> On 14 Feb 2020, at 19:18, Ed Maste wrote:
>
> Upstream OpenSSH-portable removed libwrap support in version 6.7,
> released in October 2014. We've maintained a patch in our tree to
> restore it, but it causes friction on each OpenSSH update and may
> introduce security vulnerabilities not pres
you suggested you (Borja Marcos) did with the Dell salesman), where in
> reality each has its own advantages and disadvantages.
I know, but this is not the case. But it’s quite frustrating to try to order a
server with a HBA rather than a RAID and receiving an answer such as
“the HBA op
> On 01 Aug 2016, at 15:12, O. Hartmann wrote:
>
> First, thanks for responding so quickly.
>
>> - The third option is to make the driver expose the SAS devices like a HBA
>> would do, so that they are visible to the CAM layer, and disks are handled by
>> the stock “da” driver, which is the ide
> On 01 Aug 2016, at 08:45, O. Hartmann wrote:
>
> On Wed, 22 Jun 2016 08:58:08 +0200
> Borja Marcos wrote:
>
>> There is an option you can use (I do it all the time!) to make the card
>> behave as a plain HBA so that the disks are handled by the “da” driver
On Dec 5, 2014, at 2:00 PM, Steven Hartland wrote:
>
> On 04/09/2014 09:49, Borja Marcos wrote:
>> On Jun 30, 2014, at 8:02 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
>>
>>> I think these sound fine, but I've cc'd Xin Li (delphij@) who has worked
>>> with
>&
On Jun 30, 2014, at 8:02 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> I think these sound fine, but I've cc'd Xin Li (delphij@) who has worked with
> folks at Emulex to maintain this driver. He is probably the best person to
> review this.
Hi,
Seems 10.1 is on the pipeline now, but as far as I know none of th
On Jul 15, 2014, at 1:36 PM, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> So, asking for spiritual counsel now. Would you use this driver in a
> production environment instead of the 747 version downloaded from Emulex? I
> think the latter is giving slightly better performance but, anyway, I disable
> LRO and
On Jul 15, 2014, at 11:45 AM, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> I just tried to run iperf3 with this patch and STABLE-10 and it seems to
> work.
> Do you have a panic?
So far, so good. I've ran a couple of iperf3 tests (60 seconds, trying both
directions) and it doesn't crash.
Without the fixes I ob
On Jul 15, 2014, at 11:45 AM, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> I just tried to run iperf3 with this patch and STABLE-10 and it seems to work.
> Do you have a panic?
Still compiling :) Anyway, you didn't suffer panics before, right?
Borja.
___
freebsd-c
On Jul 15, 2014, at 10:43 AM, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> I used the "oce" driver in CURRENT.
> I think that this patch in combination with the previous one should work in
> 10-STABLE.
>
> I have only tested if it works with CURRENT, but now I try if it works with
> 10-STABLE and I'll send you s
On Jul 15, 2014, at 10:43 AM, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> I used the "oce" driver in CURRENT.
> I think that this patch in combination with the previous one should work in
> 10-STABLE.
>
> I have only tested if it works with CURRENT, but now I try if it works with
> 10-STABLE and I'll send yo
On Jul 15, 2014, at 10:22 AM, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> Hi,
> I found other problems in the "oce" driver during some experiments with
> netmap in emulation mode.
What about driver version 10.0.747.0? At least in my configuration it works
perfectly, no crashes despite keeping it running for s
On Jul 7, 2014, at 1:23 PM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 1:03 PM, Borja Marcos wrote:
> we'll try to investigate, can you tell us more about the environment you use ?
> (FreeBSD version, card model (PCI id perhaps), iperf3 invocation line,
> interface configurati
On Jul 1, 2014, at 10:24 PM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 8:58 PM, wrote:
> El 30.06.2014 18:36, Stefano Garzarella escribió:
>
> Hello,
> I had problems during some experiments with Emulex and "oce" driver in
> CURRENT.
> I found several bugs in the "oce" driver and thi
On Sep 13, 2013, at 2:18 PM, Steven Hartland wrote:
> This is a recent bit of code by Justin cc'ed, so he's likely the best person
> to
> investigate this one.
Hmm. There is still a lot of confusion surrounding all this, and it's a time
bomb waiting to explode.
