Re: FORTRAN vs. Fortran (was: November 5th is Clang-Day)

2012-11-03 Thread Peter Jeremy
On 2012-Nov-02 11:21:10 -0500, Brooks Davis wrote: >On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 10:21:19AM +, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: >> It's a shame though that, with LLVM as the >> default compiler, further development of >> FreeBSD/ia64 and FreeBSD/sparc64 >> will probably suffer and then stop altogether. >

Re: FORTRAN vs. Fortran (was: November 5th is Clang-Day)

2012-11-02 Thread Brooks Davis
On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 10:21:19AM +, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2012 17:08:18 +1100 > From: "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" > To: Erich Dollansky > Subject: FORTRAN vs. Fortran (was: November 5th is Clang-Day) > >

Re: FORTRAN vs. Fortran (was: November 5th is Clang-Day)

2012-11-02 Thread Steve Kargl
On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 07:27:44AM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: > > caNyO usti llputw hitespa cewhere ever you like in for TraN? > Sigh. You can get copies of the final committee drafts of the Fortran 95, 2003, and 2008 standards. There you will learn that Fortran since Fortran 90 al

Re: FORTRAN vs. Fortran (was: November 5th is Clang-Day)

2012-11-02 Thread Steve Kargl
On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 08:25:58AM +, David Chisnall wrote: > On 2 Nov 2012, at 08:18, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote: > > > Very many years ago , when 2010 was a very distant future , I do not > > remember the name of the writer , who wrote approximately : > > > > "In 2010 , there will be Fortr

Re: FORTRAN vs. Fortran (was: November 5th is Clang-Day)

2012-11-02 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
On 11/02/2012 05:21 AM, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2012 17:08:18 +1100 From: "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" To: Erich Dollansky Subject: FORTRAN vs. Fortran (was: November 5th is Clang-Day) On Friday, 2 November 2012 at 1

Re: FORTRAN vs. Fortran (was: November 5th is Clang-Day)

2012-11-02 Thread Anton Shterenlikht
From thera...@theravensnest.org Fri Nov 2 10:54:08 2012 On 2 Nov 2012, at 10:21, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > further development of > FreeBSD/ia64 and FreeBSD/sparc64 > will probably suffer and then stop altogether There is a SPARC64 back end for L

Re: FORTRAN vs. Fortran (was: November 5th is Clang-Day)

2012-11-02 Thread Anton Shterenlikht
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2012 17:08:18 +1100 From: "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" To: Erich Dollansky Subject: FORTRAN vs. Fortran (was: November 5th is Clang-Day) On Friday, 2 November 2012 at 12:21:03 +0700, Erich Dollansky wrote: > Hi,

Re: FORTRAN vs. Fortran (was: November 5th is Clang-Day)

2012-11-02 Thread David Chisnall
On 2 Nov 2012, at 08:18, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote: > Very many years ago , when 2010 was a very distant future , I do not > remember the name of the writer , who wrote approximately : > > "In 2010 , there will be Fortran , but a Fortran which may be different ." I remember a talk in the mid '