Ian West wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jan 09, 2000 at 06:16:30AM -0500, Donn Miller wrote:
> > Everything seems to be working great for the ESS 1868 now, but I was
> > just wondering...
> >
>
> While it is much better than it was (sound happens, and the machine
> doesn't reboot :-), I am still seeing a r
On Sun, Jan 09, 2000 at 06:16:30AM -0500, Donn Miller wrote:
> It looks like the ESS 1868 is working OK now with the DSP_BUFFSIZE set
> to 8192. Before, it wouldn't work unless I set this value to (65536 -
> 256), which was the original value, I believe. So, why does the ESS
> work OK now with a
It looks like the ESS 1868 is working OK now with the DSP_BUFFSIZE set
to 8192. Before, it wouldn't work unless I set this value to (65536 -
256), which was the original value, I believe. So, why does the ESS
work OK now with a buffer size of 8192? And how is this buffersize an
advantage over (
