On 26 mar 2015, at 22:00, Jakob Alvermark wrote:
> On Tue, March 24, 2015 00:29, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> Without the attached kernel patch(es), Xorg starts consuming alot of CPU
>> and becomes very unresponsive and unusable.
>>
>> Using ktrace reveals that X-org is issuing D
On 03/26/15 22:37, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Is there a PR filed with this?
No, do you want me to make one?
--HPS
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "fre
On 03/26/15 22:37, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Is there a PR filed with this?
There is now:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198936
--HPS
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-curre
Is there a PR filed with this?
-a
On 26 March 2015 at 14:00, Jakob Alvermark wrote:
> On Tue, March 24, 2015 00:29, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> Without the attached kernel patch(es), Xorg starts consuming alot of CPU
>> and becomes very unresponsive and unusable.
>>
>> Using ktr
On Tue, March 24, 2015 00:29, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> Without the attached kernel patch(es), Xorg starts consuming alot of CPU
> and becomes very unresponsive and unusable.
>
> Using ktrace reveals that X-org is issuing DRM_IOCTL_MODE_GETCONNECTOR
> over and over again with no appare
Hi,
Without the attached kernel patch(es), Xorg starts consuming alot of CPU
and becomes very unresponsive and unusable.
Using ktrace reveals that X-org is issuing DRM_IOCTL_MODE_GETCONNECTOR
over and over again with no apparent reason. It doesn't happen when
using a simple window manager li
> Just as a data point, 'stray timeout' happens in clean -current without
> new patch as well. So whatever that is, it is not caused by the patch.
>
> --
> Alexander Kabaev
>
I can confirm this, however, when it happens is RARE... it seems like it
happens when I am typing in the address bar of ch
On Tue, 03 Mar 2015 23:33:23 +0100
Jean-S'ebastien P'edron wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Here is a new patch to based on HEAD r279508:
> https://people.freebsd.org/~dumbbell/graphics/drm-update-38.i.patch
>
> You can apply it to a Subversion checkout using the following command:
> svn patch drm-upda
On Tue, 03 Mar 2015 23:33:23 +0100 Jean-Sébastien Pédron
wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> Here is a new patch to based on HEAD r279508:
> https://people.freebsd.org/~dumbbell/graphics/drm-update-38.i.patch
>
> You can apply it to a Subversion checkout using the following command:
> svn patch drm-upda
On 03/03/15 23:33, Jean-Sébastien Pédron wrote:
Hi!
Here is a new patch to based on HEAD r279508:
https://people.freebsd.org/~dumbbell/graphics/drm-update-38.i.patch
You can apply it to a Subversion checkout using the following command:
svn patch drm-update-38.i.patch
There are few c
Hi!
Here is a new patch to based on HEAD r279508:
https://people.freebsd.org/~dumbbell/graphics/drm-update-38.i.patch
You can apply it to a Subversion checkout using the following command:
svn patch drm-update-38.i.patch
There are few changes:
o The panic reported by J.R. Oldroyd is
On 02/25/15 13:12, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
The -h patch Works for me, tested on a mac book pro.
--HPS
On another box the -h patch causes infinite HDMI hotplug events to be
sent, causing alot of xorg CPU usage.
This dmesg is w/o the -h patch.
info: [drm] Initialized drm 1.1.0 20060810
dr
On 02/17/15 18:45, Jean-Sébastien Pédron wrote:
> Hi!
>
> An update to the DRM subsystem, not including the drivers, is ready for
> wider testing!
>
> The patch against HEAD is here:
> https://people.freebsd.org/~dumbbell/graphics/drm-update-38.f.patch
>
> I'm interested in success/failure repor
The -h patch Works for me, tested on a mac book pro.
--HPS
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Thanks for your work :)I apply the h version of the patch on r279140 and it
failed on some hunk (Same result as J.R Oldroyd)I will try to apply the patch
manually and give you the resultsMy chip is Intel Corei7 4th gen (Haswell)
K
G+ : https://plus.google.com/u/0/+AlexandreKeledjian/posts
Twitter
On Fri, 20 Feb 2015 15:49:44 +0100 Anders Bolt-Evensen
wrote:
>>
> I saw that you had updated your patchfile to drm-update-38.h.patch, and
> ...
> applied the patch, it seemed to be more successful, but on 22 occations
> the patch still fails (the following list contains all the fails; the
>
On 18/02/15 00:45, Jean-Sébastien Pédron wrote:
Hi!