A friend had serious problems o
prism card the problem is corrected, anyway I agreed with you about the
driver is very solid and fast, but fixing this Errors will be GREAT!, I
hope someone can fix this soon
Regards
Marcos
Kelley Reynolds wrote:
The ath driver has been very solid since the last update about 5 days ago.. no
media OFDM/36Mbps mode 11g
Give that a try on the FreeBSD AP, and see if that helps at all (you
may want to try the 11b modes, like:
ifconfig ath0 media DS/2Mbps mode 11b
or something..
Eric
--
Marcos Biscaysaqu
Systems Administrator
ThePacific.Net Ltd.
ath_start: encapsulation failure
ath_start: encapsulation failure
Eric Anderson wrote:
Marcos Biscaysaqu wrote:
Hi Eric.
I have no loss connection on 11b only on 11g, so for the moment
im keep working with a Athreos Wireless card on hostap in 11b
connecting 34 clients, and really is wor
-> 2M (14 ok, 0 err, 0 retr)
Eric Anderson wrote:
Marcos Biscaysaqu wrote:
Hi Eric.
I have no loss connection on 11b only on 11g, so for the moment
im keep working with a Athreos Wireless card on hostap in 11b
connecting 34 clients, and really is working VERY well until I have
lot of Ie
failure
ath_start: encapsulation failure
ath_start: encapsulation failure
ath_start: encapsulation failure
ath_start: encapsulation failure
Eric Anderson wrote:
Marcos Biscaysaqu wrote:
Hi Eric.
I have no loss connection on 11b only on 11g, so for the moment
im keep working with a Athreos
Marcos Biscaysaqu wrote:
Hi Eric.
I have no loss connection on 11b only on 11g, so for the moment im
keep working with a Athreos Wireless card on hostap in 11b connecting
34 clients, and really is working VERY well until I have lot of Ierrs
and Oerrs and the ping to the client go from 2
Leo Bicknell wrote:
In an effort to cut down on Sam's load...
This is a known issue. Evidently there are some low level radio
counters that are incorrectly being reported as input errors.
Basically they should be ignored until the driver can be changed
to not report them.
--
M
ors 6--
Marcos Biscaysaqu
Systems Administrator
ThePacific.Net Ltd.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
--
Marcos Biscay
Ierrs Errors 21
Oerrs Errores 3
Ierrs Errors 0
Oerrs Errores 5
Ierrs Errors 2
Oerrs Errores 6
Ierrs Errors 6--
Marcos Biscaysaqu
Systems Administrator
ThePacific.Net Ltd.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo
Oerrs Coll
ath0 1500 00:09:5b:94:63:e5 619574 8869 875732
66818 0
illegal prefixlen
ath0 1500 default fe80:1::209:5bff:0 -3
- -
Marcos Biscaysaqu wrote:
Hi there,
a month ago we couldn't made work a Freebsd in hostap with the new
At
to fast as Atheros cards.
please if someone has an idea or need more informarion reply me.
Thanks!
--
Marcos Biscaysaqu
Systems Administrator
ThePacific.Net Ltd.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-
I'd send this to the FBSD list, but I just moved server IP blocks and the reverse DNS stuff hasn't propagated yet.
Kelley
--
Marcos Biscaysaqu
Systems Administrator
ThePacific.Net Ltd.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd
ad0: 19130MB [38869/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA100
acd0: CDROM at ata1-slave PIO4
Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a
ath0: promiscuous mode enabled
rl0: promiscuous mode enabled
--
Marcos Biscaysaqu
Systems Administrator
ThePacific.Net Ltd.
___
[E
Hi There,
Any time I try to install my 5.1 current version I have got this error:
/usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libc.so.5" not found
and I need install all again
someone can help me please
thanks
--
Marcos Biscaysaqu
Systems Administrator
ThePacif
trative consequences of enabling this!
device bpf # Berkeley packet filter
# USB support
device uhci # UHCI PCI->USB interface
device ohci # OHCI PCI->USB interface
device usb # USB Bus (required)
#device umass # Disks/Mass storage - Requires scbus and da
device ums # Mo
2385 2385 2385 ath0:
device timeout
ad0: Warring - FLUSHCACHE recovered from missing interrupt
ad0: Warring - WRITE_DMA recovered from missing interrupt
ath0:device timeout
ath0:device timeout
Sam Leffler wrote:
On Tuesday 21 October 2003 05:10 pm, Marcos Biscaysaqu wrote:
I have a Atheros
ostap mediaopt turbo
sysctl net.link.ether.bridge.enable=1
sysctl net.link.ether.bridge_cfg="ath0 rl0"
sysctl net.link.ether.bridge_ipfw=1
sysctl net.inet.ip.forwarding=1
thanks
--
Marcos Biscaysaqu
Systems Administrator
ThePacific.Net Ltd.
