On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 02:28:54AM +, Alexander Best wrote:
> On Mon Feb 28 11, Roman Divacky wrote:
> > hi there,
> >
> > I have a patch that shrinks boot2 some:
> >
> > 1) it switches kname to be just a pointer instead of an array
> >thus avoiding a couple of memcpy()s
> >
> > 2) it ch
On Mon Feb 28 11, Roman Divacky wrote:
> hi there,
>
> I have a patch that shrinks boot2 some:
>
> 1) it switches kname to be just a pointer instead of an array
>thus avoiding a couple of memcpy()s
>
> 2) it changes ioctl to unsigned from uint8_t
>
> 3) it changes the first keyhit limit to
On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 07:54:14AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Monday, February 28, 2011 3:39:28 pm Roman Divacky wrote:
> > 3) it changes the first keyhit limit to 5 seconds from 3
> >so that constant propagation can take place
>
> Does this make booting take 2 seconds longer as a result?
On Monday, February 28, 2011 3:39:28 pm Roman Divacky wrote:
> 3) it changes the first keyhit limit to 5 seconds from 3
>so that constant propagation can take place
Does this make booting take 2 seconds longer as a result?
I'm curious as to why '3*FOO' isn't a constant but '5*FOO' is?
I thin
hi there,
I have a patch that shrinks boot2 some:
1) it switches kname to be just a pointer instead of an array
thus avoiding a couple of memcpy()s
2) it changes ioctl to unsigned from uint8_t
3) it changes the first keyhit limit to 5 seconds from 3
so that constant propagation can take p
