Re: CMD640 and ATA drivers

2000-03-14 Thread Thomas Veldhouse
On Tue, 14 Mar 2000, Soren Schmidt wrote: > It worked until the latest newbus changes, I'm looking at it, but havn't > found anything obvious yet. > But seriously you want to get another ATA interface, the CMD640 is > _broken_ and no software can help that, you are playing russian > roulette wi

Re: CMD640 and ATA drivers

2000-03-14 Thread Jim Bloom
And I have three machines which I was trying to use for testing -current and my firewall. These machines all have either a CMD640 or an RZ100 controller on the motherboard. (They seemed to be popular with the early Pentium machines.) The controllers seem reliable enough to use for extended perio

Re: CMD640 and ATA drivers

2000-03-14 Thread Soren Schmidt
It seems Thomas Veldhouse wrote: > Are there any plans to support the buggy CMD640 interface in the future > now that 4.0-RELEASE has come and gone? I have a box that is running 3.4 > happily, and it has this interface. I really would like the chance to use > some of the 4.0 features, but I can

Re: CMD640 and ATA drivers

2000-03-14 Thread Kelly Yancey
On Tue, 14 Mar 2000, Thomas Veldhouse wrote: > Are there any plans to support the buggy CMD640 interface in the future > now that 4.0-RELEASE has come and gone? I have a box that is running 3.4 > happily, and it has this interface. I really would like the chance to use > some of the 4.0 feature

CMD640 and ATA drivers

2000-03-14 Thread Thomas Veldhouse
Are there any plans to support the buggy CMD640 interface in the future now that 4.0-RELEASE has come and gone? I have a box that is running 3.4 happily, and it has this interface. I really would like the chance to use some of the 4.0 features, but I can not while support for this interface lack