. But either way I compile vlc, the result is
always the same: no GUI. Instead, I receive the below show message:
VLC media player
Thank you! I see this fix in 9 STABLE.
Works)
2011/11/8 John Baldwin :
> On Tuesday, November 08, 2011 2:10:51 pm Pavel Timofeev wrote:
>> FreeBSD accessor 9.0-RC2 FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 #0: Tue Nov 8 20:52:11 MSK
>> 2011 mox@accessor:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
>> RC2 is coming. Nothing cha
On Tuesday, November 08, 2011 2:10:51 pm Pavel Timofeev wrote:
> FreeBSD accessor 9.0-RC2 FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 #0: Tue Nov 8 20:52:11 MSK
> 2011 mox@accessor:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
> RC2 is coming. Nothing changed.
Sorry, haven't been able to merge them to 9 yet.
> 2011/10/25 John Ba
FreeBSD accessor 9.0-RC2 FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 #0: Tue Nov 8 20:52:11 MSK
2011 mox@accessor:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
RC2 is coming. Nothing changed.
2011/10/25 John Baldwin :
> On Monday, October 24, 2011 7:21:27 pm Gunnar Schaefer wrote:
>> On Oct 24, 2011, at 2:40 PM, Dennis Koegel wro
Not sure if anyone else is having problem with proftpd on freebsd 9,
but here is a patch to stop it terminating, should be included in next
release, courtesy of TJ saunders working with me on it.
Dan.
--
Dan The Man
CTO/ Senior System Administrator
Websites, Domains and Everything else
On Sunday 30 October 2011 01:31:21 Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> I'm not sure what would load it automatically - it may be built into the
> kernel though. Anyway, as you say it should work with ulpt loaded anyway.
Hi,
ulpt is autoloaded by /etc/devd/usb.conf
--HPS
Le 30.10.2011 08:28, David Marec a écrit :
>> I have a similar problem..
Le 30.10.2011 08:28, David Marec a écrit :
>> I have a similar problem..
A new behavior occurs since I updated the world & kernel this morning.
`devd` now executes the entry for hplip, as I defined it inside
/usr/local/e
Le 30.10.2011 10:04, Jakub Lach a écrit :
Or "just" extend hplip section in handbook.
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/printing-lpd-alternatives.html
It should be a good idea, I agree.
Especially in this case, where nobody now knows how and where HPLIP
rights have to be settled.
It co
Or "just" extend hplip section in handbook.
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/printing-lpd-alternatives.html
It could be roughly based upon this:
http://freebsd.kde.org/howtos/hplip.php
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Freebsd-9-amd64-USB-HP
It would be nice, If somebody would write updated
manual documenting whole process of setting up hplip.
In past, I could only get it to the point of printing
test pages (sigh...)
Before release preferably?
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Freebsd-9-amd64
Le 29.10.2011 21:58, Jilles Tjoelker a écrit :
> On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 04:10:46PM +0200, David Marec wrote:
>> So, what's should be the news group&user's rights required by HPLIP/cups
>> on FreeBSD 9 ?
>
>> And, how to handle them with devd ?
>
>
Le 30.10.2011 01:31, Daniel O'Connor a écrit :
On 30/10/2011, at 24:40, David Marec wrote:
But, now running FreeBSD 9, I get new usb/devd behavior issues.
First, the ulpt module is always loaded. Is there any elegant way to get rid of
this 'self loading' behavior, except to
On 30/10/2011, at 24:40, David Marec wrote:
> But, now running FreeBSD 9, I get new usb/devd behavior issues.
>
> First, the ulpt module is always loaded. Is there any elegant way to get rid
> of this 'self loading' behavior, except to remove it from /boot/modules ?
&g
Le Sat, 29 Oct 2011 21:58:53 +0200,
Jilles Tjoelker a écrit :
> On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 04:10:46PM +0200, David Marec wrote:
> > So, what's should be the news group&user's rights required by
> > HPLIP/cups on FreeBSD 9 ?
