Re: [Patch] mdmfs currently broken

2003-09-05 Thread Bruce Evans
On Fri, 5 Sep 2003, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bruce Evans writes: > > >> We should not revert to putting BSD labels on everything. > >> > >Disk labels are required by the not unused fsck_ffs utility to search > >for alternate superblocks. > > You mean: > > The wide

Re: [Patch] mdmfs currently broken

2003-09-05 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bruce Evans writes: >> We should not revert to putting BSD labels on everything. >> >Disk labels are required by the not unused fsck_ffs utility to search >for alternate superblocks. You mean: The widely used fsck_ffs utility is able to use information from the op

Re: [Patch] mdmfs currently broken

2003-09-05 Thread Bruce Evans
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Stefan =?iso-8859- > 1?Q?E=DFer?= writes: > >Seems that mdmfs stopped working recently (probably because > >of GEOM related changes). One possible fix is to label the > >md and newfs the thusly created c partition. > >

Re: [Patch] mdmfs currently broken

2003-09-04 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Stefan =?iso-8859- 1?Q?E=DFer?= writes: >Seems that mdmfs stopped working recently (probably because >of GEOM related changes). One possible fix is to label the >md and newfs the thusly created c partition. > >This requires running /sbin/disklabel, which didn't have

[Patch] mdmfs currently broken

2003-09-04 Thread Stefan Eßer
Seems that mdmfs stopped working recently (probably because of GEOM related changes). One possible fix is to label the md and newfs the thusly created c partition. This requires running /sbin/disklabel, which didn't have an entry in paths.h. Any objections against me committing the follwoing fixe