___
we made it, we made lots of test, but the wireless card keep crashing every
4 min
check this out:
http://202.49.92.224/atheros/TESTFAst.html
- Original Message -
From: "Brad Knowles" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Marcos Biscaysaqu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi Sam,
thanks.
But we made e throughput tets in the Hostap mode and the AP crash after 4
min of traffic. We try with differents card but still the same
thanks
Marcos
- Original Message -
From: "Sam Leffler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturda
DLINK and NETGEAR card, Very good speed but the Freebsd AP crash after 4
min.
idea??? help??
throughput Test.
http://202.49.92.224/atheros/TESTFAst.html
Marcos Biscaysaqu wrote:
Hi there.
The Atheros driver new version fix the problem to make work the
wireless card on mode 11a point-to-point
sheel like "dd>" .
ideas?
thanks
Sam Leffler wrote:
On Wednesday 08 October 2003 08:45 pm, Marcos Biscaysaqu wrote:
Hi There.
I have 2 PCI wireless card with the Atheros chipset some one know
how can i setup a point-to-point with 2 of this wireless card on
Freebsd, I could mad
Hi There.
I have 2 PCI wireless card with the Atheros chipset some one know
how can i setup a point-to-point with 2 of this wireless card on
Freebsd, I could made work Access Point client, but i couln't adhoc
turbo mode 11a
thanks
--
Marcos Biscaysaqu
Systems Administrator
ThePacifi
w and looks fine but slower than PCMCIA prism
II) .
you have to use the firmware 1.4.9 or 1.5.6, I trust more in 1.4.9
Don't use freebsd 5.1 is half speed less!
cheers!
Marcos
tokza wrote:
On Monday 06 October 2003 05:22, Marcos Biscaysaqu wrote:
Ok.!
Anyway don't use the Dlink 520
nk.dlink.com/pr/?prid=27>.
Reading card
specification I thought that "22 mbps with AirPlus series" is a kind
of PR or
adverticement :-)
Or is this a kind of "enhanced 802.b" standart? Where can I read
Hi There .
I have in comming a couple a Proxim 8480- pcmcia , with Atheros
Chipset and 8482- pci .
someone knows if this card work on Freebsd?
thanks
--
Marcos Biscaysaqu
Systems Administrator
ThePacific.Net Ltd.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing
work perfect on
Freebsd 5.0.
I tried different computer, adapters, settings, wireless card, but
always is crap on Freebsd 5.1 current or 5.1 realese.
May be I need an Special setup?
thanks
--
Marcos Biscaysaqu
Systems Administrator
ThePacific.Ne
ork really well until crash.
thanks!!
--
Marcos Biscaysaqu
Systems Administrator
ThePacific.Net Ltd.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
net.inet.ip.forwarding=1
Any information aditional, please send me an email
We are trying to do this with freebsd 5.1 and the wireless stable but
the speed is very lower than with 5.0 we couln't make it work on more
than 2mbps
ideas???
--
Marcos Biscays
having 2mbps when I setup 11Mbps?
thanks
Bosko Milekic wrote:
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 10:10:00AM +1200, Marcos - ThePacific.net wrote:
...
Any information aditional, please send me an email
We are trying to do this with freebsd 5.1 and the wireless stable but
the speed is very lower than with
2Mbps )
status: associated
ssid XBOX 1:XBOX
stationname "FreeBSD WaveLAN/IEEE node"
channel 10 authmode OPEN powersavemode OFF powersavesleep 100
wepmode OFF weptxkey 1
thanks
--
Marcos Biscaysaqu
Systems Administrator
The
Looking at the kernel sources, I see that in /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c,
--- snip
/*
* note: PCPU_LAZY_INC() can only be used if we can afford
* occassional inaccuracy in the count.
*/
PCPU_LAZY_INC(cnt.v_syscall);
--- snip
This seems to be a macro to
Hello,
I have tried to file PR, but the web pages give an authorization error.
There is a problem in -CURRENT. The vm.stats.sys.v_syscall from the system
MIB is not updated. This variable was used at least by the systat command,
and it happens to be used by an Orca (www
47 matches
Mail list logo