>
> > And, how to handle
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 04:10:46PM +0200, David Marec wrote:
> So, what's should be the news group&user's rights required by HPLIP/cups
> on FreeBSD 9 ?
> And, how to handle them with devd ?
Use devfs rules.
Pasting from http://www.stack.nl/~jilles/unix/freebsd-devfs.t
detected on " $1
dev=`echo $1 | /usr/bin/awk 'BEGIN { } { s = substr($0, 5, 99); } END {
print s; }'`
#
echo "setting suitable rights for " $dev
/usr/sbin/chown cups:hplip /dev/usb/$dev.[0-9]
/bin/chmod g+rw /dev/usb/$dev.[0-9]
But, now running FreeBSD 9, I get new usb/devd
On Monday, October 24, 2011 7:21:27 pm Gunnar Schaefer wrote:
> On Oct 24, 2011, at 2:40 PM, Dennis Koegel wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 11:33:23AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> >> Perhaps try http://www.freebsd.org/~jhb/patches/edd_params.patch
> >
> > GCC chokes here in drv.c:{49,50}: "ca
on 24/10/2011 21:23 John Baldwin said the following:
> On Monday, October 24, 2011 12:25:09 pm Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> Also, perhaps edd_params_v3 and edd_params_v4 should inherit edd_params in
>> some
>> "smarter" way to avoid verbatim duplicates.
>
> Yeah, probably so. We will probably never ev
2011/10/24 Dimitry Andric
> On 2011-10-23 21:56, Dennis Koegel wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 08:57:59PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>>
>>> I found a document that suggests a possibility of BIOS writing more bytes
>>> to the
>>> array than its current size of 0x42: [...]
>>> Could you please
23.10.2011 11:12, Eugene Dzhurinsky wrote:
In the mentime, can you please advice how can I use camcontrol in order to
disable APM for my HDD?
@reboot camcontrol idle ada0 -t 300 ; camcontrol idle ada1 -t 300
--
Sphinx of black quartz judge my vow.
__
On Oct 24, 2011, at 2:40 PM, Dennis Koegel wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 11:33:23AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
>> Perhaps try http://www.freebsd.org/~jhb/patches/edd_params.patch
>
> GCC chokes here in drv.c:{49,50}: "cannot convert to a pointer type":
>
>v86.ds = VTOPSEG(params);
>
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 11:33:23AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> Perhaps try http://www.freebsd.org/~jhb/patches/edd_params.patch
GCC chokes here in drv.c:{49,50}: "cannot convert to a pointer type":
v86.ds = VTOPSEG(params);
v86.esi = VTOPOFF(params);
Changed this to ¶ms. Also ch
On Monday, October 24, 2011 12:25:09 pm Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 24/10/2011 18:33 John Baldwin said the following:
> > On Monday, October 24, 2011 9:47:42 am Andriy Gapon wrote:
> >> on 24/10/2011 16:41 John Baldwin said the following:
> >>> On Sunday, October 23, 2011 1:57:59 pm Andriy Gapon wrote
on 24/10/2011 18:33 John Baldwin said the following:
> On Monday, October 24, 2011 9:47:42 am Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> on 24/10/2011 16:41 John Baldwin said the following:
>>> On Sunday, October 23, 2011 1:57:59 pm Andriy Gapon wrote:
[snip]
I found a document that suggests a possibility of BIOS
On Monday, October 24, 2011 9:47:42 am Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 24/10/2011 16:41 John Baldwin said the following:
> > On Sunday, October 23, 2011 1:57:59 pm Andriy Gapon wrote:
> >> on 23/10/2011 18:27 Dennis Koegel said the following:
> >>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 04:33:38PM -0400, John Baldwin wr
on 24/10/2011 16:41 John Baldwin said the following:
> On Sunday, October 23, 2011 1:57:59 pm Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> on 23/10/2011 18:27 Dennis Koegel said the following:
>>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 04:33:38PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
Working offline with Dennis, we found that changing the C
On Sunday, October 23, 2011 1:57:59 pm Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 23/10/2011 18:27 Dennis Koegel said the following:
> > On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 04:33:38PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> >> Working offline with Dennis, we found that changing the CFLAGS in
> >> sys/boot/i386/gptboot/Makefile from "-O1"
:28:08AM +0400, Pavel Timofeev wrote:
> >>>> I used FreeBSD 9 amd64 on my HP Proliant DL360 G5 (smart array p400i
> >> mirror)
> >>>> as test. [...]
