Vallo Kallaste wrote:
> Strange, I always thought the -current list is for general issues
> related to -current branch and for true kernel hackers exist -hackers.
Ok, now you know differently. No problem. :)
--
"Welcome to the desert of the real."
- Laurence Fishburne as Morpheu
On Tue, 14 Mar 2000, Vallo Kallaste wrote:
> Strange, I always thought the -current list is for general issues
> related to -current branch ...
We really should have a new mailing list since we have an additional branch.
I'll again voice the opinion that the naming of the lists is sub-optimal.
On Tue, Mar 14, 2000 at 01:31:39PM -0800, David O'Brien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It's current thing also, no?
>
> Not in the least. Specialized mailing lists exist to take the
> specialized traffic off the more general lists.
>
> Plus, the fix to your problem is to fix the port. The Po
On Tue, Mar 14, 2000 at 06:26:37PM +0200, Vallo Kallaste wrote:
> > This belongs in [EMAIL PROTECTED] *NOT* the freebsd-current list!!!
> Yes, I did bounce the mail to freebsd-ports as well.
> It's current thing also, no?
Not in the least. Specialized mailing lists exist to take the
speciali
On Tue, Mar 14, 2000 at 08:19:24AM -0800, David O'Brien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2000 at 01:30:32PM +0200, Vallo Kallaste wrote:
> > Just did switchover to 5.0-current and noticed that building jpeg shared
>
> This belongs in [EMAIL PROTECTED] *NOT* the freebsd-current list!
On Tue, Mar 14, 2000 at 01:30:32PM +0200, Vallo Kallaste wrote:
> Just did switchover to 5.0-current and noticed that building jpeg shared
This belongs in [EMAIL PROTECTED] *NOT* the freebsd-current list!!!
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in th
Hello
Just did switchover to 5.0-current and noticed that building jpeg shared
library doesn't work. Lots of X apps depend on jpeg shared library. The
fix is very small, just edit patch-ac to include freebsd5* as well.
Just FYI.
--
Vallo Kallaste
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to
