On 04.08.2003 01:04, Mike Makonnen wrote:
On Sun, Aug 03, 2003 at 04:11:12PM +0200, Jens Rehsack wrote:
the patch works for me very well. I've checked what's been done
and had only small recommendations:
- Wouldn't it be better to configure the devfs rules by
/etc/devfs.conf or is it impossible?
On Sun, Aug 03, 2003 at 04:11:12PM +0200, Jens Rehsack wrote:
>
> the patch works for me very well. I've checked what's been done
> and had only small recommendations:
>
> - Wouldn't it be better to configure the devfs rules by
> /etc/devfs.conf or is it impossible?
>
> - Even it would be a go
On 03.08.2003 16:11, Jens Rehsack wrote:
On 02.08.2003 01:29, Mike Makonnen wrote:
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 08:27:07PM +0200, Jens Rehsack wrote:
On 29.07.2003 19:21, Mike Makonnen wrote:
>On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 07:08:38PM +0200, Jens Rehsack wrote:
>Yeah, I'll take care of this. I had asked sc
On 02.08.2003 01:29, Mike Makonnen wrote:
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 08:27:07PM +0200, Jens Rehsack wrote:
On 29.07.2003 19:21, Mike Makonnen wrote:
>On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 07:08:38PM +0200, Jens Rehsack wrote:
>Yeah, I'll take care of this. I had asked scott to mail me his final
>patch so I could
On 02.08.2003 01:29, Mike Makonnen wrote:
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 08:27:07PM +0200, Jens Rehsack wrote:
On 29.07.2003 19:21, Mike Makonnen wrote:
>On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 07:08:38PM +0200, Jens Rehsack wrote:
>Yeah, I'll take care of this. I had asked scott to mail me his final
>patch so I could c
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 08:27:07PM +0200, Jens Rehsack wrote:
> On 29.07.2003 19:21, Mike Makonnen wrote:
>
> >On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 07:08:38PM +0200, Jens Rehsack wrote:
> >Yeah, I'll take care of this. I had asked scott to mail me his final
> >patch so I could commit it, but I never heard back
On 29.07.2003 19:21, Mike Makonnen wrote:
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 07:08:38PM +0200, Jens Rehsack wrote:
Yeah, I'll take care of this. I had asked scott to mail me his final
patch so I could commit it, but I never heard back from him. I'll
dig out the revisions from my mail archives and combine the
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 07:08:38PM +0200, Jens Rehsack wrote:
> On 29.07.2003 18:47, Robert Watson wrote:
>
>
> >Someone, and unfortunately I appear to have lost track of who, had some
> >tweaks to the rcNG scripts to set up some reasonable devfs rules for a
> >jail, and apply them to the devfs m
On 29.07.2003 18:47, Robert Watson wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Jens Rehsack wrote:
I updated the rcng jail start script to mount devfs and procfs into the
jail if wanted. Adding entries to /etc/fstab didn't work properly,
because the jail filesystem wasn't mounted when the startup process
wants t
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Jens Rehsack wrote:
> I updated the rcng jail start script to mount devfs and procfs into the
> jail if wanted. Adding entries to /etc/fstab didn't work properly,
> because the jail filesystem wasn't mounted when the startup process
> wants to mount it.
>
> Going this way a
Hi all, hi Clement,
I updated the rcng jail start script to mount devfs and procfs
into the jail if wanted. Adding entries to /etc/fstab didn't
work properly, because the jail filesystem wasn't mounted when
the startup process wants to mount it.
Going this way allows us to control which jail could
11 matches
Mail list logo