> >>>> It was fresh install and I choose guided partitioning (GPT)
> >>>> But a
On 2011-10-23 21:56, Dennis Koegel wrote:
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 08:57:59PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
I found a document that suggests a possibility of BIOS writing more bytes to the
array than its current size of 0x42: [...]
Could you please test this hypothesis by trying the following patch?
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 08:57:59PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> I found a document that suggests a possibility of BIOS writing more bytes to
> the
> array than its current size of 0x42: [...]
> Could you please test this hypothesis by trying the following patch?
With -O1 and this patch, it boots.
on 23/10/2011 18:27 Dennis Koegel said the following:
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 04:33:38PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
>> Working offline with Dennis, we found that changing the CFLAGS in
>> sys/boot/i386/gptboot/Makefile from "-O1" to "-Os -mrtd" (partially
>> reverting
>> an earlier commit) fix
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 04:33:38PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> Working offline with Dennis, we found that changing the CFLAGS in
> sys/boot/i386/gptboot/Makefile from "-O1" to "-Os -mrtd" (partially reverting
> an earlier commit) fixed gptboot. The next test for someone to do would be
> to
>
on 22/10/2011 01:22 Gunnar Schaefer said the following:
> On Oct 21, 2011, at 2:37 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> A litmus question: do those experiencing the trouble all have BTX_SERIAL
>> defined?
>
> Not sure where BTX_SERIAL would be defined, but I'm seeing the problem with
> the generic kernel.
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 09:59:45PM +0100, Bruce Cran wrote:
> On 22/10/2011 16:21, Eugene Dzhurinsky wrote:
> >> ataidle -P 0 /dev/ada0
> > ataidle: error opening /dev/ada0
>
> Thanks for reporting the breakage, I'll see if I can get it fixed in
> time for 9.0.
Wow, it would be great! :)
In the
On 22/10/2011 16:21, Eugene Dzhurinsky wrote:
ataidle -P 0 /dev/ada0
ataidle: error opening /dev/ada0
Thanks for reporting the breakage, I'll see if I can get it fixed in
time for 9.0.
--
Bruce Cran
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
htt
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 02:23:53PM +0100, Bruce Cran wrote:
> Why do you not want to use ataidle?
> ataidle -P 0 /dev/ada0
ataidle: error opening /dev/ada0
> ataidle -P 0 /dev/ad4
ataidle: error: identify device /dev/ad4
> ls -l /dev | grep ad
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel4 Oct 22 18:1
Why do you not want to use ataidle?
--
Bruce Cran
(ataidle maintainer)
On 22 Oct 2011, at 11:36, Eugene Dzhurinsky wrote:
> Hello, can somebody please advice how to disable APM power management for HDD
> on laptops?
>
>> camcontrol cmd ada0 -a "EF 05 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00" -v
> camcon
Hello, can somebody please advice how to disable APM power management for HDD
on laptops?
> camcontrol cmd ada0 -a "EF 05 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00" -v
camcontrol: error sending command
(pass0:ahcich0:0:0:0): SETFEATURES. ACB: ef 05 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
(pass0:ahcich0:0:0:0): CAM stat
AM +0400, Pavel Timofeev wrote:
>>>>> I used FreeBSD 9 amd64 on my HP Proliant DL360 G5 (smart array p400i
>>> mirror)
>>>>> as test. [...]
