On Sun, 19 Oct 2014, Matthew Grooms wrote:
Thanks for that. I hope the Xen devs can get the yajl and signed int patches
committed. Those were the only C level code changes I ran into and would
clean up the build significantly for clang users. Tho only other knit was the
...
register unsig
On 10/19/2014 3:03 PM, Marcin Cieslak wrote:
On Sun, 19 Oct 2014, Matthew Grooms wrote:
[...]
I have recently managed to compile Xen (4.5 unstable from git master) using
few patches in the source code (I posted them to xen-devel@, most of them
are almost the same as some earlier work by Juli
On 10/19/2014 2:27 PM, Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 19 Oct 2014, at 18:34, Matthew Grooms wrote:
As most of you are probably aware, Roger at Citrix R&D has been doing some
incredible work to bring PVH domU/dom0 support to FreeBSD. There has also been an
effort by other Xen developers to get the s
On Sun, 19 Oct 2014, Matthew Grooms wrote:
All,
As most of you are probably aware, Roger at Citrix R&D has been doing some
incredible work to bring PVH domU/dom0 support to FreeBSD. There has also
been an effort by other Xen developers to get the software to compile using
clang. While most
On 19 Oct 2014, at 18:34, Matthew Grooms wrote:
> As most of you are probably aware, Roger at Citrix R&D has been doing some
> incredible work to bring PVH domU/dom0 support to FreeBSD. There has also
> been an effort by other Xen developers to get the software to compile using
> clang. While m
All,
As most of you are probably aware, Roger at Citrix R&D has been doing
some incredible work to bring PVH domU/dom0 support to FreeBSD. There
has also been an effort by other Xen developers to get the software to
compile using clang. While most of these attempts appear to be on Linux
platf
