Re: [HEADSUP] geli(4) weak master key generation on -CURRENT

2012-08-25 Thread Fabian Keil
"Simon L. B. Nielsen" wrote: > On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 1:05 PM, Ulrich Spörlein wrote: > > On Mon, 2012-08-20 at 22:24:56 +0100, Simon L. B. Nielsen wrote: > >> -CURRENT users of geli(4) should be advised that, a geli(4) device may > >> have weak master key, if the provider is created on -CURRE

Re: [HEADSUP] geli(4) weak master key generation on -CURRENT

2012-08-24 Thread Simon L. B. Nielsen
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 1:05 PM, Ulrich Spörlein wrote: > On Mon, 2012-08-20 at 22:24:56 +0100, Simon L. B. Nielsen wrote: >> Hello, >> >> If you are not using geli(4) on -CURRENT (AKA FreeBSD 10) you can safely >> ignore this mail. If you are, please read on! >> >> -CURRENT users of geli(4) shoul

Re: [HEADSUP] geli(4) weak master key generation on -CURRENT

2012-08-21 Thread Ulrich Spörlein
On Mon, 2012-08-20 at 22:24:56 +0100, Simon L. B. Nielsen wrote: > Hello, > > If you are not using geli(4) on -CURRENT (AKA FreeBSD 10) you can safely > ignore this mail. If you are, please read on! > > -CURRENT users of geli(4) should be advised that, a geli(4) device may > have weak master key,

[HEADSUP] geli(4) weak master key generation on -CURRENT

2012-08-20 Thread Simon L. B. Nielsen
Hello, If you are not using geli(4) on -CURRENT (AKA FreeBSD 10) you can safely ignore this mail. If you are, please read on! -CURRENT users of geli(4) should be advised that, a geli(4) device may have weak master key, if the provider is created on -CURRENT system built against source code betwee