Re: [RFC] removing broken includes

2011-02-08 Thread Roman Divacky
I see it crashes very early on ;) can you report: Assertion failed: (isValid()), function getSpellingLoc, file SourceLocation.cpp, line 84. this stuff to the developers? the tool looks pretty useful On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 11:58:27AM +, Alexander Best wrote: > On Fri Feb 4 11, Garrett Coop

Re: [RFC] removing broken includes

2011-02-08 Thread Alexander Best
On Fri Feb 4 11, Garrett Cooper wrote: > On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 10:53 PM, Roman Divacky wrote: > > alex, > > > > I think you are the kind of person to try out > > > > http://code.google.com/p/include-what-you-use/ > > > > with fbsd :) > > Please be careful with this tool though. There's head

Re: [RFC] removing broken includes

2011-02-06 Thread Alexander Best
On Sat Feb 5 11, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > On Fri, 4 Feb 2011 20:19:48 +, Alexander Best wrote: > >On Fri Feb 4 11, John Baldwin wrote: > >>On Thursday, February 03, 2011 5:12:57 pm Alexander Best wrote: > >>> hi everybody, > >>> i've started to check the source for broken includes, such as

Re: [RFC] removing broken includes

2011-02-05 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On Fri, 4 Feb 2011 20:19:48 +, Alexander Best wrote: >On Fri Feb 4 11, John Baldwin wrote: >>On Thursday, February 03, 2011 5:12:57 pm Alexander Best wrote: >>> hi everybody, >>> i've started to check the source for broken includes, such as the one fixed >>> in >>> r218189. so far i've run t

Re: [RFC] removing broken includes

2011-02-05 Thread Alexander Best
On Fri Feb 4 11, John Baldwin wrote: > On Thursday, February 03, 2011 5:12:57 pm Alexander Best wrote: > > hi everybody, > > > > i've started to check the source for broken includes, such as the one fixed > > in > > r218189. so far i've run through arch=amd64 and found only two broken > > inclu

Re: [RFC] removing broken includes

2011-02-05 Thread Alexander Best
On Sat Feb 5 11, Roman Divacky wrote: > alex, > > I think you are the kind of person to try out > > http://code.google.com/p/include-what-you-use/ thanks. this is the first time i hear of this project. i'll try to get it up and running. > > with fbsd :) > > On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 10:12:57P

Re: [RFC] removing broken includes

2011-02-04 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 10:53 PM, Roman Divacky wrote: > alex, > > I think you are the kind of person to try out > > http://code.google.com/p/include-what-you-use/ > > with fbsd :) Please be careful with this tool though. There's header pollution in them thar c files (refer to the FreeBSD and/

Re: [RFC] removing broken includes

2011-02-04 Thread Roman Divacky
alex, I think you are the kind of person to try out http://code.google.com/p/include-what-you-use/ with fbsd :) On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 10:12:57PM +, Alexander Best wrote: > hi everybody, > > i've started to check the source for broken includes, such as the one fixed in > r218189. so far

Re: [RFC] removing broken includes

2011-02-04 Thread Alexander Best
On Fri Feb 4 11, John Baldwin wrote: > On Thursday, February 03, 2011 5:12:57 pm Alexander Best wrote: > > hi everybody, > > > > i've started to check the source for broken includes, such as the one fixed > > in > > r218189. so far i've run through arch=amd64 and found only two broken > > inclu

Re: [RFC] removing broken includes

2011-02-04 Thread Alexander Best
On Fri Feb 4 11, John Baldwin wrote: > On Thursday, February 03, 2011 5:12:57 pm Alexander Best wrote: > > hi everybody, > > > > i've started to check the source for broken includes, such as the one fixed > > in > > r218189. so far i've run through arch=amd64 and found only two broken > > inclu

Re: [RFC] removing broken includes

2011-02-04 Thread John Baldwin
On Thursday, February 03, 2011 5:12:57 pm Alexander Best wrote: > hi everybody, > > i've started to check the source for broken includes, such as the one fixed in > r218189. so far i've run through arch=amd64 and found only two broken > includes, > which should be fixed by the attached patch. the

Re: [RFC] removing broken includes

2011-02-04 Thread Alexander Best
On Thu Feb 3 11, Alexander Best wrote: > hi everybody, > > i've started to check the source for broken includes, such as the one fixed in > r218189. so far i've run through arch=amd64 and found only two broken > includes, > which should be fixed by the attached patch. the commands i'm using are:

[RFC] removing broken includes

2011-02-03 Thread Alexander Best
hi everybody, i've started to check the source for broken includes, such as the one fixed in r218189. so far i've run through arch=amd64 and found only two broken includes, which should be fixed by the attached patch. the commands i'm using are: for target=buildkernel: make SRCCONF=/dev/null __MA