Re: -CURRENT + cvs = panic

2003-03-03 Thread Mikko Työläjärvi
On Tue, 4 Mar 2003, Vladimir Kushnir wrote: > On Mon, 3 Mar 2003, Philipp Mergenthaler wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 01:23:20AM +0200, Vladimir Kushnir wrote: > > > Practically 100% repeatable: after some CVS updates (not sure but it > > > seems after another high HD load as well) -CURRENT

Re: -CURRENT + cvs = panic

2003-03-03 Thread Vladimir Kushnir
On Mon, 3 Mar 2003, Philipp Mergenthaler wrote: > On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 01:23:20AM +0200, Vladimir Kushnir wrote: > > Practically 100% repeatable: after some CVS updates (not sure but it > > seems after another high HD load as well) -CURRENT panics with > > bwrite: buffer is not busy > > (in the

Re: -CURRENT + cvs = panic

2003-03-03 Thread leafy
On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 11:01:22AM +0100, Philipp Mergenthaler wrote: > In that gdb trace, I think the panic was only an aftereffect and > the trouble started here: > #15 0xc02bc1c8 in calltrap () at {standard input}:96 > #16 0xc021fd79 in tcp_input (m=0xc0d49c30, off0=20) > at /usr/src/sys/ne

Re: -CURRENT + cvs = panic

2003-03-03 Thread Philipp Mergenthaler
On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 01:23:20AM +0200, Vladimir Kushnir wrote: > Practically 100% repeatable: after some CVS updates (not sure but it > seems after another high HD load as well) -CURRENT panics with > bwrite: buffer is not busy > (in the prefious message I've attached gdb trace and so on, and no

-CURRENT + cvs = panic

2003-03-02 Thread Vladimir Kushnir
Practically 100% repeatable: after some CVS updates (not sure but it seems after another high HD load as well) -CURRENT panics with bwrite: buffer is not busy (in the prefious message I've attached gdb trace and so on, and nothing has changed so far). It goes on for at least several days now. Rega