On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 02:31:45PM +0400, Sergey Kandaurov wrote:
S> On 13 March 2014 20:43, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
S> > Hi!
S> >
S> > Since initial mail
S> >
S> >
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2013-October/045911.html
S> >
S> > did not raise a lot of objection, I'm going
On 13 March 2014 20:43, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Since initial mail
>
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2013-October/045911.html
>
> did not raise a lot of objection, I'm going to proceed with this.
Would you like to clean up from DECnet as well? :)
sys/net/if_fddi
Hi,
On 13 Mar 2014, at 16:43, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Since initial mail
>
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2013-October/045911.html
>
> did not raise a lot of objection, I'm going to proceed with this.
>
> --
> Totus tuus, Glebius.
In which case, somebody nee
On Thu, 13 Mar 2014, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
Since initial mail
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2013-October/045911.html
did not raise a lot of objection, I'm going to proceed with this.
Ditto here -- on the one hand, a shame, and on the other, reality. Remember
to also gar
On 13 Mar 2014, at 09:43, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Since initial mail
>
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2013-October/045911.html
>
> did not raise a lot of objection, I'm going to proceed with this.
OK by me.
--
Rui Paulo
_
Hi!
Since initial mail
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2013-October/045911.html
did not raise a lot of objection, I'm going to proceed with this.
--
Totus tuus, Glebius.
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lis
On 10/29/13, 3:23 AM, Ian Lepore wrote:
On Mon, 2013-10-28 at 19:54 +0100, Stefan Bethke wrote:
Am 28.10.2013 um 13:42 schrieb Gleb Smirnoff :
The plan is two axe two old networking protocols from FreeBSD head/,
meaning that FreeBSD 11.0-RELEASE, available in couple of years would
be shipped
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 12:12:21PM -0700, Tom Samplonius wrote:
>
> On Oct 28, 2013, at 11:54 AM, Stefan Bethke wrote:
>
> > Am 28.10.2013 um 13:42 schrieb Gleb Smirnoff :
> >
> >> The plan is two axe two old networking protocols from FreeBSD head/,
> >> meaning that FreeBSD 11.0-RELEASE, avail
On Oct 28, 2013, at 11:54 AM, Stefan Bethke wrote:
> Am 28.10.2013 um 13:42 schrieb Gleb Smirnoff :
>
>> The plan is two axe two old networking protocols from FreeBSD head/,
>> meaning that FreeBSD 11.0-RELEASE, available in couple of years would
>> be shipped without them.
>>
>> 1) AppleTalk
Hi, all,
Am 28.10.2013 um 17:49 schrieb dro...@rpi.edu:
> I notice that CAP was removed from the ports collection some time ago,
> and that there didn't seem to be any objections to that. So that's
> some more indication that appletalk isn't seeing much use.
I’d guess the main reason is that App
On Mon, 2013-10-28 at 19:54 +0100, Stefan Bethke wrote:
> Am 28.10.2013 um 13:42 schrieb Gleb Smirnoff :
>
> > The plan is two axe two old networking protocols from FreeBSD head/,
> > meaning that FreeBSD 11.0-RELEASE, available in couple of years would
> > be shipped without them.
> >
> > 1) Ap
Am 28.10.2013 um 13:42 schrieb Gleb Smirnoff :
> The plan is two axe two old networking protocols from FreeBSD head/,
> meaning that FreeBSD 11.0-RELEASE, available in couple of years would
> be shipped without them.
>
> 1) AppleTalk
>
> Last time claimed to be supported by vendor in 2007[1].
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 12:49:14PM -0400, dro...@rpi.edu wrote:
d> As far as the kernel-level support, I assume you're just removing all
d> the code tied to the kernel options NETATALK and NETATALKDEBUG? Or does
d> it entail some other changes, which might wreck my custom compile of CAP?
Yes, tha
On Mon, 28 Oct 2013 11:28:07 EDT Julian Elischer wrote:
>
> On 10/28/13 8:42 PM, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> >
> >The plan is two axe two old networking protocols from FreeBSD head/,
> > meaning that FreeBSD 11.0-RELEASE (available in couple of years) would
> > be shipped without them.
> >
> > 1) A
On 10/28/13 8:42 PM, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
Hello!
[Cc to stable@, for wider audience]
The plan is two axe two old networking protocols from FreeBSD head/,
meaning that FreeBSD 11.0-RELEASE, available in couple of years would
be shipped without them.
1) AppleTalk
Last time claimed
On 10/28/13 07:42, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> Hello!
>
> [Cc to stable@, for wider audience]
>
> The plan is two axe two old networking protocols from FreeBSD head/,
> meaning that FreeBSD 11.0-RELEASE, available in couple of years would
> be shipped without them.
>
> 1) AppleTalk
>
>Last tim
Hi,
On 28 Oct 2013, at 12:42, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> Hello!
>
> [Cc to stable@, for wider audience]
>
> The plan is two axe two old networking protocols from FreeBSD head/,
> meaning that FreeBSD 11.0-RELEASE, available in couple of years would
> be shipped without them.
>
> 1) AppleTalk
>
Hello!
[Cc to stable@, for wider audience]
The plan is two axe two old networking protocols from FreeBSD head/,
meaning that FreeBSD 11.0-RELEASE, available in couple of years would
be shipped without them.
1) AppleTalk
Last time claimed to be supported by vendor in 2007[1]. In practic
18 matches
Mail list logo
