On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 08:49:59PM -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> > Question: Does the rpcbind program in -current have the same problem
> > or has it already been fixed by whomever you imported the code from?
> > (If it hasn't been fixed I'll be happy to fix it. I'm hoping it has,
:I hope you have commited it, or well soon, to -stable, as this one has
:surely been one to send many a young admin screaming from his cubicle
:yelling ``but it should work, it really should just work''.
Yah, it's in just under the wire. I was tearing my hair out today trying
to figure o
> Ok guys. I just had to fix a problem with portmap in -stable related
> to binding to specific IP addresses so replies to UDP packets come
> 'from' the proper IP address (for multi-homed hosts).
This has been a problem with portmap for as long as I can remember (back
to the SunOS 3
* Matt Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010409 19:40] wrote:
> Ok guys. I just had to fix a problem with portmap in -stable related
> to binding to specific IP addresses so replies to UDP packets come
> 'from' the proper IP address (for multi-homed hosts).
>
> Question: Does the rpc
Ok guys. I just had to fix a problem with portmap in -stable related
to binding to specific IP addresses so replies to UDP packets come
'from' the proper IP address (for multi-homed hosts).
Question: Does the rpcbind program in -current have the same problem
or has it alrea
> I do not. -v could easily be added to what is now rpcbind (even if it
> was ignored). -d mean the same thing for both. there's then no reason
> to change its name.
Well, my feeling on the matter, since everyone gets to have an opinion
today, is that we should stick with rpcbind: it's what e
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 10:14:07PM +0200, Karsten W. Rohrbach wrote:
> Peter Wemm([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2001.03.28/06:24:34(epoch+985757074s):
Drop this useless discussion, or take me off the blooming CC: list.
Learn to use your editor!
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscri
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Karsten W. Rohrbach" writes:
: Peter Wemm([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2001.03.28/06:24:34(epoch+985757074s):
: > FYI:
: >
: > SYNOPSIS
: > portmap [-d] [-v]
: >
: > SYNOPSIS
: > rpcbind [-dilLs]
:
: yup, so i think it makes sense, to have the daemon called rpcbi
Peter Wemm([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2001.03.28/06:24:34(epoch+985757074s):
> FYI:
>
> SYNOPSIS
> portmap [-d] [-v]
>
> SYNOPSIS
> rpcbind [-dilLs]
yup, so i think it makes sense, to have the daemon called rpcbind, since
it would probably break other people's configuration after making world
Doug Barton wrote:
> "Karsten W. Rohrbach" wrote:
>
> > the idea is, that if rpcbind takes parameters different from portmap it
> > would make sense to call rpcbind rpcbind because people's boxes will
> > start to barf when rpcbind is called portmap, they make world, and skip
> > reading the rpcb
"Karsten W. Rohrbach" wrote:
> the idea is, that if rpcbind takes parameters different from portmap it
> would make sense to call rpcbind rpcbind because people's boxes will
> start to barf when rpcbind is called portmap, they make world, and skip
> reading the rpcbind paragraph in UPDATING ;-)
>
Doug Barton([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 10:05:40AM -0800:
> "Karsten W. Rohrbach" wrote:
> >
> > Warner Losh([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 12:40:18AM -0700:
> > > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Greg Lehey writes:
> > > : > Play the ball, not the man.
> > > :
> > > : I don't
Warner Losh wrote:
>
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Greg Lehey writes:
> : > Play the ball, not the man.
> :
> : I don't have an objection to the change, I was just asking. And
> : "because System V does it this way" has never been a good answer for
> : us. And no, I'm not picking on Doug, ju
"Karsten W. Rohrbach" wrote:
>
> Warner Losh([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 12:40:18AM -0700:
> > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Greg Lehey writes:
> > : > Play the ball, not the man.
> > :
> > : I don't have an objection to the change, I was just asking. And
> > : "because System V doe
Warner Losh([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 12:40:18AM -0700:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Greg Lehey writes:
> : > Play the ball, not the man.
> :
> : I don't have an objection to the change, I was just asking. And
> : "because System V does it this way" has never been a good answer
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Greg Lehey writes:
: > Play the ball, not the man.
:
: I don't have an objection to the change, I was just asking. And
: "because System V does it this way" has never been a good answer for
: us. And no, I'm not picking on Doug, just making a point.
I see no reas
On Monday, 26 March 2001 at 18:19:06 +1000, Andrew Reilly wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 05:24:14PM +0930, Greg Lehey wrote:
>> On Sunday, 25 March 2001 at 23:48:10 -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
>>> Greg Lehey wrote:
On Wednesday, 21 March 2001 at 10:44:38 -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
>
On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 05:24:14PM +0930, Greg Lehey wrote:
> On Sunday, 25 March 2001 at 23:48:10 -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
> > Greg Lehey wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wednesday, 21 March 2001 at 10:44:38 -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> >>> The Portmapper binary has been renamed from `portmap' to `rpcbind'.
On Sunday, 25 March 2001 at 23:48:10 -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
> Greg Lehey wrote:
>>
>> On Wednesday, 21 March 2001 at 10:44:38 -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
>>> The Portmapper binary has been renamed from `portmap' to `rpcbind'.
>>
>> Why?
>
> So we can be more like sysV
This is good?
Greg
Greg Lehey wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, 21 March 2001 at 10:44:38 -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> > The Portmapper binary has been renamed from `portmap' to `rpcbind'.
>
> Why?
So we can be more like sysV
--
Perhaps the greatest damage the American system of education has done
to it
* Greg Lehey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010325 15:33] wrote:
> On Wednesday, 21 March 2001 at 10:44:38 -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> > The Portmapper binary has been renamed from `portmap' to `rpcbind'.
>
> Why?
We've upgraded to Sun's TIRPC code, this includes rpcbind as a replacement
for portmapper.
On Wednesday, 21 March 2001 at 10:44:38 -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> The Portmapper binary has been renamed from `portmap' to `rpcbind'.
Why?
Greg
--
Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] for PGP public key
See complete headers for address and phone numbers
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wi
The Portmapper binary has been renamed from `portmap' to `rpcbind'.
The name change was taken care of in /etc/defaults/rc.conf and in the
auto-dependacy code in /etc/rc.
HOWEVER, you may need to edit your /etc/hosts.allow and make the name
change there.
--
-- David ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
23 matches
Mail list logo
