On 06.02.2017 16:27, peter.b...@bsd4all.org wrote:
Andrey,
Is this going to MFC'ed to stable-11 in the future? I have tested
with current and found no issues, but I would like to add it to a
semi-production environment running stable-11
Hi,
I thought to make MFC after a month or two, but I d
Andrey,
Is this going to MFC'ed to stable-11 in the future? I have tested with current
and found no issues, but I would like to add it to a semi-production
environment running stable-11
Peter
> On 6 Feb 2017, at 10:07, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
>
> On 11.12.2016 02:07, Andrey V. Elsukov wrot
On 11.12.2016 02:07, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
I am pleased to announce that projects/ipsec, that I started several
months ago is ready for testing and review.
The main goals were:
* rework locking to make IPsec code more friendly for concurrent
processing;
* make lookup in SADB/SPDB faste
11.12.2016 01:07, Andrey V. Elsukov пишет:
Hi All,
I am pleased to announce that projects/ipsec, that I started several
months ago is ready for testing and review.
The main goals were:
* rework locking to make IPsec code more friendly for concurrent
processing;
* make lookup in SADB/S
Hi All,
I ported the changes from projects/ipsec to stable/11 branch.
So, if it is more suitable for testing, please, welcome.
You can checkout the sources from github:
https://github.com/bu7cher/freebsd/tree/stable/11
Also I made the standalone patch:
https://people.freebsd.org
On 09.01.2017 14:38, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On 27 Dec 2016, at 10:18, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
So, if there will no objection, I'll merge projects/ipsec into head/
within two weeks.
I still keep seeing almost daily changes to the branch and am having a
hard time to convince myself to do a prop
On 27 Dec 2016, at 10:18, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
So, if there will no objection, I'll merge projects/ipsec into head/
within two weeks.
I still keep seeing almost daily changes to the branch and am having a
hard time to convince myself to do a proper review that way. I would
very much pre
On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 6:10 AM, Andrey V. Elsukov
wrote:
> On 27.12.2016 16:15, Jim Thompson wrote:
>
>> In it's initial state if_ipsec allows to use only one set of
>>> encryption parameters (because only one sainfo anonyumous is
>>> possible), so at this time it doesn't allow to create multipl
On 27.12.2016 16:15, Jim Thompson wrote:
In it's initial state if_ipsec allows to use only one set of
encryption parameters (because only one sainfo anonyumous is
possible), so at this time it doesn't allow to create multiple
tunnels with VPN hubs that use different cipers and/or transform
sets,
> In it's initial state if_ipsec allows to use only one set of encryption
> parameters (because only one sainfo anonyumous is possible), so at this time
> it doesn't allow to create multiple tunnels with VPN hubs that use different
> cipers and/or transform sets, but as far as I understand this
On 11.12.2016 02:07, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
Hi All,
I am pleased to announce that projects/ipsec, that I started several
months ago is ready for testing and review.
The main goals were:
* rework locking to make IPsec code more friendly for concurrent
processing;
* make lookup in SADB/S
Hi,
On 11.12.2016 4:07, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
Hi All,
I am pleased to announce that projects/ipsec, that I started several
months ago is ready for testing and review.
The main goals were:
* rework locking to make IPsec code more friendly for concurrent
processing;
* make lookup in
On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 12:07 AM, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am pleased to announce that projects/ipsec, that I started several
> months ago is ready for testing and review.
> The main goals were:
> * rework locking to make IPsec code more friendly for concurrent
> processing;
Hi All,
I am pleased to announce that projects/ipsec, that I started several
months ago is ready for testing and review.
The main goals were:
* rework locking to make IPsec code more friendly for concurrent
processing;
* make lookup in SADB/SPDB faster;
* revise PFKEY implementation, rem
14 matches
Mail list logo
