On Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 06:25:30PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Michael C . Wu" writes:
> : Thinker thinks that memset() is too costly to use here
> : to modify one or two bytes. I agreed with him in that
> : filenames can't b
For style reason, I make another patch file.
- begin ---
--- util.c.orig Sun Mar 18 16:35:12 2001
+++ util.c Tue Mar 20 18:12:23 2001
@@ -60,15 +60,43 @@
prn_printable(s)
const char *s;
{
- unsigned char c;
- int n;
+ const char *p; /* Str
On Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 01:12:46AM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
.. skip ...
> > + size_t sz;
> > + wchar_t c;
>
> C has allowed for identifiers larger than 6 characters for quite
> some time, any chance on you making use of this feature? Or at
> least adding a comment here and ther
Hi,
There are some disscuss about patch file of /bin/ls. You guys
give me some suggestion, and I make a new patch file for /bin/ls to
meet people's wish. Following is patch for /bin/ls, plz review again.
I had change from rune to mb* & wc* ways.
- begin -
--- util.c.or
