On Mon, 12 Mar 2001 18:46:16 -0500
James FitzGibbon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Both of the patches below fix the problem mentioned in PR bin/25110. The
> first one fixes it inside of kern_fork.c and would appear to apply the
> corrective behaviour regardless of whether the process uses libc_r
Both of the patches below fix the problem mentioned in PR bin/25110. The
first one fixes it inside of kern_fork.c and would appear to apply the
corrective behaviour regardless of whether the process uses libc_r or not.
The second patch fixes the problem inside of uthread_fork.c. Whether the
fir
