Re: 4.0 CODE FREEZE WILL BEGIN IN FIVE (5) DAYS

2000-01-25 Thread Soren Schmidt
It seems Greg Childers wrote: > Hope this helps! It may be helping you, but everyone having more than the ATA chip on the motherboard is going to be bitten severely by this as the interrupt for the primary channel on all controllers are now hardwired to irq 14. What does the Detected irq: say on

Re: 4.0 CODE FREEZE WILL BEGIN IN FIVE (5) DAYS

2000-01-25 Thread Greg Childers
At 08:19 AM 1/25/00 +0100, Soren Schmidt wrote: > > On some older PCI systems, including my Pentium 66, the driver still detects > > irq 0 for ata-pci0. Hardwiring it to irq 14 in the source as suggested recently >is the >temporary fix I'm using. > >Could you send that patch around me please ?

Re: 4.0 CODE FREEZE WILL BEGIN IN FIVE (5) DAYS

2000-01-24 Thread Soren Schmidt
It seems Greg Childers wrote: > > >Huh, you have only told me about the missing CDROM (should be fixed > >with the commit I just did), what else seems to be a problem ?? > > On some older PCI systems, including my Pentium 66, the driver still detects > irq 0 for ata-pci0. Hardwiring it to irq 1

Re: at driver problems (was: 4.0 CODE FREEZE WILL BEGIN IN FIVE (5) DAYS)

2000-01-24 Thread Soren Schmidt
It seems TrouBle wrote: > does it look like this ??? Could I have a complete dmesg, or at least all the lines that belongs to the ata driver ?? I need to know what chips etc to be able to diagnose further... > ad0: 9770MB (20010816 sectors), 19852 cyls, 16 heads, 63 S/T, 512 B/S > ad0: 16 secs/i

Re: at driver problems (was: 4.0 CODE FREEZE WILL BEGIN IN FIVE (5) DAYS)

2000-01-24 Thread TrouBle
does it look like this ??? ad0: ATA-5 disk at ata0 as master ad0: 9770MB (20010816 sectors), 19852 cyls, 16 heads, 63 S/T, 512 B/S ad0: 16 secs/int, 1 depth queue, UDMA33 acd0: CDROM drive at ata0 as slave acd0: read 6890KB/s (6890KB/s), 256KB buffer, PIO4 acd0: Reads: CD-R, CD-RW, CD-DA stream

at driver problems (was: 4.0 CODE FREEZE WILL BEGIN IN FIVE (5) DAYS)

2000-01-24 Thread Greg Lehey
On Monday, 24 January 2000 at 13:33:43 -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Mon, 24 Jan 2000, Soren Schmidt wrote: > >> Huh, you have only told me about the missing CDROM (should be fixed >> with the commit I just did), what else seems to be a problem ?? > > My WDC drive falling back to PIO mode..see

Re: 4.0 CODE FREEZE WILL BEGIN IN FIVE (5) DAYS

2000-01-24 Thread Greg Childers
>Huh, you have only told me about the missing CDROM (should be fixed >with the commit I just did), what else seems to be a problem ?? On some older PCI systems, including my Pentium 66, the driver still detects irq 0 for ata-pci0. Hardwiring it to irq 14 in the source as suggested recently is t

Re: 4.0 CODE FREEZE WILL BEGIN IN FIVE (5) DAYS

2000-01-24 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Mon, 24 Jan 2000, Soren Schmidt wrote: > Huh, you have only told me about the missing CDROM (should be fixed > with the commit I just did), what else seems to be a problem ?? My WDC drive falling back to PIO mode..see the dmesg in the previous message. Kris "How many roads must a man w

Re: 4.0 CODE FREEZE WILL BEGIN IN FIVE (5) DAYS

2000-01-24 Thread Soren Schmidt
It seems Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Mon, 24 Jan 2000, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > > > On the 29th of January, I'll be freezing the -current branch (well, > > OK, the trunk). That means NO commits without my review first and I > > Hmm. What does this mean for the ATA driver? I know Soren has some

Re: 4.0 CODE FREEZE WILL BEGIN IN FIVE (5) DAYS

2000-01-24 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Mon, 24 Jan 2000, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > On the 29th of January, I'll be freezing the -current branch (well, > OK, the trunk). That means NO commits without my review first and I Hmm. What does this mean for the ATA driver? I know Soren has some more updates in the wings, and I'm gratefu