On 2010-May-31 17:57:32 -0500, Brooks Davis wrote:
>http://wiki.freebsd.org/201005ToolchainSummitSummary
>
>This includes a rough draft of a roadmap. We need to convert this into
>a roadmap page with each required feature listed along with status and
>contacts.
Thank you for that. The approach
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 11:23:32AM -0500, Brooks Davis wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 11:15:26AM +0200, Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav wrote:
> > Brooks Davis writes:
> > > http://wiki.freebsd.org/201005ToolchainSummitSummary
> >
> > "No new functionality that requires clang/llvm."
> >
> > How about "No
On Tue, 1 Jun 2010, Brooks Davis wrote:
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 11:15:26AM +0200, Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav wrote:
Brooks Davis writes:
http://wiki.freebsd.org/201005ToolchainSummitSummary
"No new functionality that requires clang/llvm."
How about "No new functionality with non-trivial incompa
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 11:15:26AM +0200, Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav wrote:
> Brooks Davis writes:
> > http://wiki.freebsd.org/201005ToolchainSummitSummary
>
> "No new functionality that requires clang/llvm."
>
> How about "No new functionality with non-trivial incompatibilities with
> clang/llvm"?
T
Brooks Davis writes:
> http://wiki.freebsd.org/201005ToolchainSummitSummary
"No new functionality that requires clang/llvm."
How about "No new functionality with non-trivial incompatibilities with
clang/llvm"?
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - d...@des.no
___
Before the developers summit at BSDCan a small group of developers and
industry partners held a summit on toolchain issues. The agenda along
with a number of slide sets appears on the wiki at:
http://wiki.freebsd.org/201005ToolchainSummit
The primary focus of the summit was our increasingly ob