An update to the DRM subsystem, not including the drivers, is ready for
wider testing!
The patch against HEAD is here:
https://people.freebsd.org/~dumbbell/graphics/drm-update-38.f.patch
I'm interested in success/failure reports for amd64, p
> On 18 Feb 2015, at 20:45, Shawn Webb wrote:
>
>> On Wednesday, February 18, 2015 12:45:36 AM Jean-Sébastien Pédron wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> An update to the DRM subsystem, not including the drivers, is ready for
>> wider testing!
>>
>> The patch against HEAD is here:
>> https://people.freebsd.org
Dear Jean,
thanks for your work!
I built a recent git checkout of the kms38-branch on both a i5-3320M
(w/ HD4000) and an AMD FirePro V4900. Works absolutely fine, the only
minor issue is that there seemingly is a small performance regression
w/ clover. However, I didn't yet have time to dig into
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 12:45:36AM +0100, Jean-Sébastien Pédron wrote:
> Hi!
>
> An update to the DRM subsystem, not including the drivers, is ready for
> wider testing!
>
> The patch against HEAD is here:
> https://people.freebsd.org/~dumbbell/graphics/drm-update-38.f.patch
>
Have you looked i
On Wednesday, February 18, 2015 12:45:36 AM Jean-Sébastien Pédron wrote:
> Hi!
>
> An update to the DRM subsystem, not including the drivers, is ready for
> wider testing!
>
> The patch against HEAD is here:
> https://people.freebsd.org/~dumbbell/graphics/drm-update-38.f.patch
>
> I'm interested
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 12:09 AM, Lundberg, Johannes <
johan...@brilliantservice.co.jp> wrote:
> Hi
>
> Good job! Will do some testing! As for the i915 driver, what versions are
> supported? Up until and including HD4000 Gen7 Ivy bridge?
>
> --
> Johannes Lundberg
> BRILLIANTSERVICE CO., LTD.
>
2015-02-18 0:45 GMT+01:00 Jean-Sébastien Pédron :
> Hi!
>
> An update to the DRM subsystem, not including the drivers, is ready for
> wider testing!
>
> The patch against HEAD is here:
> https://people.freebsd.org/~dumbbell/graphics/drm-update-38.f.patch
>
> I'm interested in success/failure repor
I just checked out head and applied the patch and all except the last hunk
applied successfully.
My sys/modules/drm2/radeonkms/Makefile looks like this at the end and
therefor fails:
#radeon_prime.c
#--radeon_trace_points.c
SRCS+=
On 18-2-2015 1:09, Lundberg, Johannes wrote:
Hi
Good job! Will do some testing! As for the i915 driver, what versions are
supported? Up until and including HD4000 Gen7 Ivy bridge?
Correct.
--
Johannes Lundberg
BRILLIANTSERVICE CO., LTD.
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 8:45 AM, Jean-Sébastien Pédro
On 18-2-2015 1:21, Shawn Webb wrote:
On Wednesday, February 18, 2015 12:45:36 AM Jean-Sébastien Pédron wrote:
Hi!
An update to the DRM subsystem, not including the drivers, is ready for
wider testing!
The patch against HEAD is here:
https://people.freebsd.org/~dumbbell/graphics/drm-update-38.
On Wednesday, February 18, 2015 12:45:36 AM Jean-Sébastien Pédron wrote:
> Hi!
>
> An update to the DRM subsystem, not including the drivers, is ready for
> wider testing!
>
> The patch against HEAD is here:
> https://people.freebsd.org/~dumbbell/graphics/drm-update-38.f.patch
>
> I'm interested
Hi
Good job! Will do some testing! As for the i915 driver, what versions are
supported? Up until and including HD4000 Gen7 Ivy bridge?
--
Johannes Lundberg
BRILLIANTSERVICE CO., LTD.
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 8:45 AM, Jean-Sébastien Pédron wrote:
> Hi!
>
> An update to the DRM subsystem, not i
Hi!
An update to the DRM subsystem, not including the drivers, is ready for
wider testing!
The patch against HEAD is here:
https://people.freebsd.org/~dumbbell/graphics/drm-update-38.f.patch
I'm interested in success/failure reports for amd64, powerpc and
powerpc64 users, for i915 and Radeon GPU
29 matches
Mail list logo
