On Fri, Feb 04, 2000 at 11:05:01AM +, Josef Karthauser wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 04, 2000 at 11:40:34AM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> >
> > > Might I advice some more time before we actually do something?
> > >
> > > What's all this rush-it-in before anyone can actually fix the larger
> > > prob
Josef Karthauser wrote:
> The reason for adopting a fall back solution it that it is not clear that
> setflags/getflags is the best choice of function name for manipulating
> file flags as it's a bit too generic a name. Whilst we're debating
> this point there's no point in having them as librar
On Fri, Feb 04, 2000 at 11:40:34AM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
>
> > Might I advice some more time before we actually do something?
> >
> > What's all this rush-it-in before anyone can actually fix the larger
> > problem?
> >
> I'm positive about this as well.
>
The main reason for the backou
