Re: [Retitled!] some under-VM detections for non-amd64 may be broken

2025-02-20 Thread Olivier Certner
Hi, I've submitted a change proposal to fix this (and potentially other problems): https://reviews.freebsd.org/D49084 Please feel free to comment/review there. For olivier@: I'd be interested in seeing the full output of (minus serial numbers of course): kenv | grep -F smbios in all the cases yo

Re: [Retitled!] some under-VM detections for non-amd64 may be broken

2025-02-19 Thread Mark Millard
On Feb 19, 2025, at 09:42, Olivier Cochard-Labbé wrote: > On Wed, Feb 19, 2025 at 6:05 PM Mark Millard wrote: >> >> Another example might be if new VM contexts should be added, >> such as UTM for macOS. What do kenv smbios.system.product , >> sysctl kern.vm_guest , and sysctl kern.hz report for

Re: [Retitled!] some under-VM detections for non-amd64 may be broken

2025-02-19 Thread Olivier Cochard-Labbé
On Wed, Feb 19, 2025 at 6:05 PM Mark Millard wrote: > > Another example might be if new VM contexts should be added, > such as UTM for macOS. What do kenv smbios.system.product , > sysctl kern.vm_guest , and sysctl kern.hz report for UTM on: > > ) amd64 macOS > ) aarch64 macOS > ) . . . ? > Hi,

[Retitled!] some under-VM detections for non-amd64 may be broken

2025-02-19 Thread Mark Millard
On Feb 19, 2025, at 05:24, Jason Bacon wrote: > > On 2/18/25 20:13, Mark Millard wrote: >> Something I possibly should have done --but did not do was to set: >> kern.hz=100 > > I stopped doing this under VirtualBox a few years ago, because it was causing > clock skew. Apparently an assumption