On Sat, 20 Nov 1999, J Wunsch wrote:
> Matthew Jacob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Too many people have objected. I didn't make my case clearly enough,
> > but because enough people of have raised issues, the default won't
> > be changed.
>
> Too bad. I think your idea was absoultely righ
Matthew Jacob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Too many people have objected. I didn't make my case clearly enough,
> but because enough people of have raised issues, the default won't
> be changed.
Too bad. I think your idea was absoultely right, and i'm rather tired
myself to have to `fix' it for
> On Tuesday, 16 November 1999 at 8:04:05 -0800, Matthew Jacob wrote:
> >
> > Too many people have objected. I didn't make my case clearly enough,
> > but because enough people of have raised issues, the default won't
> > be changed.
>
> I think this is the correct decision in the short term. I
On Tue, 16 Nov 1999, Greg Lehey wrote:
> On Tuesday, 16 November 1999 at 8:04:05 -0800, Matthew Jacob wrote:
> >
> > Too many people have objected. I didn't make my case clearly enough,
> > but because enough people of have raised issues, the default won't
> > be changed.
>
> I think this is th
On Tuesday, 16 November 1999 at 8:04:05 -0800, Matthew Jacob wrote:
>
> Too many people have objected. I didn't make my case clearly enough,
> but because enough people of have raised issues, the default won't
> be changed.
I think this is the correct decision in the short term. In the longer
t
Too many people have objected. I didn't make my case clearly enough, but
because enough people of have raised issues, the default won't be changed.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message