Re: [HEADSUP] ZFS version 15 committed to head

2010-07-18 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On Sat, 17 Jul 2010 12:51:34 +0200 Marco van Lienen wrote: > On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 12:25:56PM +0200, you (Stefan Bethke) sent > the following to the -current list: > > Am 17.07.2010 um 12:14 schrieb Marco van Lienen: > > > > > # zpool list pool1 > > > NAMESIZE USED AVAILCAP HEALTH

Re: [HEADSUP] ZFS version 15 committed to head

2010-07-17 Thread Freddie Cash
On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 11:21 AM, Marco van Lienen wrote: > On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 10:12:10AM -0700, you (Freddie Cash) sent the > following to the -current list: >> > >> > I have read many things about those differences, but why then does zfs on >> > opensolaris report more available space whe

Re: [HEADSUP] ZFS version 15 committed to head

2010-07-17 Thread Marco van Lienen
On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 10:12:10AM -0700, you (Freddie Cash) sent the following to the -current list: > > > > I have read many things about those differences, but why then does zfs on > > opensolaris report more available space whereas FreeBSD does not? > > That would imply that my friend running

Re: [HEADSUP] ZFS version 15 committed to head

2010-07-17 Thread Freddie Cash
On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 3:51 AM, Marco van Lienen wrote: > On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 12:25:56PM +0200, you (Stefan Bethke) sent the > following to the -current list: >> Am 17.07.2010 um 12:14 schrieb Marco van Lienen: >> >> > # zpool list pool1 >> > NAME    SIZE   USED  AVAIL    CAP  HEALTH  ALTROO

Re: [HEADSUP] ZFS version 15 committed to head

2010-07-17 Thread Marco van Lienen
On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 12:25:56PM +0200, you (Stefan Bethke) sent the following to the -current list: > Am 17.07.2010 um 12:14 schrieb Marco van Lienen: > > > # zpool list pool1 > > NAMESIZE USED AVAILCAP HEALTH ALTROOT > > pool1 5.44T 147K 5.44T 0% ONLINE - > ... > > zfs

Re: [HEADSUP] ZFS version 15 committed to head

2010-07-17 Thread Stefan Bethke
Am 17.07.2010 um 12:14 schrieb Marco van Lienen: > # zpool list pool1 > NAMESIZE USED AVAILCAP HEALTH ALTROOT > pool1 5.44T 147K 5.44T 0% ONLINE - ... > zfs list however only shows: > # zfs list pool1 > NAMEUSED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT > pool1 91.9K 3.56T 28.0K /po

Re: [HEADSUP] ZFS version 15 committed to head

2010-07-17 Thread Marco van Lienen
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 04:02:42PM +0200, you (Martin Matuska) sent the following to the -current list: > Dear community, > > Feel free to test everything and don't forget to report any bugs found. When I create a raidz pool of 3 equally sized hdd's (3x2Tb WD caviar green drives) the reported

Re: [HEADSUP] ZFS version 15 committed to head

2010-07-14 Thread Attila Nagy
Hi, On 07/13/2010 04:02 PM, Martin Matuska wrote: For people interested in running this on 8.1 I will provide patches for releng/8.1 and stable/8 as soon as 8.1 gets released. Previously, I've run earlier versions (8) with sys/cddl taken from head. Is this a no-go with what we have currently i

[HEADSUP] ZFS version 15 committed to head

2010-07-13 Thread Martin Matuska
Dear community, as you may have noticed, ZFS v15 support with many bugfixes was committed to head in revision 209962. The commit was tagged for MFC, so if there are no stopper issues I am going to commit it to stable/8 in 2 months from today. Here is a short summary of what we gained with this u