> It seems feasable to generate a new binary on a recent or an old patched
> FreeBSD version. The question is which is better. I think the newer
> the better. Otherwise, who is going to build the 2.2.8-stable box
> to make this one binary? I've already built a binary on 4.2-release
> that work
[Noted that you don't like being cc:'d, David. On the other hand,
I like to be kept in the cc: list.]
On Tuesday, 26th December 2000, "David O'Brien" wrote:
>On Wed, Dec 27, 2000 at 02:01:24AM +1000, Stephen McKay wrote:
>> I'll try to summarise the position so far:
>>
>> 1) Legacy a.out execu
On Wed, Dec 27, 2000 at 02:01:24AM +1000, Stephen McKay wrote:
> I'll try to summarise the position so far:
>
> 1) Legacy a.out executable support is broken for a subset (size unknown)
> of such executables.
Define "legacy". I have been speaking specifically about FreeBSD 2.2
support. That jus
I'll try to summarise the position so far:
1) Legacy a.out executable support is broken for a subset (size unknown)
of such executables.
2) We can ignore this or repair this.
3) We can build a new binary or just look around on old 3.x CDs until
we find one that works.
4) We can generate a work
