> At 2:57 PM -0500 2000/3/24, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
>
> > At 10:01 AM -0800 3/24/00, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> >> This is not a 'normal Matt patch' that 'just works'. Ok, it seems to
> >> just work, but it's not a normal Matt patch. If there were a
> >> designation before 'early a
At 2:57 PM -0500 2000/3/24, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
> At 10:01 AM -0800 3/24/00, Matthew Dillon wrote:
>> This is not a 'normal Matt patch' that 'just works'. Ok, it seems to
>> just work, but it's not a normal Matt patch. If there were a
>> designation before 'early alpha' this p
At 10:01 AM -0800 3/24/00, Matthew Dillon wrote:
>This is not a 'normal Matt patch' that 'just works'. Ok, it seems to
>just work, but it's not a normal Matt patch. If there were a
>designation before 'early alpha' this patch would get it.
"Rough-draft proposal for early alpha versi
Umm... ok, some people seem to be enthusiastic but I really recommend
that ONLY experts mess around with this patch until they sign off on
its properness (or suggest fixes for improperness).
This is not a 'normal Matt patch' that 'just works'. Ok, it seems to
just work, but i