>>>>> It was fresh install and I choose guided partitioning (GPT)
>>>>> But after reboot my serv
on 22/10/2011 00:27 Andriy Gapon said the following:
> on 21/10/2011 23:33 John Baldwin said the following:
>> On Friday, October 21, 2011 4:58:51 am Dennis Koegel wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 11:28:08AM +0400, Pavel Timofeev wrote:
>>>> I used FreeBSD 9 am
on 21/10/2011 23:33 John Baldwin said the following:
> On Friday, October 21, 2011 4:58:51 am Dennis Koegel wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 11:28:08AM +0400, Pavel Timofeev wrote:
>>> I used FreeBSD 9 amd64 on my HP Proliant DL360 G5 (smart array p400i
> mirror)
>>
On Friday, October 21, 2011 4:58:51 am Dennis Koegel wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 11:28:08AM +0400, Pavel Timofeev wrote:
> > I used FreeBSD 9 amd64 on my HP Proliant DL360 G5 (smart array p400i
mirror)
> > as test. [...]
> > It was fresh install and I choose guided parti
On Oct 21, 2011, at 1:58 AM, Dennis Koegel wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 11:28:08AM +0400, Pavel Timofeev wrote:
>> I used FreeBSD 9 amd64 on my HP Proliant DL360 G5 (smart array p400i mirror)
>> as test. [...]
>> It was fresh install and I choose guided partitioning (GPT
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 10:58:51AM +0200, Dennis Koegel wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 11:28:08AM +0400, Pavel Timofeev wrote:
> > I used FreeBSD 9 amd64 on my HP Proliant DL360 G5 (smart array p400i mirror)
> > as test. [...]
> > It was fresh install and I choose gui
2011/10/21 Dennis Koegel
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 11:28:08AM +0400, Pavel Timofeev wrote:
> > I used FreeBSD 9 amd64 on my HP Proliant DL360 G5 (smart array p400i
> mirror)
> > as test. [...]
> > It was fresh install and I choose guided partitioning (GPT)
> > Bu
2011/10/21 Dennis Koegel
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 11:28:08AM +0400, Pavel Timofeev wrote:
> > I used FreeBSD 9 amd64 on my HP Proliant DL360 G5 (smart array p400i
> mirror)
> > as test. [...]
> > It was fresh install and I choose guided partitioning (GPT)
> > Bu
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 11:28:08AM +0400, Pavel Timofeev wrote:
> I used FreeBSD 9 amd64 on my HP Proliant DL360 G5 (smart array p400i mirror)
> as test. [...]
> It was fresh install and I choose guided partitioning (GPT)
> But after reboot my server don't boot from hd.
We have
I used FreeBSD 9 amd64 on my HP Proliant DL360 G5 (smart array p400i mirror)
as test.
It was installed long time ago and often I did csup/rebuild.
Yesterday I updated it to 9.0-RC1 and everything was fine.
Today I downloaded BETA3 iso and tried to install it.
bsdinstall is good. CD ISO boots and
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 8:56 PM, matt wrote:
> /usr/src/sys/dev/acpi_support/acpi_asus.c
>
> Might be a good place to start?
>
> You can use 'acpidump -dt > acpidump.aml' to get a dump of the laptop's
> acpi in the file acpidump.aml...This may allow you to determine what
> changed, either in the a
On Sun, 2 Oct 2011 15:49:44 +0400
arrowdodger <6year...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 5:44 PM, arrowdodger <6year...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Lars Engels
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 05:30:25PM +0400, arrowdodger wrote:
> >> > Hello.
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 5:44 PM, arrowdodger <6year...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Lars Engels wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 05:30:25PM +0400, arrowdodger wrote:
>> > Hello. I've used FreeBSD 8-STABLE on my Asus K40IN notebook. This
>> notebook
>> > has an key combi
1 - 100 of 196 matches
Mail list logo
